CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a PFAS reaction library: identifying plausible transformation pathways in environmental and biological systems

Weber, Eric J., Tebes-Stevens, Caroline, Washington, John W., Gladstone, Rachel·2022·Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
DOI 10.1039/d1em00445j
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We have developed reaction libraries for predicting transformation products of PFAS in a variety of environmental and biological reaction systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d1em00445j

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Lasier, 2011, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 30, 2194, 10.1002/etc.622 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Glynn, 2020, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 22, 930
  3. Workman, 2019, Environ. Pollut., 249, 758, 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.054 · DOI
  4. Hurley, 2018, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 277, 10.1021/acs.est.7b04650 · DOI
  5. Munoz, 2017, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 1231, 10.1021/acs.est.6b05432 · DOI
  6. Khan, 2019, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 7036, 10.1021/acs.est.9b00637 · DOI
  7. Roscales, 2019, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 9855, 10.1021/acs.est.9b02677 · DOI
  8. Hitchcock, 2019, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 5427, 10.1021/acs.est.9b00014 · DOI
  9. Smithwick, 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 1139, 10.1021/es051750h · DOI
  10. Casal, 2017, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2766, 10.1021/acs.est.6b05821 · DOI
  11. Tebes-Stevens, 2018, Chemosphere, 194, 94, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.137 · DOI
  12. Tebes-Stevens, 2017, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5008, 10.1021/acs.est.6b05412 · DOI
  13. Ellis, 2008, Nucleic Acids Res., 36, W427, 10.1093/nar/gkn315 · DOI
  14. Marchant, 2008, Toxicol. Mech. Methods, 18, 177, 10.1080/15376510701857320 · DOI
  15. Djoumbou-Feunang, 2019, J. Cheminf., 11, 2, 10.1186/s13321-018-0324-5 · DOI
  16. Wang, 2009, Chemosphere, 75, 1089, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.033 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Nabb, 2007, Toxicol. Sci., 100, 333, 10.1093/toxsci/kfm230 · DOI
  18. Wang, 2012, Chemosphere, 87, 527, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.056 · DOI · Paper page
  19. D'Agostino, 2017, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 36, 2012, 10.1002/etc.3750 · DOI
  20. Peng, 2014, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 1058, 10.1021/es404867w · DOI
  21. Zhao, 2018, Environ. Pollut., 241, 19, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.046 · DOI
  22. Kim, 2012, Biotechnol Bioeng ., 109, 3041, 10.1002/bit.24561 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Zhang, 2016, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 13309, 10.1021/acs.est.6b03734 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Fasano, 2009, Chem.-Biol. Interact., 180, 281, 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.03.015 · DOI
  25. Butt, 2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 4973, 10.1021/es100702a · DOI
  26. Hurley, 2004, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108, 1973, 10.1021/jp0373088 · DOI
  27. Hurley, 2004, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108, 615, 10.1021/jp036343b · DOI
  28. Young, 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3455, 10.1021/es0626234 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Liu, 2010, Chemosphere, 78, 437, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.044 · DOI
  30. Jin, 2020, J. Hazard. Mater., 385, 121564, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121564 · DOI
  31. Schuster, 2010, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 244, 247, 10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.022 · DOI
  32. Zhang, 2020, Environ. Pollut., 257, 113513, 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113513 · DOI
  33. Zhang, 2016, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 13309, 10.1021/acs.est.6b03734 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Chen, 2019, Sci. Total Environ., 656, 201, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.297 · DOI
  35. Martin, 2005, Chem.-Biol. Interact., 155, 165, 10.1016/j.cbi.2005.06.007 · DOI
  36. Jin, 2019, J. Hazard. Mater., 121564
  37. Jin, 1996, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 9, 555, 10.1021/tx950162m · DOI
  38. Jin, 1995, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 210, 498, 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1688 · DOI
  39. Iyer, 1996, Anesthesiology, 85, 1454, 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00028 · DOI
  40. Dagnino, 2016, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 10216, 10.1021/acs.est.6b01170 · DOI
  41. Liberatore, 2020, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 7, 477, 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00323 · DOI
  42. Shaw, 2019, Sci. Total Environ., 647, 690, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.012 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Van Hamme, 2013, Microbiology, 159, 1618, 10.1099/mic.0.068932-0 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Schuster, 2008, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 233, 323, 10.1016/j.taap.2008.08.018 · DOI
  45. Bunton, 1966, J. Org. Chem., 31, 2307, 10.1021/jo01345a053 · DOI
  46. Koster, 1994, Drug Metab. Dispos., 22, 667
  47. Andreades, 1961, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 4670, 10.1021/ja01483a047 · DOI
  48. Meresaar, 1974, Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. A, 28, 715, 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.28a-0715 · DOI
  49. Ruan, 2013, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11504, 10.1021/es4018128 · DOI
  50. Royer, 2015, Chemosphere, 129, 54, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.077 · DOI
  51. Butt, 2010, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 29, 2736, 10.1002/etc.348 · DOI
  52. Dasu, 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 3831, 10.1021/es203978g · DOI
  53. Dasu, 2013, Chemosphere, 91, 399, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.076 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Lewis, 2016, J. Hazard. Mater., 320, 479, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.036 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Arakaki, 2010, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 88, 1193, 10.1007/s00253-010-2815-9 · DOI
  56. Kutsuna, 2018, J. Fluorine Chem., 211, 109, 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2018.04.013 · DOI
  57. Ruan, 2014, Chemosphere, 112, 34, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.068 · DOI
  58. Zhang, 2020, Environ. Pollut., 113513, 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113513 · DOI
  59. Dasu, 2016, Chemosphere, 144, 2482, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.021 · DOI
  60. Arakaki, 2017, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 101, 8259, 10.1007/s00253-017-8538-4 · DOI
  61. D'Eon, 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 4799, 10.1021/es070126x · DOI
  62. Mahmood, 1986, Inorg. Chem., 25, 3128, 10.1021/ic00238a006 · DOI
  63. Lee, 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 3489, 10.1021/es204533m · DOI · Paper page
  64. Letcher, 2014, Chemosphere, 112, 225, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.022 · DOI
  65. Knunyants, 1972, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 11, 583, 10.1002/anie.197205831 · DOI
  66. Peng, 2014, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 1058, 10.1021/es404867w · DOI
  67. Rhoads, 2008, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 2873, 10.1021/es702866c · DOI · Paper page
  68. Zhao, 2018, Environ. Pollut., 241, 19, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.046 · DOI
  69. Tomy, 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 758, 10.1021/es034550j · DOI
  70. Moe, 2012, Chemosphere, 89, 869, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Kharasch, 1995, Anesthesiology, 82, 1369, 10.1097/00000542-199506000-00008 · DOI
  72. Butt, 2010, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 29, 2726, 10.1002/etc.349 · DOI
  73. Zhaoa, 2013, Chemosphere, 90, 203, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.035 · DOI
  74. Martin, 2005, Chem.-Biol. Interact., 155, 165, 10.1016/j.cbi.2005.06.007 · DOI
  75. Frömel, 2010, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 208, 161
  76. Zhang, 2016, Chemosphere, 154, 224, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.062 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Yi, 2020, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 345, 10.1021/acs.est.9b05258 · DOI
  78. Peng, 2008, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 32, 927, 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00127.x · DOI
  79. Brendel, 2018, Environ. Sci. Eur., 30, 9, 10.1186/s12302-018-0134-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Weber, E. J., Tebes-Stevens, C., Washington, J. W., & Gladstone, R.
Venue
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2022
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
689-753
ISSN
  • 2050-7887
  • 2050-7895
DOI
10.1039/d1em00445j
Cited by
30
References
24
Language
en
Licence
rsc.li/journals-terms-of-use (am, 458 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a PFAS reaction library: identifying plausible transformation pathways in environmental and biological systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/d1em00445j
The paper
Weber, E. J., Tebes-Stevens, C., Washington, J. W., & Gladstone, R. (2022). Development of a PFAS reaction library: identifying plausible transformation pathways in environmental and biological systems. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1em00445j