Cited by 81Barrier Structure and Function StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

The pericyte–glia interface at the blood–brain barrier

Open access
Giannoni, Patrizia, Badaut, Jerome, Dargazanli, Cyril, De Maudave, Alexis Fayd’Herbe, Klement, Wendy, Costalat, Vincent, Marchi, Nicola·2018·Clinical Science

Abstract

The cerebrovasculature is a multicellular structure with varying rheological and permeability properties. The outer wall of the brain capillary endothelium is enclosed by pericytes and astrocyte end feet, anatomically assembled to guarantee barrier functions. We, here, focus on the pericyte modifications occurring in disease conditions, reviewing evidence supporting the interplay amongst pericytes, the endothelium, and glial cells in health and pathology. Deconstruction and reactivity of pericytes and glial cells around the capillary endothelium occur in response to traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, and neurodegenerative disorders, impacting vascular permeability and participating in neuroinflammation. As this represents a growing field of research, addressing the multicellular reorganization occurring at the outer wall of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in response to an acute insult or a chronic disease could disclose novel disease mechanisms and therapeutic targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/cs20171634

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giannoni, P., Badaut, J., Dargazanli, C., De Maudave, A. F., Klement, W., Costalat, V., & Marchi, N.
Affiliations
  • Université de Nîmes (FR)
  • Laboratory of Brain Molecular Imaging, CNRS UMR5287, University of Bordeaux, France
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Mechanisms of Brain Disorders, Department of Neuroscience, Institute of Functional Genomics (UMR 5203 CNRS – U 1191 INSERM, University of Montpellier), Montpellier, France
Corresponding author
Marchi, Nicola
Venue
Clinical Science
Published
2018-02-08
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
361-374
ISSN
  • 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8736
OpenAlex
W2786513893
Cited by
81
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Clinical Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE37-0013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
pericytes, blood-brain barrier, cerebrovascular endothelium, vascular permeability, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Capillary Permeability, Humans, Neuroglia, Pericytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review