Cited by 2,102Barrier Structure and Function StudiesCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus

Open access
Montagne, Axel, Barnes, Samuel R., Sweeney, Melanie D., Halliday, Matthew R., Sagare, Abhay P., Zhao, Zhen, Toga, Arthur W., Jacobs, Russell E. +6 more·2015·Neuron

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits entry of blood-derived products, pathogens, and cells into the brain that is essential for normal neuronal functioning and information processing. Post-mortem tissue analysis indicates BBB damage in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The timing of BBB breakdown remains, however, elusive. Using an advanced dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI protocol with high spatial and temporal resolutions to quantify regional BBB permeability in the living human brain, we show an age-dependent BBB breakdown in the hippocampus, a region critical for learning and memory that is affected early in AD. The BBB breakdown in the hippocampus and its CA1 and dentate gyrus subdivisions worsened with mild cognitive impairment that correlated with injury to BBB-associated pericytes, as shown by the cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Our data suggest that BBB breakdown is an early event in the aging human brain that begins in the hippocampus and may contribute to cognitive impairment.Video abstract

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.032

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have suggested that during preclinical stages, vascular dysfunction is among the first detectable biomarker changes reported before symptomatic onset and before changes in other standard AD biomarkers, including amyloid deposition and CSF Aβ42, phosphorylated tau, and total tau.

    “Some studies have suggested that during preclinical stages, vascular dysfunction is among the first detectable biomarker changes reported before symptomatic onset and before changes in other standard AD biomarkers, including amyloid deposition and CSF A 𝛃 42, phosphorylated tau (pTau), and total tau (285, 421).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [421]

    The Introduction and Discussion report hippocampal BBB breakdown in people with no cognitive impairment, consistent with vascular changes before symptoms. The Results (Molecular biomarker CSF analysis) report no change in CSF Aβ42, tau, or pTau despite evidence of BBB breakdown. The paper does not establish that vascular changes precede amyloid deposition or demonstrate a longitudinal order of biomarker changes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increasing evidence supports that early cerebrovascular dysfunction contributes to AD pathophysiology and cognitive impairment.

    “In addition to the classic hallmark pathology, A 𝛃 plaques, hyperphosphorylated tau neurofibrillary tangles, and neuron loss, increasing evidence supports that early cerebrovascular dysfunction contributes to AD pathophysiology and cognitive impairment (29, 285, 418, 421, 429, 569, 571, 593, 682, 693).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [421]

  • Patlak analysis allows detection of subtle changes in BBB permeability.

    “These studies used Patlak analysis (46, 47, 466), which allows detection of subtle changes in BBB permeability (46, 248, 418, 421).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [421]

  • Recent neuroimaging studies in individuals with MCI and early AD reveal BBB breakdown in the hippocampus, including its CA1 and dentate gyrus subfields, and several gray and white matter regions, before brain atrophy and dementia.

    “Recent neuroimaging studies in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD reveal BBB breakdown in the hippocampus, including its CA1 and dentate gyrus subfields (421), and several gray and white matter regions (220-222), respectively, before brain atrophy and dementia.”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [421]

  • Qalb is elevated in individuals with preclinical Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease without vascular risk factors, and Alzheimer's disease with vascular risk factors.

    “Qalb is elevated in individuals with preclinical AD (229), MCI (421), AD without vascular risk factors (287, 545, 546), and AD with vascular risk factors (67, 68, 74, 629).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [421]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montagne, A., Barnes, S. R., Sweeney, M. D., Halliday, M. R., Sagare, A. P., Zhao, Z., Toga, A. W., Jacobs, R. E., Liu, C. Y., Amezcua, L., Harrington, M. G., Chui, H. C., Law, M., & Zlokovic, B. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Huntington Medical Research Institutes (US)
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
296-302
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034275438
Cited by
2,102
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 214 · 2025: 211 · 2024: 208 · 2023: 213 · 2022: 228 · 2021: 227 · 2020: 204 · 2019: 168 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 68
FWCI
76.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000130)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG039452, R37AG023084, P50-AG05142, P50AG005142, R37AG23084, RF1AG039452)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R37NS034467, R01NS034467, R37NS34467)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB000993, R21EB013456, R01EB000993, P41EB015922)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
blood-brain barrier disruption, hippocampus, brain aging, Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, blood-brain barrier permeability, pericytes, CA1, dentate gyrus, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Albumins, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Caudate Nucleus, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Permeability, Serum Albumin, Thalamus, Case-Control Studies, Neostriatum, Dentate Gyrus, Pericytes, Young Adult, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, CA3 Region, Hippocampal, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review