Cited by 120Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesDermatology and Skin DiseasesAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

The influence of body mass index on skin susceptibility to sodium lauryl sulphate

Löffler, H., Aramaki, J. U. N., Effendy, Isaak·2002·Skin Research and Technology

Abstract

Background: The influence of nutrition on the physiological functions of man is well studied. Numerous diseases can be exacerbated by obesity. However, it has not yet been determined whether body weight and body mass index (BMI), as an indicator of a high body fat store, can influence skin sensitivity. Objective: This study investigates the correlation between body mass index and the epidermal functions, evaluated by bioengineering methods, before and after an irritant patch test with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS). Methods: Epidermal functions were evaluated using an evaporimeter, chromameter and laser‐Doppler‐flowmeter. Patch testing was conducted for 48 h with two different concentrations of SLS (0.25% and 0.5%) on the forearms of healthy volunteers. Measurements were performed 24 h after patch removal. Results: Obese individuals showed significantly increased transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin blood flow and skin colour (red) as compared to a control group. However, the degree of skin sensitivity to SLS was not correlated with BMI. Conclusion: Basal biophysical parameters of the skin are primarily correlated with the BMI. This may be caused by obesity‐induced physiological changes, e.g. increased sweat gland activity, high blood pressure and physiological temperature‐regulating system. The epidermal barrier function, as evaluated after SLS patch testing is, however, not correlated with a high BMI, indicating a normal skin barrier.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0909-752x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Löffler, H., Aramaki, J. U. N., & Effendy, I.
Affiliations
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Löffler, H.
Venue
Skin Research and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
19-22
ISSN
  • 0909-752X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0846
OpenAlex
W2140923242
Cited by
120
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Skin Research and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
body mass index, obesity, sodium dodecyl sulfate, skin irritation, transepidermal water loss, skin blood flow, skin colour, skin barrier function, skin biophysics
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Biophysics, Epidermis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Skin, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate, Surface-Active Agents, Water, Body Mass Index, Laser-Doppler Flowmetry, Dermatitis, Irritant, Skin Irritancy Tests, Biophysical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review