Cited by 224Memory and Neural MechanismsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The ubiquitin–proteasome cascade is required for mammalian long‐term memory formation

Lopez‐Salon, Mariella, Alonso, Mariana, Vianna, Monica R. M., Viola, Haydee, E Souza, Tadeu Mello, Izquierdo, Ivan, Pasquini, Juana M., Medina, Jorge H.·2001·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

It has been recently demonstrated that ubiquitin–proteasome‐mediated proteolysis is required for long‐term synaptic facilitation in Aplysia. Here we show that the hippocampal blockade of this proteolytic pathway is also required for the formation of long‐term memory in the rat. Bilateral infusion of lactacystin, a specific proteasome inhibitor, to the CA1 region caused full retrograde amnesia for a one‐trial inhibitory avoidance learning when given 1, 4 or 7h, but not 10 h, after training. Proteasome inhibitor I produced similar effects. In addition, inhibitory avoidance training resulted in an increased ubiquitination and 26S proteasome proteolytic activity and a decrease in the levels of IkappaB, a substrate of the ubiquitin–proteasome cascade, in hippocampus 4 h after training. Together, these findings indicate that the ubiquitin–proteasome cascade is crucial for the establishment of LTM in the behaving animal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01806.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proteasome inhibitors impair one-trial avoidance learning, spatial learning, and aversive taste memory formation.

    “Early studies revealed impairments in one-trial avoidance learning, spatial learning, and aversive taste memory formation on treatment with proteasome inhibitors (Lopez-Salon et al., 2001; Artinian et al., 2008; Rodriguez-Ortiz et al., 2011).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez‐Salon, M., Alonso, M., Vianna, M. R. M., Viola, H., E Souza, T. M., Izquierdo, I., Pasquini, J. M., & Medina, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Medina, Jorge H.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
1820-1826
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2127639747
Cited by
224
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
ubiquitin-proteasome system, long-term memory, hippocampus, CA1, lactacystin, proteasome inhibitors, passive avoidance, retrograde amnesia, ubiquitination, IκB, 26S proteasome, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Amnesia, Retrograde, Animals, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Multienzyme Complexes, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Peptide Hydrolases, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Ubiquitin, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review