Cited by 139Circadian rhythm and melatoninPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Influence of melatonin administration on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity of postmenopausal women

Open access
Cagnacci, Angelo, Arangino, Serenella, Renzi, Antonietta, Paoletti, Anna Maria, Melis, Gian Benedetto, Cagnacci, Paolo, Volpe, Annibale·2001·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The effect of melatonin on human carbohydrate metabolism is not yet clear. We investigated whether melatonin influences glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in aged women. PATIENTS: Twenty-two postmenopausal women of whom 14 were on hormone replacement therapy. DESIGN: After an overnight fast, at 0800 hours on two nonconsecutive days, placebo or melatonin (1 mg) were administered randomly and in a double blind fashion. Forty-five minutes later, an oral glucose tolerance test (75 g; OGTT) was performed in 13 women. In another nine women insulin-dependent (Si) and -independent (Sg) glucose utilization was tested by a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). RESULTS: Areas under the response curve to OGTT (AUC) for glucose (1420 +/- 59 vs. 1250 +/- 55 mmol x min/l; P < 0.01), and C-peptide (42,0980 +/- 45,320 vs. 33,528 +/- 15,779 pmol x min/l; P < 0.02) were higher following melatonin than placebo, while Si values were lower (2.6 +/- 0.28 units vs. 3.49 +/- 0.4 units; P < 0.03). Si modifications induced by melatonin were inversely related to Si values of the placebo day (r(2) = 0.538; P < 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate that in aged women administration of 1 mg of melatonin reduces glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. The present data may have both physiological and clinical implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01232.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cagnacci, A., Arangino, S., Renzi, A., Paoletti, A. M., Melis, G. B., Cagnacci, P., & Volpe, A.
Corresponding author
Cagnacci, Angelo
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-03
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
339-346
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W1988550244
Cited by
139
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
melatonin, glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, postmenopausal women, hormone replacement therapy, carbohydrate metabolism, C-peptide, aging
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Estradiol, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Melatonin, Middle Aged, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Linear Models, Postmenopause, Glucose Intolerance, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review