Cited by 114Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Psychiatry

Patients’ experience of involuntary psychiatric care: Good opportunities and great losses

JOHANSSON, I. M., LUNDMAN, B.·2002·Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Patients who are involuntary admitted to psychiatric care are extremely vulnerable as a consequence of the control from others, and of the personal limitations due to a psychiatric disease that can influence their own control of their lives. This group of patients are seldom asked about their experiences of being cared for. In this study five involuntary hospitalized psychiatric patients narrated their experience of being subjected to involuntary psychiatric care. The aim of the study was to obtain a deeper understanding of this experience. The interview text was analysed by means of a phenomenological hermeneutic method. The result of the analysis gave a complex picture of both support and violation. On the one hand experiences of not being seen or heard, of loss of liberty and of violation of integrity were found. On the other hand, there were experiences of respect and caring and opportunities to take responsibility for oneself were offered. Being treated involuntarily in psychiatric care was interpreted as a balancing act between good opportunities and great losses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2850.2002.00547.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JOHANSSON, I. M., & LUNDMAN, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
JOHANSSON, I. M.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
639-647
ISSN
  • 1351-0126 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2850
OpenAlex
W2152713438
Cited by
114
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
involuntary psychiatric treatment, involuntary admission, patient experience, psychiatric patients, loss of freedom, personal responsibility, vulnerability
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Psychiatric Nursing, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Personal Autonomy, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Patient Rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review