Cited by 530Malaria Research and ControlInsect Resistance and GeneticsDengue and Mosquito Control Research

Anopheles funestus resistant to pyrethroid insecticides in South Africa

Open access
Hargreaves, K., Koekemoer, L. L., Brooke, B. D., Hunt, R. H., Mthembu, J., Coetzee, M.·2000·Medical and Veterinary Entomology

Abstract

Summary: Northern Kwazulu/Natal (KZN) Province of South Africa borders on southern Mozambique, between Swaziland and the Indian Ocean. To control malaria vectors in KZN, houses were sprayed annually with residual DDT 2 g/m 2 until 1996 when the treatment changed to deltamethrin 20–25 mg/m 2 . At Ndumu (27°02′ S, 32°19′ E) the recorded malaria incidence increased more than six‐fold between 1995 and 1999. Entomological surveys during late 1999 found mosquitoes of the Anopheles funestus group (Diptera: Culicidae) resting in sprayed houses in some sectors of Ndumu area. This very endophilic vector of malaria had been eliminated from South Africa by DDT spraying in the 1950s, leaving the less endophilic An. arabiensis Patton as the only vector of known importance in KZN. Deltamethrin‐sprayed houses at Ndumu were checked for insecticide efficacy by bioassay using susceptible An. arabiensis (laboratory‐reared) that demonstrated 100% mortality. Members of the An. funestus group from Ndumu houses (29 males, 116 females) were identified by the rDNA PCR method and four species were found: 74 An. funestus Giles sensu stricto, 34 An. parensis Gillies , seven An. rivulorum Leeson and one An. leesoni Evans. Among An. funestus s.s. females, 5.4% (4/74) were positive for Plasmodium falciparum by ELISA and PCR tests. To test for pyrethroid resistance, mosquito adults were exposed to permethrin discriminating dosage and mortality scored 24 h post‐exposure: survival rates of wild‐caught healthy males were 5/10 An. funestus , 1/9 An. rivulorum and 0/2 An. parensis; survival rates of laboratory‐reared adult progeny from 19 An. funestus females averaged 14% (after 1 h exposure to 1% permethrin 25 : 75 cis : trans on papers in WHO test kits) and 27% (after 30 min in a bottle with 25 μg permethrin 40 : 60 cis : trans). Anopheles funestus families showing > 20% survival in these two resistance test procedures numbered 5/19 and 12/19, respectively. Progeny from 15 of the families were tested on 4% DDT impregnated papers and gave 100% mortality. Finding these proportions of pyrethroid‐resistant An. funestus , associated with a malaria upsurge at Ndumu, has serious implications for malaria vector control operations in southern Africa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00234.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • South Africa was forced to reintroduce DDT after failure of pyrethroids, due to one of the locally extinct vectors returning and having acquired pyrethroid resistance (not kdr-type) elsewhere.

    “South Africa was forced to reintroduce DDT after failure of pyrethroids, due to one of the locally extinct vectors returning and having acquired pyrethroid resistance (not kdr-type) elsewhere (Hargreaves et al. 2000).”

    From Global Status of DDT and Its Alternatives for Use in Vector Control to Prevent Disease (2009) · cites this paper as Hargreaves et al. 2000

    The Discussion (page not supplied) reports that An. funestus reinvaded northern KwaZulu-Natal after decades of absence and was pyrethroid-resistant but fully susceptible to DDT. It says switching back to DDT *would seem* a solution, not that South Africa had already reintroduced it. It also does not establish that the mosquitoes acquired resistance elsewhere or identify their resistance mechanism as non-kdr. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chandre, F., Darriet, F., Manga, L., Akogbeto, M., Faye, O., Mouchet, J. & Guillet, P. (1999a) Status of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 77, 230± 234.
  2. Experience and Components from Conventional Chemical Control (ed. by M. Laird and J. W. Miles), pp. 49±81. Academic Press, London.
  3. Park Ross, G.A. (1936) Insecticide as a major measure in the control of malaria, being an account of the methods and organizations put into force in Natal and Zululand during the past six years. Quarterly Bulletin of the Health Organization of the League of Nations, 5, 114±133.
  4. Ranson, H., Jensen, B., Vulule, J.M., Wang, X., Hemingway, J. & Collins, F.H. (2000) Identi®cation of a novel mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Anopheles gambiae asso- ciated with resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Insect Molecular Biology, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hargreaves, K., Koekemoer, L. L., Brooke, B. D., Hunt, R. H., Mthembu, J., & Coetzee, M.
Affiliations
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Coetzee, M.
Venue
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
181-189
ISSN
  • 0269-283X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2915
OpenAlex
W2158140165
Cited by
530
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 34
FWCI
18.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical and Veterinary Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
Keywords
pyrethroid resistance, permethrin, deltamethrin, malaria vectors, Anopheles arabiensis, DDT spraying, insecticide resistance, Plasmodium falciparum, malaria incidence, KwaZulu-Natal
MeSH terms
Africa, Southern, Animals, Anopheles, Drug Resistance, Female, Housing, Humans, Insect Control, Insecticides, Malaria, Male, Pyrethrins, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review