Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 537

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of variable regions in the genomes of tubercle bacilli using bacterial artificial chromosome arrays

Open access
Gordon, Stephen V., Brosch, Roland, Billault, Alain, Garnier, Thierry, Eiglmeier, Karin, Cole, Stewart T.·1999·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Whole‐genome comparisons of the tubercle bacilli were undertaken using ordered bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the vaccine strain, Mycobacterium bovis BCG‐Pasteur, together with the complete genome sequence of M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Restriction‐digested BAC arrays of M. tuberculosis H37Rv were used in hybridization experiments with radiolabelled M. bovis BCG genomic DNA to reveal the presence of 10 deletions (RD1–RD10) relative to M. tuberculosis. Seven of these regions, RD4–RD10, were also found to be deleted from M. bovis, with the three M. bovis BCG‐specific deletions being identical to the RD1–RD3 loci described previously. The distribution of RD4–RD10 in Mycobacterium africanum resembles that of M. tuberculosis more closely than that of M. bovis, whereas an intermediate arrangement was found in Mycobacterium microti, suggesting that the corresponding genes may affect host range and virulence of the various tubercle bacilli. Among the known products encoded by these loci are a copy of the proposed mycobacterial invasin Mce, three phospholipases, several PE, PPE and ESAT‐6 proteins, epoxide hydrolase and an insertion sequence. In a complementary approach, direct comparison of BACs uncovered a third class of deletions consisting of two M. tuberculosis H37Rv loci, RvD1 and RvD2, deleted from the genome relative to M. bovis BCG and M. bovis. These deletions affect a further seven genes, including a fourth phospholipase, plcD. In summary, the insertions and deletions described here have important implications for our understanding of the evolution of the tubercle complex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01383.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 537

Metadata

Authors
Gordon, S. V., Brosch, R., Billault, A., Garnier, T., Eiglmeier, K., & Cole, S. T.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-05
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
643-655
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2130206397
Cited by
537
References
25
FWCI
20.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of variable regions in the genomes of tubercle bacilli using bacterial artificial chromosome arrays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01383.x
The paper
Gordon, S. V., Brosch, R., Billault, A., Garnier, T., Eiglmeier, K., & Cole, S. T. (1999). Identification of variable regions in the genomes of tubercle bacilli using bacterial artificial chromosome arrays. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01383.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.