Cited by 46Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingBone health and osteoporosis research

Anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry in the assessment of body composition in elderly Finnish women

Open access
Haapala, Irja, Hirvonen, Anu, Niskanen, Leo, Uusitupa, Matti, Kröger, Heikki, Alhava, Esko, Nissinen, Aulikki·2002·Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging

Abstract

Summary: In this study, the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), skinfold thickness measurement (STM) and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA), as a reference method, were compared with each other in the assessment of body composition in elderly (62–72‐year‐old) Finnish women (n=93). BIA had better agreement with DXA in the assessment of fat free mass (FFM, R2=0·70, Sres=2·1) and fat mass (FM, R2=0·93, Sres=2·3) than the STM (FFM, R2=0·62, Sres=2·4; FM, R2=0·89,Sres=2·8). There was quite a large variation in the estimates when different BIA prediction equations were used. The equation developed in this study, FFM (kg)=−128·06 + 1·85 × BMI−0·63 × weight + 1·07 × height − 0·03 × resistance +10·0 × waist–hip ratio, yielded a small and unbiased error (0·5 ± 1·6 kg), with a small residual standard deviation (R2=0·83, Sres=1·6). However, error associated with the estimate of FM was positively related to the degree of FM. BIA(Heitmann) equation yielded unbiased estimates of both FFM and FM (FFM, R2=0·77, Sres=1·8; FM, R2=0·95, Sres=1·9). Both the STM and BIA (manufacturer's equation) resulted in error which was statistically significant and positively correlated with FFM and FM. These results indicate that BIA prediction equations, chosen with care, can improve the performance of equations based upon anthropometric measurements alone in the assessment of body composition in elderly women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1475-097x.2002.00447.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mazess RB. On ageing bone loss. Clin Orthop Res (1982); 165: 239-252.
  2. NIH. Consensus statement. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement. National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Statement 1994. Nutrition (1994); 12: 749- 762.
  3. Steen B, Isaksson B, Svanborg A. Body composition at 70 and 75 years of age -a longitudinal population study. J Clin Exp Gerontol (1979); 1: 185-200.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haapala, I., Hirvonen, A., Niskanen, L., Uusitupa, M., Kröger, H., Alhava, E., & Nissinen, A.
Affiliations
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Haapala, Irja
Venue
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
383-391
ISSN
  • 1475-0961 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-097X
OpenAlex
W2136910460
Cited by
46
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Juho Vainion Säätiö
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
body composition, bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, skinfold thickness, fat-free mass, fat mass, prediction equations, older women, anthropometry, measurement agreement
MeSH terms
Aged, Body Composition, Body Weight, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Finland, Humans, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Absorptiometry, Photon, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review