Cited by 55Wound Healing and TreatmentsChemokine receptors and signalingBurn Injury Management and Outcomes

Impaired healing of nitrogen mustard wounds in CXCR2 null mice

Open access
Milatovic, Snjezana, Nanney, Lillian B., Yu, Yingchun, White, John R., Richmond, Ann·2003·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

To examine the significance of chemokine activation of CXCR2 in wound healing after chemical burn, cutaneous injury was created by topical application of nitrogen mustard on CXCR2 wild type (+/+), heterozygous (+/–), and knockout (–/–) mice. Wounds were analyzed histologically for neutrophil and monocyte infiltration and for reepithelialization at postwound days 4, 7, and 10. Neutrophil recruitment to the wound site was reduced through postwound day 7 in CXCR2 –/– mice as indicated by myeloperoxidase assay and by visual quantitation. Because there is always concern that mice with targeted deletion of a specific receptor may undergo developmental adaptations to offset the loss of the receptor, we also accessed chemical wound repair in the presence of a small molecule antagonist of CXCR2. Dietary supplementation with a CXCR2 antagonist (SB‐265610) during the wound repair process also markedly delayed healing parameters in CXCR2 +/+ mice, even greater than treatment with glucocorticoids. These parallel studies further establish that mice deficient in CXCR2 function exhibit delayed cutaneous wound healing that may be primarily linked to impaired neutrophil recruitment after chemical burn with nitrogen mustard. Thus, there may be a potential therapeutic benefit of treating nitrogen mustard‐induced skin lesions with agonists of CXCR2 to facilitate the wound repair process. (WOUND REP REG 2003;11:213–219)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2003.11310.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CXCR2−/− mice display impaired neutrophil recruitment and delayed wound healing.

    “CXCR2−/− mice display impaired neutrophil recruitment and delayed wound healing.47,48”

    From The Innate Immune System in Acute and Chronic Wounds (2016) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]Leeson TS, Leeson CR, Paparo AA. General histological principles and primary tissues text/atlas of histology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1988. pp. 206–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. [13]Nanney L, Mueller S, Bueno R, Peiper S, Richmond A. Distributions of MGSA/GRO and the IL-8 receptor B in wound repair. Am J Path. 1995;147:1248–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milatovic, S., Nanney, L. B., Yu, Y., White, J. R., & Richmond, A.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Centre for Cancer Biology (AU)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Richmond, Ann
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
213-219
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W2035570125
Cited by
55
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK6 BX005225)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA034590)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 40437, R01GM040437)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30AR041943, P30-AR41943)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Keywords
CXCR2, wound healing, nitrogen mustard, skin wounds, neutrophil recruitment, chemokines, CXCR2 antagonist, re-epithelialization, chemical burns, glucocorticoids
MeSH terms
Animals, Burns, Chemical, Mechlorethamine, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Peroxidase, Neutrophils, Prednisolone, Time Factors, Wound Healing, Wounds and Injuries, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mice, Knockout, Receptors, Chemokine, Receptors, Interleukin-8B, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review