Cited by 247Particle Detector Development and PerformanceRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesPlanetary Science and Exploration

The Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) Investigation

Hassler, D. M., Zeitlin, C., Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Böttcher, S., Martin, C., Andrews, J., Böhm, E., Brinza, D. E. +17 more·2012·Space Science Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11214-012-9913-1

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fidelity of GEANT4 in describing the detector response to neutral particles was verified in several calibration runs at Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt and The Svedberg Laboratory.

    “The fidelity of GEANT4 in describing the response of the detector to neutral particles correctly was verified in several calibration runs at Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt and The Svedberg Laboratory [Hassler et al., 2012].”

    From Measurements of the neutron spectrum on the Martian surface with MSL/RAD (2014) · cites this paper as Hassler et al., 2012

  • Since Curiosity's landing, the RAD has been measuring the energetic particle radiation environment on the surface of Mars with roughly 30 min cadence.

    “Since Curiosity's landing, the RAD has been measuring the energetic particle radiation environment [Hassler et al., 2012[Hassler et al., , 2014] ] on the surface of Mars with roughly 30 min cadence.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hassler, D. M., Zeitlin, C., Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Böttcher, S., Martin, C., Andrews, J., Böhm, E., Brinza, D. E., Bullock, M. A., Burmeister, S., Ehresmann, B., Epperly, M., Grinspoon, D., Köhler, J., Kortmann, O., Neal, K., Peterson, J., Posner, A., Rafkin, S., Seimetz, L., Smith, K. D., Tyler, Y., Weigle, G., Reitz, G., & Cucinotta, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Southwest Research Institute (US)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
  • Denver Museum of Nature and Science (US)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hassler, D. M.
Venue
Space Science Reviews
Published
2012-07-14
Volume
170
Issue
1-4
Pages
503-558
ISSN
  • 0038-6308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9672
OpenAlex
W2067179091
Cited by
247
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Space Science Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle Detector Development and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
Radiation Assessment Detector, Mars Science Laboratory, Mars radiation environment, galactic cosmic rays, solar energetic particles, secondary neutrons, Martian regolith, silicon PIN diodes, plastic scintillators, mixed-signal ASIC, FPGA, on-board processing, autonomous operation, habitability, human Mars missions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review