Cited by 470Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsHeart rate and cardiovascular health

The prognosis of heart failure in the general population: the Rotterdam Study

Open access
Mosterd, A·2001·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the prognosis, cause of death, and its determinants in participants of the population-based Rotterdam Study who were found to have heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 5255 Rotterdam Study participants (aged 68.9+/-8.6 years, 3113 women) the presence of heart failure was determined. Data were analysed with Cox's proportional-hazards models. One hundred and eighty-one participants (age 77.3+/-7.9 years, 109 women) had heart failure. Of these 85 (47%) died during the 4.8-8.5 (mean 6.1) years of follow-up. One, 2 and 5 years' survival was 89%, 79%, and 59%, representing an age-adjusted mortality twice that of persons without heart failure (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-2.7). The hazard ratio for sudden death was even more pronounced: 4.8, (95% CI 2.6-8.7). Diabetes mellitus, impairment of renal function and atrial fibrillation were associated with a poor outcome. A higher blood pressure and body mass index conferred a more favourable prognosis in those with heart failure. CONCLUSION: Heart failure generally afflicts older subjects in the community, carries a poor prognosis, especially in the presence of concomitant diseases, and confers a fivefold increase in the risk of sudden death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/euhj.2000.2533

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mosterd, A.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Mosterd, A
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2001-08-01
Volume
22
Issue
15
Pages
1318-1327
ISSN
0195-668X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082800364
Cited by
470
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
FWCI
16.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
heart failure, prognosis, mortality, sudden death, older adults, community-dwelling population, diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, blood pressure, body mass index, Rotterdam Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prognosis, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Survival Analysis, Death, Sudden, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review