Cited by 486Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Body composition and prognosis in chronic systolic heart failure: the obesity paradox

Lavie, Carl J., Osman, Ahmed F., Milani, Richard V., Mehra, Mandeep R.·2003·The American Journal of Cardiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00031-6

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 'obesity paradox' has been described in a variety of disease processes, including other gynecologic cancers.

    “The “obesity paradox”, which suggest a positive association between increasing BMI as it pertains to a specific disease, was firstly reported in heart failure31, but has since been described in a variety of disease processes, including other gynecologic cancers32–34.”
  • A paradoxical survival advantage with higher BMI exists in the elderly and in a broad range of illnesses, including diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure, acute heart failure, coronary artery disease, and percutaneous coronary artery interventions.

    “the case is strong that such a paradoxical relation exists in the elderly, 7 and accompanying a broad range of illnesses, including diabetes mellitus, 8 chronic heart failure, 9,10 acute heart failure, 11 coronary artery disease, 12 and percutaneous coronary artery interventions.13”
  • A growing number of recent reports document a statistically significant survival benefit in obese patients once they have been diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases.

    “While it is widely accepted that obesity increases the risk of developing heart disease, a growing number of recent reports document a statistically significant survival benefit in obese patients once they have been diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (128, 144, 145, 200, 201, 211, 244).”

    From Cardiac remodeling in obesity (2008) · cites this paper as [201]

  • In a stable outpatient cohort, obese patients had better survival than normal-weight patients with comparable severity of heart failure.

    “For example, follow-up examination of a stable outpatient cohort showed that obese patients had better survival than normal-weight patients with comparable severity of heart failure (201).”

    From Cardiac remodeling in obesity (2008) · cites this paper as [201]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lavie, C. J., Osman, A. F., Milani, R. V., & Mehra, M. R.
Affiliations
Ochsner Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lavie, Carl J.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
91
Issue
7
Pages
891-894
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081209712
Cited by
486
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Keywords
obesity paradox, chronic systolic heart failure, body composition, body fat percentage, body mass index, survival, prognosis, NYHA functional class
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Body Composition, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Louisiana, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Oxygen Consumption, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Stroke Volume, Systole, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review