Cited by 6Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone Metabolism and DiseasesAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

The association between osteocalcin and C-reactive protein; A relation of bone with inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Fatahi, Somaye, Ghaedi, Ehsan, Mousavi, Seyed Mohammad, Bawadi, Hiba, Rahmani, Jamal, Pezeshki, Mehran, Varkaneh, Hamed Kord·2019·Hormone and Metabolic Research

Abstract

Abstract A meta-analysis was performed to summarize the evidence from observational studies regarding the association between serum osteocalcin (OC) and C-reactive protein (CRP). A systemic research of the literature databases including PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar was performed to identify the relevant studies up to March 2018. We used the random-effects model by the method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate the overall effect size. Q-test and I 2-statistics were used to assess between-study heterogeneity. In addition, we did subgroup analysis to detect possible sources of heterogeneity based on BMI range, gender, type of study population and age. We identified 21studies of association between serum osteocalcin and CRP eligible for the meta-analysis. The overall effect size showed a significant inverse association between OC and CRP (Fisher’s z=–0.127; 95% CI: –0.166, –0.088, p<0.0001). However, the significant chi-squared statistic result, indicates a heterogeneity of effect sizes (I 2=61.6, df=20, p<0.0001). The subgroup analysis found BMI range, type of study population, and age were the potential sources of heterogeneity. In addition, the strongest correlation was observed in the subgroup of obese subjects (Fisher’s z=–0.264, p=0.002), less than 40 years old (Fisher’s z=–0.115, p<0.0001) and healthy subjects (Fisher’s z=–0.115, p<0.0001). These findings suggest that there is a significant inverse association between serum OC and CRP levels in the adult population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-0897-844

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fatahi, S., Ghaedi, E., Mousavi, S. M., Bawadi, H., Rahmani, J., Pezeshki, M., & Varkaneh, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • Student Research Committee, Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Venue
Hormone and Metabolic Research
Published
2019-06
Volume
51
Issue
06
Pages
353-361
ISSN
  • 0018-5043 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-4286
OpenAlex
W2949173291
Cited by
6
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormone and Metabolic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
osteocalcin, C-reactive protein, bone, inflammation, obesity, body mass index, serum biomarkers, bone remodeling, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Bone Diseases, C-Reactive Protein, Humans, Inflammation, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Osteocalcin, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review