Cited by 286Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer survivorship and careMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Recognition and management of treatment-related side effects for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy

Open access
Cella, David, Fallowfield, Lesley J.·2008·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

In postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer, the use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) to suppress estrogen is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with tamoxifen therapy. Women receiving such endocrine therapy may experience treatment-related side effects that negatively affect health-related quality of life (QoL) and adherence to therapy. In published clinical trials and in clinical practice, adverse events (AEs) constitute the main reason for nonadherence to endocrine treatment. Serious AEs are sometimes resolved by switching to a different agent, whereas other side effects can often be managed to allow patients to remain on therapy without sacrificing QoL. Across all adjuvant endocrine trials, regardless of the treatment received, vasomotor symptoms such as hot flashes are the most common side effects. Other frequently reported side effects, such as vaginal discharge, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, and arthralgia, vary in prevalence between tamoxifen and AIs. Here we provide an overview of reported AEs of adjuvant endocrine therapy, focusing on those that are amenable to pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic management without treatment discontinuation. Also highlighted are specific management strategies that may improve patient QoL and thereby optimize adherence to therapy, which in turn might improve patient outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10549-007-9548-1

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cella, D., & Fallowfield, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
Corresponding author
Cella, David
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2007-09-18
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
167-180
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W2034100757
Cited by
286
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
breast cancer, adjuvant endocrine therapy, aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, treatment-related adverse events, medication adherence, health-related quality of life, vasomotor symptoms, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, joint pain, adverse event management, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
MeSH terms
Aromatase, Breast Neoplasms, Clinical Trials as Topic, Endocrine System, Female, Humans, Medical Oncology, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tamoxifen, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review