Cited by 1,262Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentImmune cells in cancerBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Survival in Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Open access
Steidl, Christian, Lee, Tang, Shah, Sohrab P., Farinha, Pedro, Han, Guangming, Nayar, Tarun, Delaney, Allen, Jones, Steven J. +17 more·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in treatments for Hodgkin's lymphoma, about 20% of patients still die from progressive disease. Current prognostic models predict the outcome of treatment with imperfect accuracy, and clinically relevant biomarkers have not been established to improve on the International Prognostic Score. METHODS: Using gene-expression profiling, we analyzed 130 frozen samples obtained from patients with classic Hodgkin's lymphoma during diagnostic lymph-node biopsy to determine which cellular signatures were correlated with treatment outcome. We confirmed our findings in an independent cohort of 166 patients, using immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: Gene-expression profiling identified a gene signature of tumor-associated macrophages that was significantly associated with primary treatment failure (P=0.02). In an independent cohort of patients, we found that an increased number of CD68+ macrophages was correlated with a shortened progression-free survival (P=0.03) and with an increased likelihood of relapse after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (P=0.008), resulting in shortened disease-specific survival (P=0.003). In multivariate analysis, this adverse prognostic factor outperformed the International Prognostic Score for disease-specific survival (P=0.003 vs. P=0.03). The absence of an elevated number of CD68+ cells in patients with limited-stage disease defined a subgroup of patients with a long-term disease-specific survival of 100% with the use of current treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: An increased number of tumor-associated macrophages was strongly associated with shortened survival in patients with classic Hodgkin's lymphoma and provides a new biomarker for risk stratification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0905680

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Björkholm M Axdorph U Grimfors G Fixed versus response-adapted MOPP/ABVD chemotherapy in Hodgkin's disease: a prospective randomized trial Ann Oncol 1995 6 895 9 8624292

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steidl, C., Lee, T., Shah, S. P., Farinha, P., Han, G., Nayar, T., Delaney, A., Jones, S. J., Iqbal, J., Weisenburger, D. D., Bast, M. A., Rosenwald, A., Muller-Hermelink, H.-K., Rimsza, L. M., Campo, E., Delabie, J., Braziel, R. M., Cook, J. R., Tubbs, R. R., Jaffe, E. S., Lenz, G., Connors, J. M., Staudt, L. M., Chan, W. C., & Gascoyne, R. D.
Affiliations
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-03-11
Volume
362
Issue
10
Pages
875-885
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2034400622
Cited by
1,262
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 103
FWCI
79.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ca114778-05)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (178536)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01-CA-114778, U01-CA114778-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
tumor-associated macrophages, CD68, prognostic factors, progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, International Prognostic Score, gene expression signatures, risk stratification
MeSH terms
CD68 Molecule, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Child, Female, Hodgkin Disease, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lymph Nodes, Macrophages, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, RNA, Neoplasm, Biomarkers, Tumor, Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic, Antigens, CD, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Rate, Reed-Sternberg Cells, Treatment Failure, Disease-Free Survival, Gene Expression Profiling, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review