Cited by 281Diabetes and associated disordersInfant Nutrition and HealthDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dietary Intervention in Infancy and Later Signs of Beta-Cell Autoimmunity

Open access
Knip, Mikael, Virtanen, Suvi M., Seppä, Karri, Ilonen, Jorma, Savilahti, Erkki, Vaarala, Outi, Reunanen, Antti, Teramo, Kari, Hämäläinen, Anu-Maaria, Paronen, Johanna, Dosch, Hans-Michael, Hakulinen, Timo, Åkerblom, Hans K.·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early exposure to complex dietary proteins may increase the risk of beta-cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes in children with genetic susceptibility. We tested the hypothesis that supplementing breast milk with highly hydrolyzed milk formula would decrease the cumulative incidence of diabetes-associated autoantibodies in such children. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned 230 infants with HLA-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes and at least one family member with type 1 diabetes to receive either a casein hydrolysate formula or a conventional, cow's-milk-based formula (control) whenever breast milk was not available during the first 6 to 8 months of life. Autoantibodies to insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), the insulinoma-associated 2 molecule (IA-2), and zinc transporter 8 were analyzed with the use of radiobinding assays, and islet-cell antibodies were analyzed with the use of immunofluorescence, during a median observation period of 10 years (mean, 7.5). The children were monitored for incident type 1 diabetes until they were 10 years of age. RESULTS: The unadjusted hazard ratio for positivity for one or more autoantibodies in the casein hydrolysate group, as compared with the control group, was 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.95), and the hazard ratio adjusted for an observed difference in the duration of exposure to the study formula was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.91). The unadjusted hazard ratio for positivity for two or more autoantibodies was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.21 to 1.17), and the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.19 to 1.07). The rate of reported adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary intervention during infancy appears to have a long-lasting effect on markers of beta-cell autoimmunity--markers that may reflect an autoimmune process leading to type 1 diabetes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00570102.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1004809

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.2337/diabetes.46.4.557 · DOI
  2. 10.2337/diabetes.46.7.1133 · DOI
  3. 10.2337/diabetes.46.11.1711 · DOI
  4. Sjoroos M, 1995, Biotechniques, 18, 870
  5. Visser JT, 2009, Eur J Immunol, 39, S674

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Knip, M., Virtanen, S. M., Seppä, K., Ilonen, J., Savilahti, E., Vaarala, O., Reunanen, A., Teramo, K., Hämäläinen, A.-M., Paronen, J., Dosch, H.-M., Hakulinen, T., & Åkerblom, H. K.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-11-11
Volume
363
Issue
20
Pages
1900-1908
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1227874083
Cited by
281
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 39
FWCI
18.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Mead Johnson Nutrition
  • Helsingin Yliopisto
  • Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
  • European Commission (BMH4-CT96-0233)
  • Academy of Finland
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden
  • Tays
  • Diabetestutkimussäätiö
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U01HD040364)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, islet autoimmunity, dietary intervention, breast milk supplementation, diabetes-associated autoantibodies, insulin autoantibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase, IA-2, zinc transporter 8, islet cell antibodies, HLA-DQ2/DQ8, genetic susceptibility, infant feeding
MeSH terms
Animals, Autoantibodies, Caseins, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Double-Blind Method, Histocompatibility Testing, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Milk, Milk, Human, Pilot Projects, Biomarkers, Autoimmunity, Disease Progression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Infant Formula, Insulin-Secreting Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review