Cited by 2,161Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation

Open access
Sanna, Tommaso, Diener, Hans-Christoph, Passman, Rod S., Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo, Bernstein, Richard A., Morillo, Carlos A., Rymer, Marilyn Mollman, Thijs, Vincent +4 more·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend at least 24 hours of electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring after an ischemic stroke to rule out atrial fibrillation. However, the most effective duration and type of monitoring have not been established, and the cause of ischemic stroke remains uncertain despite a complete diagnostic evaluation in 20 to 40% of cases (cryptogenic stroke). Detection of atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke has therapeutic implications. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled study of 441 patients to assess whether long-term monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) is more effective than conventional follow-up (control) for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Patients 40 years of age or older with no evidence of atrial fibrillation during at least 24 hours of ECG monitoring underwent randomization within 90 days after the index event. The primary end point was the time to first detection of atrial fibrillation (lasting >30 seconds) within 6 months. Among the secondary end points was the time to first detection of atrial fibrillation within 12 months. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: By 6 months, atrial fibrillation had been detected in 8.9% of patients in the ICM group (19 patients) versus 1.4% of patients in the control group (3 patients) (hazard ratio, 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 21.7; P<0.001). By 12 months, atrial fibrillation had been detected in 12.4% of patients in the ICM group (29 patients) versus 2.0% of patients in the control group (4 patients) (hazard ratio, 7.3; 95% CI, 2.6 to 20.8; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECG monitoring with an ICM was superior to conventional follow-up for detecting atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke. (Funded by Medtronic; CRYSTAL AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00924638.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1313600

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the CRYSTAL-AF study, AF was detected in 29% of cryptogenic stroke patients who underwent 1 year of cardiac monitoring with an implantable cardiac loop recorder.

    “In the recent CRYSTAL-AF study, AF was detected in 29% of cryptogenic stroke patients who underwent 1 year of cardiac monitoring with an implantable cardiac loop recorder (3).”

    From Diagnostic Yield of Extended Cardiac Patch Monitoring in Patients with Stroke or TIA (2015) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Secondary End Points (p. 4) report that atrial fibrillation was detected at 12 months in 12.4% of the implantable-monitor group—29 patients, not 29%. The claim appears to mistake the number of patients for the percentage. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In CRYSTAL-AF, the yield of AF detection at 6, 12, and 36 months was 8.9, 12.4, and 30%.

    “In this study, the yield of AF detection at 6, 12, and 36 months was 8.9, 12.4, and 30% (3).”
  • Of 208 patients who had ILR insertions as part of the CRYSTAL AF trial, 5 (2.4%) had their devices removed because of infection or pocket erosion at the insertion site.

    “Of 208 patients who had undergone ILR insertions as a part of the CRYSTAL AF trial, 5 (2.4%) patients had their devices removed because of infection or pocket erosion at the insertion site [15].”
  • There is good evidence that prolonged ECG monitoring enhances the detection of undiagnosed AF, for 72 hours after a stroke, for even longer periods, or by daily short-term ECG recording in patients over 75 years of age.

    “There is good evidence that prolonged ECG monitoring enhances the detection of undiagnosed AF, for 72 hours after a stroke, 27,127 for even longer periods, 18,128 or by daily short-term ECG recording in patients over 75 years of age 129 (Web Addenda Figure 1).”
  • AF detection is more likely in patients with cryptogenic stroke implanted with loop recorders or who have had ECG monitors for several weeks.

    “AF detection is not uncommon in unselected stroke patients (6.2%, 95% CI 4.4-8.3),128 but is more likely in patients with cryptogenic stroke implanted with loop recorders or who have had ECG monitors for several weeks.18,128,152”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]6. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Stroke 1993;24: 35-41.
  2. [22]22. invasive cardiac monitoring. Stroke Res Treat 2011;2011:172074.
  3. [24]24. Stroke 2013;44:528-30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanna, T., Diener, H.-C., Passman, R. S., Di Lazzaro, V., Bernstein, R. A., Morillo, C. A., Rymer, M. M., Thijs, V., Rogers, T., Beckers, F., Lindborg, K., & Brachmann, J.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Population Health Research Institute (CA)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Medtronic (United States) (US)
  • Medtronic (Netherlands) (NL)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-06-26
Volume
370
Issue
26
Pages
2478-2486
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2065028337
Cited by
2,161
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 126 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 160 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 204 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 176 · 2019: 203 · 2018: 172 · 2017: 187 · 2016: 192 · 2015: 165 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
135.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
cryptogenic stroke, atrial fibrillation, implantable cardiac monitors, long-term ECG monitoring, ischemic stroke, post-stroke follow-up, atrial fibrillation detection, stroke etiology
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review