Cited by 596International Business and FDIManagement and Organizational StudiesInnovation and Knowledge Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International business responses to institutional voids

Open access
Doh, Jonathan, Rodrigues, Suzana, Saka-Helmhout, Ayse, Makhija, Mona·2017·Journal of International Business Studies

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41267-017-0074-z

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 119 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Boddewyn, J., & Doh, J. P. 2011. Global strategy and the collaboration of MNEs, governments and NGOs for the provisioning of collective goods in emerging markets. Global Strategy Journal, 1: 345–361. · DOI
  2. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. 2010. (with Richard Bullock).Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 596

Metadata

Authors
Doh, J., Rodrigues, S., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Makhija, M.
Affiliations
  • Villanova University (US)
  • Universidade Fundação Mineira de Educação e Cultura (BR)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Makhija, Mona
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2017-04
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
293-307
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W2604697132
Cited by
596
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 11
FWCI
70.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • ERIM Top-Core Articles
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
institutional voids, business strategy, corporate structure, transaction costs, internalization, substitution, borrowing, signaling, economic institutions, social institutions, firm behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review