Cited by 72Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

On relativistic spin network vertices

Open access
Reisenberger, Michael P.·1999·Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract

Barrett and Crane have proposed a model of simplicial Euclidean quantum gravity in which a central role is played by a class of Spin(4) spin networks called “relativistic spin networks” which satisfy a series of physically motivated constraints. Here a proof is presented that demonstrates that the intertwiner of a vertex of such a spin network is uniquely determined, up to normalization, by the representations on the incident edges and the constraints. Moreover, the constraints, which were formulated for four valent spin networks only, are extended to networks of arbitrary valence, and the generalized relativistic spin networks proposed by Yetter are shown to form the entire solution set (mod normalization) of the extended constraints. Finally, using the extended constraints, the Barrett–Crane model is generalized to arbitrary polyhedral complexes (instead of just simplicial complexes) representing space-time. It is explained how this model, like the Barret–Crane model can be derived from BF theory, a simple topological field theory [G. Horowitz, Commun. Math. Phys. 125, 417 (1989)], by restricting the sum over histories to ones in which the left-handed and right-handed areas of any 2-surface are equal. It is known that the solutions of classical Euclidean general relativity form a branch of the stationary points of the BF action with respect to variations preserving this condition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.532850

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The state space of strong solutions of the quadratic quantum Plebanski constraints is one-dimensional and given by the Barrett-Crane intertwiner.

    “Indeed, it has been shown that the state space of strong solutions of the quadratic quantum Plebanski constraints is one dimensional and it is given by the BC intertwiner |BC⟩ [313].”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [313]

  • The EPRL and Freidel-Krasnov derivations produced a new, consistent spin-foam model valid for the Barbero-Immirzi parameter in the interval -1 ≤ γ ≤ 1.

    “The result of their effort is a new, consistent spin-foam model valid for the Barbero-Immirzi parameter belonging to the interval -1 ≤ γ ≤ 1, a promising candidate for a path integral formulation of LQG, and two different models for | γ | > 1 [14-16]”

    From Spin-foams for all loop quantum gravity (2010) · cites this paper as [16]

  • There are two different spin-foam models for |γ| > 1.

    “The result of their effort is a new, consistent spin-foam model valid for the Barbero-Immirzi parameter belonging to the interval -1 ≤ γ ≤ 1, a promising candidate for a path integral formulation of LQG, and two different models for | γ | > 1 [14-16]”

    From Spin-foams for all loop quantum gravity (2010) · cites this paper as [16]

  • Under suitable conditions, a fat graph can be put in correspondence with a four-dimensional triangulated manifold, so the sum over Feynman graphs is a sum over triangulations.

    “In fact, under suitable conditions [92,93], a fat graph can be put in correspondence with a four-dimensional triangulated manifold, so that the sum over Feynman graphs is a sum over triangulations.”
  • Fat graphs representing Feynman diagrams are in direct correspondence with 2-complexes, which can be interpreted as the dual 2-skeleton of a triangulation.

    “More precisely [92,93], the fat graphs representing Feynman diagrams of our field theory are in direct correspondence with 2-complexes, as we have seen, that can in turn be interpreted as the dual 2-skeleton of a triangulation”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [Pen69] R. Penrose. Angular momentum: an approach to combinatorial spacetime. In T. Bastin, editor, Quantum theory and beyond , 1969. Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reisenberger, M. P.
Affiliations
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
Corresponding author
Reisenberger, Michael P.
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Published
1999-04-01
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
2046-2054
ISSN
  • 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7658
OpenAlex
W2118522035
Cited by
72
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Barrett-Crane model, polyhedral complexes, simplicial quantum gravity, BF theory, topological field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review