Cited by 379Geometric and Algebraic TopologyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models

TOPOLOGICAL LATTICE MODELS IN FOUR DIMENSIONS

Open access
OOGURI, HIROSI·1992·Modern Physics Letters A

Abstract

We define a lattice statistical model on a triangulated manifold in four dimensions associated to a group G. When G= SU (2), the statistical weight is constructed from the 15j-symbol as well as the 6j-symbol for recombination of angular momenta, and the model may be regarded as the four-dimensional version of the Ponzano-Regge model. We show that the partition function of the model is invariant under the Alexander moves of the simplicial complex, thus it depends only on the piecewise linear topology of the manifold. For an orientable manifold, the model is related to the so-called BF model. The q-analog of the model is also constructed, and it is argued that its partition function is invariant under the Alexander moves. It is discussed how to realize the 't Hooft operator in these models associated to a closed surface in four dimensions as well as the Wilson operator associated to a closed loop. Correlation functions of these operators in the q-deformed version of the model would define a new type of invariants of knots and links in four dimensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0217732392004171

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our expression for the proper time propagator U(T) of GR as a sum over worldsheets resembles in many ways the worldsheet sum for the projector on physical states, U_OCY, of the OCY model.

    “More specifically, our expression for the proper time propagator U ( T ) of GR as a sum over worldsheets resembles in many ways the worldsheet sum [8,56] 14 for the projector on physical states, U OCY , of the OCY model.”

    From “Sum over surfaces” form of loop quantum gravity (1997) · cites this paper as [8]

  • BF theory and simplicial GR are theories with crossing symmetric vertices.

    “BF theory [11] and simplicial GR [8,9] are theories of this kind, and have crossing symmetric vertices.”

    From “Sum over surfaces” form of loop quantum gravity (1997) · cites this paper as [8]

  • A branched colored surface σ can be interpreted as a discrete ('quantum') geometry.

    “There is a natural way of interpreting a branched colored surface σ as a discrete ('quantum') geometry. This geometrical interpretation was proposed in [8] in a slightly different context; it holds in the worldsheet formulation of the simplicial model of GR [9].”

    From “Sum over surfaces” form of loop quantum gravity (1997) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 8 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1][1] M.E. Agishtein and A.A. Migdal, Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 1863; J. Ambjorn and S. Varsted, Phys. Lett. B226 (1991) 258; D.V. Boulatov and A. Krzywicki, Mod. Phys. Letts A6 (1991) 3005; J. Ambjorn, D. Boulatov, A. Krzywicki and S. Varsted, preprint NBI-HE-91-46 (1991). -
  2. [2][2] M.E. Agishtein and A.A. Migdal, preprint PUPT-1287 (1991), PUPT- (1992); J. Ambjorn and J. Jurkiewicz, preprint NBI-HE-91-47 (1991). -
  3. [5][5] D.V. Boulatov, preprint SPhT/92-017 (1992) -
  4. [7][7] M. Gross and S. Varsted, preprint NBI-HE-91-33 (1991) -
  5. [12][12] V.G. Turaev, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, t. 313, S´ erie I (1991) 395; K. Walker, ' On Witten's 3 -Manifold Invariants ,' preprint (1990). -
  6. [13][13] H. Ooguri and N. Sasakura, Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 3591; H. Ooguri, preprint RIMS-851 (1991), to be published in Nucl. Phys. B . -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OOGURI, H.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
OOGURI, HIROSI
Venue
Modern Physics Letters A
Published
1992-09-28
Volume
07
Issue
30
Pages
2799-2810
ISSN
  • 0217-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6632
OpenAlex
W2171017579
Cited by
379
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 29
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Keywords
triangulated manifolds, Ponzano-Regge model, 6j symbols, piecewise linear topology, BF model, q-deformation, Wilson loops, SU(2) gauge theory, four-dimensional quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review