Cited by 37DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryEnzyme Structure and FunctionDNA Repair Mechanisms

Discrimination against purine–pyrimidine mispairs in the polymerase active site of DNA polymerase I: A structural explanation

Open access
Minnick, Dana T., Liu, Lixing, Grindley, Nigel D. F., Kunkel, Thomas A., Joyce, Catherine M.·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We previously identified five derivatives of Klenow fragment DNA polymerase that have lower fidelity because of amino acid substitutions in the polymerase active site. One of these has alanine substituted for the invariant Glu-710, whose side chain interacts with the deoxyribose of the incoming dNTP. Here we show that the E710A enzyme has reduced fidelity for five of the 12 possible mismatches. All but one of these involve misinsertion of pyrimidines, including two transition mismatches A-dCTP and G-dTTP. In contrast, E710A polymerase error rates for the reciprocal C-dATP and T-dGTP transition mismatches were similar to those of the wild-type enzyme. The kinetics of formation of correct base pairs and transition mismatches by the wild-type and E710A polymerases, combined with information on the structure of the DNA polymerase active site and the asymmetry of wobble base pairs, provides a plausible explanation for the differential effects of the E710A mutation on fidelity. The data suggest that the Glu-710 side chain plays a pivotal role in excluding wobble base pairs between template pyrimidines and purine triphosphates by steric clash. Moreover, this same side chain enhances the stability of incoming correct dNTPs, such that loss of this interaction on removal of the side chain leads to lower selectivity against mismatches involving incoming pyrimidines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.032457899

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These base substitution errors may be minor forms resulting from wobble base pairing, tautomerization, ionization, or anti-syn rotations of bases.

    “These may be minor forms resulting from wobble base pairing (e.g.Ref. 43), tautomerization, ionization, or anti-syn rotations of bases (33).”

    From DNA Replication Fidelity (2004) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minnick, D. T., Liu, L., Grindley, N. D. F., Kunkel, T. A., & Joyce, C. M.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Minnick, Dana T.
  • Liu, Lixing
  • Joyce, Catherine M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-02-05
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
1194-1199
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2089845127
Cited by
37
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-28550, R01GM028550)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
DNA polymerase I, Klenow fragment, mismatch discrimination, polymerase fidelity, wobble pairing, steric clashes, active site structure
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Deoxyribonucleotides, DNA Polymerase I, Kinetics, Protein Conformation, Purines, Pyrimidines, Recombinant Proteins, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Amino Acid Substitution, Base Pair Mismatch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review