The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 78 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems
Open accessAbstract
On the basis of task-related imaging studies in normal human subjects, it has been suggested that two attention systems exist in the human brain: a bilateral dorsal attention system involved in top-down orienting of attention and a right-lateralized ventral attention system involved in reorienting attention in response to salient sensory stimuli. An important question is whether this functional organization emerges only in response to external attentional demands or is represented more fundamentally in the internal dynamics of brain activity. To address this question, we examine correlations in spontaneous fluctuations of the functional MRI blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the absence of task, stimuli, or explicit attentional demands. We identify a bilateral dorsal attention system and a right-lateralized ventral attention system solely on the basis of spontaneous activity. Further, we observe regions in the prefrontal cortex correlated with both systems, a potential mechanism for mediating the functional interaction between systems. These findings demonstrate that the neuroanatomical substrates of human attention persist in the absence of external events, reflected in the correlation structure of spontaneous activity.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Spontaneous BOLD fluctuations in resting-state fMRI are sufficient to recover the dorsal and ventral human attention systems, with the dorsal system bilateral and the ventral system right-lateralized. The two systems are largely segregated, with prefrontal overlap suggesting a possible interaction site.
Key findings
- Four attention seed regions—IPS and FEF (dorsal), TPJ and VFC (ventral)—partition into two systems on the basis of spontaneous activity: IPS/FEF and TPJ/VFC correlations were significantly stronger than any other region pair (all region pairs not equally correlated, F(5,45)=23.70, P<0.0001; pairwise P<0.005).
- Correlation-map similarity and overlap also separated the systems: spatial correlation across maps differed significantly (F(5,45)=15.54, P<0.0001), as did fractional overlap (F(5,45)=17.04, P<0.0001), with IPS/FEF and TPJ/VFC pairs most similar/overlapping.
- Dorsal maps were bilateral, whereas ventral maps were right-lateralized: laterality differed by spatial correlation (F(3,27)=28.28, P<0.0001) and fractional overlap (F(3,27)=39.79, P<0.0001); IPS/FEF maps were significantly more bilateral than VFC/TPJ maps (spatial correlation P<0.05; overlap P<0.006).
- Intrinsically defined dorsal and ventral systems were largely segregated; overlap regions were found in right middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal cortex, with the prefrontal regions suggested as possible interaction sites after controlling for nonneuronal factors.
Methods
- Functional MRI data were acquired in 10 normal subjects during three resting conditions: visual fixation on a crosshair, eyes open during low-level illumination, and eyes closed; these data had been used previously in a study of anticorrelated functional networks.
- Seed regions for IPS, FEF, TPJ, and VFC were defined from a meta-analysis of previous task-based attention studies, and seed-based correlation analyses were performed on preprocessed resting-state data.
- Main analyses used temporal correlation, spatial correlation, and fractional overlap, with random-effects analysis across the population and a significance threshold of P<0.01; systems were defined by conjunction across all three resting-state conditions.
Limitations
- Stated: the exact nature of spontaneous BOLD fluctuations is unknown, and unconstrained behavior/cognition during rest cannot be ruled out as a source of some spontaneous BOLD activity, although the paper argues it is unlikely to be the predominant source.
- Stated: the inferior parietal overlap region may be attributable to nonneuronal factors such as averaging, spatial resolution, or locally coherent noise, unlike the prefrontal overlap regions.
- Evident: the sample is small (10 subjects), the seed regions are derived from prior task-based studies, and the resting-state correlation design cannot establish directionality or causality between systems or link spontaneous fluctuations directly to attentional performance.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 78 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We performed this analysis and found that the intrinsically defined dorsal system, ventral system, and overlap are consistent across resting-state conditions (Fig. 11, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was a significant difference in laterality by using both the spatial correlation coefficient [F(3,27) ϭ 28.28; P Ͻ 0.0001] and the fractional overlap [F(3,27) ϭ 39.79; P Ͻ 0.0001] measures.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These systems appear to be largely segregated in their spatial topography, with only small regions of overlap in the prefrontal cortex.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The main finding in the current study is that the functional organization of the dorsal and ventral attention systems is represented in the correlation structure of spontaneous activity.”
- Also stated in: § Why Task-Related Activity Patterns Might be Reflected in Spontane- · boosted
“The current study demonstrates that the dorsal͞ ventral attention model defined on the basis of externally imposed tasks with specific attentional demands is reflected in the correlation structure of ongoing spontaneous activity.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Why Task-Related Activity Patterns Might be Reflected in Spontane- · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, we showed that spontaneous activity is more correlated between regions within the dorsal or ventral system than between systems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we constructed voxelwise maps of the dorsal and ventral systems defined solely on the basis of spontaneous activity, largely reproducing the spatial topography of the dorsal and ventral attention systems hypothesized on the basis of task-activation paradigms.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The intrinsically defined ventral attention system also is broadly consistent with the original task-based model of attention.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An important result of the present analysis is that the intrinsically defined dorsal and ventral attention systems are largely segregated in their spatial distribution.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As an alternative to the IPS͞TPJ link, regions correlated with both the dorsal and ventral attention systems were found in the right middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobe.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the intrinsic correlation between these two regions was no stronger than that between the FEF͞TPJ, IPS͞VFC, or FEF͞VFC.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 31
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identify a bilateral dorsal attention system and a right-lateralized ventral attention system solely on the basis of spontaneous activity.”
- Also stated in: § Quantitative Partitioning of Regions on the Basis of Spontaneous · boosted
“Taken together, these analyses demonstrate that the four attention regions are not equally related in their spontaneous BOLD fluctuations but rather should be partitioned into two distinct systems consisting of the IPS͞FEF and the TPJ͞VFC.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“Using this approach, we have shown that attentional regions can be partitioned into a bilateral dorsal attention system and a rightlateralized ventral attention system solely on the basis of spontaneous activity.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Quantitative Partitioning of Regions on the Basis of Spontaneous · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second observation is that correlations with the IPS and FEF are largely bilateral, whereas correlations with the TPJ and VFC are much more unilateral and largely limited to the right hemisphere.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All map pairs were not equally correlated (F(5,45) ϭ 15.54; P Ͻ 0.0001), with the IPS͞FEF and the TPJ͞VFC correlation maps being the most similar.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All region pairs were not correlated equally (F(5,45) ϭ 23.70; P Ͻ 0.0001), with the IPS͞FEF correlation and TPJ͞VFC correlation being significantly stronger than the correlation between any other region pair (P Ͻ 0.005, paired t test).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the IPS and FEF correlation maps appear similar and the TPJ and VFC correlation maps appear similar, but the IPS͞FEF correlation maps appear quite distinct from the TPJ͞VFC correlation maps.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The largest region of overlap was in the right middle frontal gyrus with additional regions in the inferior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal cortex.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These factors appear to contribute to the overlap region in the inferior parietal cortex but not the other two, suggesting that the prefrontal cortex (middle and inferior frontal gyrus) may be an important locus of functional interaction between dorsal and ventral attention systems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in contrast to the model, the intrinsically defined dorsal attention system extends beyond IPS and FEF and includes a midline supplementary motor area (SMA)͞pre-SMA region and MTϩ.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, we demonstrated that correlations in the dorsal system are bilateral, whereas those in the ventral system are lateralized to the right hemisphere.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our intrinsically defined dorsal system is consistent with the task-based model in that it includes IPS and FEF and is largely bilateral.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is largely right-lateralized and includes TPJ and VFC as well as other right frontal areas.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The ventral system is rightlateralized and composed of the right temporal-parietal junction (TPJ) and the right ventral frontal cortex (VFC).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On the basis of behavioral, neuroimaging, lesion, and electrophysiological studies, a model has been proposed that suggests that different attentional operations during sensory orienting are carried out by two separate frontoparietal systems, a dorsal attention system and a ventral attention system (for review, see ref. 4).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“On the basis of task-related imaging studies in normal human subjects, it has been suggested that two attention systems exist in the human brain: a bilateral dorsal attention system involved in top-down orienting of attention and a right-lateralized ventral attention system involved in reorienting attention in response to salient sensory stimuli.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Activity increases also are observed in the ventral system after abrupt changes in sensory stimuli (15), at the onset and offset of task blocks (16), and at the end of a completed trial (17).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is involved in voluntary (top-down) orienting and shows activity increases after presentation of cues indicating where, when, or to what subjects should direct their attention (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The dorsal system is bilateral and composed of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the junction of the precentral and superior frontal sulcus (frontal eye field, FEF) in each hemisphere.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A functional interaction between the dorsal and ventral system has been proposed such that task-relevant signals from the dorsal system ''filter'' stimulus-driven signals in the ventral system, whereas stimulus-driven ''circuit-breaking'' signals from the ventral system provide an interrupt to the dorsal system, reorienting it toward salient stimuli (4,21).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to these positive correlations, negative or anticorrelations have been noted between regions routinely modulated in opposite directions by attention demanding tasks (28,35).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This alternative perspective suggests that the brain is active even in the absence of task, primarily driven by internal dynamics, with external events modulating rather than determining the activity of the system (24)(25)(26)(27)(28).”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Correlations have been noted between regions commonly modulated together by task paradigms such as so-matomotor, visual, auditory, language, task-negative͞default, and task-positive regions including the IPS and FEF (28,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Correspondingly, the ventral system reacts more strongly to task-relevant than irrelevant distracters (20) and exhibits activity decreases when subjects search for a difficult target (6).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, coherent spontaneous activity appears to be an important source of trial-to-trial variability in measured brain responses (42,43) and may relate to the trialto-trial variability commonly observed in human behavior (44).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Third, task-evoked activity due to a specific behavior seems to be distinct from and superimposed on top of underlying spontaneous activity (40,42).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, coherent spontaneous activity appears to be an important source of trial-to-trial variability in measured brain responses (42,43) and may relate to the trialto-trial variability commonly observed in human behavior (44).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, SMA͞pre-SMA and MTϩ typically have not been considered part of the dorsal attention system for various reasons.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This extended system is consistent with previous resting-state correlation studies (28,45) and has been dubbed by us the task-positive network (28).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fact that IPS and FEF seem to share some functionality not present in the more extended network may relate to the stronger intrinsic correlation between these two regions (see Fig. 1).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although previous task-based studies have reported right lateralization of this network (4, 15, 16, 47), we directly test and quantify this laterality on the basis of spontaneous activity.”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, an inability of the ventral system to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant stimuli could cause increased distractibility, and an inability of the dorsal system to receive reorienting signals could cause an increase in perseveration.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the intrinsically defined dorsal and ventral attention systems are largely segregated in their spatial topography, the original model and task-related findings suggest that there must be some mechanism of information exchange between them.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Both distractibility and perseveration are hallmarks of prefrontal cortex damage (50).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted in the introduction, the ventral system responds more strongly to task-relevant distracters than irrelevant ones (termed contingent reorienting), and the dorsal system exhibits an activity increase in addition to the ventral system when a reorientation of attention is needed.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This information exchange has been hypothesized to occur between the right IPS and right TPJ (4).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Consistent with this finding, recent lesion studies suggest that contingent reorienting remains intact and is even enhanced after IPS damage (S.Shomstein, personal communication), suggesting that the IPS is not required for top-down information to reach the ventral attention system.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites S.Shomstein, personal communication
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, regions routinely modulated together during task conditions tend to be strongly correlated in their spontaneous activity and regions modulated in opposite directions tend to be anticorrelated (28).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the region in the parietal lobe may be due to spatial blurring, the two regions in the prefrontal cortex are not, and therefore may represent, important sites of functional interaction between the two systems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This observation is not without precedent, because the currently identified prefrontal cortex regions have been implicated in sustained attention, vigilance, and both maintaining and updating of a task set (49)(50)(51).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These possibilities are not mutually exclusive, and all may be relevant to understanding why systems defined on the basis of task-related activity patterns, such as the dorsal and ventral attention systems, can be observed in patterns of spontaneous neuronal activity in the absence of task.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fact that the dorsal and ventral systems are largely segregated may be important for the flexibility observed in the task-response patterns of these two systems, allowing them to be modulated together, independently, or in opposite directions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Coherent spontaneous fluctuations are present continuously across all brain regions.
“Finally, coherent spontaneous fluctuations are present continuously across all brain regions.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Functional pathways critical to vision, motor function, audition, language, reading, and attention are detectable as enhanced FC computed from at rest inter-region oscillatory synchronization determined via functional magnetic resonance imaging (34–42).”
From Elevated functional connectivity along a corticostriatal loop and the mechanism of auditory/verbal hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia (2011) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Self-citationAn Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553
Self-citationNeural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0135058100 · Cited by 6,358
Llinás, R. R. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3059497 · Cited by 2,285
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- D. Cordes, V. M. Haughton, K. Arfanakis, G. J. Wendt, P. A. Turski, C. H. Moritz, M. A. Quigley, M. E. Meyerand Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21, 1636–1644 (2000).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,006
Jauniaux, J., Khatibi, A., Rainville, P., & Jackson, P. L. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz055 · Cited by 154
Cognitive and default‐mode resting state networks: Do male and female brains “rest” differently?
Weissman‐Fogel, I., Moayedi, M., Taylor, K. S., Pope, G. E., & Davis, K. D. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20968 · Cited by 147
McCarthy, H., Skokauskas, N., Mulligan, A., Donohoe, G. J., Mullins, D., Kelly, J. R., Johnson, K. A., Fagan, A. J., Gill, M., Meaney, J. F., et al. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2174 · Cited by 140
Huang, Z., Obara, N., Davis, H., Pokorny, J., & Northoff, G. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.025 · Cited by 146
Characterizing Attention with Predictive Network Models
Rosenberg, M. D., Finn, E. S., Scheinost, D., Constable, R. T., & Chun, M. M. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.011 · Cited by 151
Antagonistic neural networks underlying differentiated leadership roles
Boyatzis, R. E., Rochford, K. C., & Jack, A. I. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00114 · Cited by 148
Development of the Brain’s Functional Network Architecture
Vogel, A. C., Power, J. D., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2010) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-010-9145-7 · Cited by 143
Wolf, N. D., Sambataro, F., Vasić, N., Frasch, K., Schmid, M., Schönfeldt‐Lecuona, C., Thomann, P. A., & Wolf, R. C. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.110008 · Cited by 145
Ystad, M. A., Hodneland, E., Adólfsdóttir, S., Haász, J., Lundervold, A. J., Eichele, T., & Lundervold, A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.016 · Cited by 147
Overall brain connectivity maps show cortico‐subcortical abnormalities in schizophrenia
Salvador, R. M., Sarró, S., Gomar, J. J., Ortiz‐Gil, J., Vila‐Rodriguez, F., Capdevila, A., Bullmore, E. T., McKenna, P. J., & Pomarol‐Clotet, E. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20993 · Cited by 143
Markett, S. A., Reuter, M., Montag, C., Voigt, G., Lachmann, B., Rudorf, S., Elger, C. E., & Weber, B. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22285 · Cited by 147
Resting bold fMRI differentiates dementia with Lewy bodies vs Alzheimer disease
Galvin, J. E., Price, J. L., Yan, Z., Morris, J. C., & Sheline, Y. I. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821ccc83 · Cited by 137
The State of Resting State Networks
Seitzman, B. A., Snyder, A. Z., Leuthardt, E. C., & Shimony, J. S. (2019) · Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1097/rmr.0000000000000214 · Cited by 153
Self-citationModulation of the brain’s functional network architecture in the transition from wake to sleep
Larson‐Prior, L. J., Power, J. D., Vincent, J. L., Nolan, T. S., Coalson, R. S., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (2011) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53839-0.00018-1 · Cited by 145
Self-citationResting-State Connectivity Predictors of Response to Psychotherapy in Major Depressive Disorder
Crowther, A., Smoski, M. J., Minkel, J. D., Moore, T. M., Gibbs, D. E., Petty, C., Bizzell, J., Schiller, C. E., Sideris, J. H., Carl, H., et al. (2015) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.12 · Cited by 139
Attention‐related networks in Alzheimer's disease: A resting functional MRI study
Li, R., Wu, X., Fleisher, A., Reiman, E. M., Chen, K., & Li, Y. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21269 · Cited by 146
The VWFA: it's not just for words anymore
Vogel, A. C., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00088 · Cited by 133
Abnormal brain synchrony in Down Syndrome
Anderson, J. S., Nielsen, J. A., Ferguson, M. A., Burback, M., Cox, E., Dai, L., Gerig, G., Edgin, J. O., & Korenberg, J. R. (2013) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.05.006 · Cited by 148
Kucyi, A., Schrouff, J., Bickel, S., Foster, B. L., Shine, J. M., & Parvizi, J. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0217-18.2018 · Cited by 134
The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822 · Cited by 148
Stress Impact on Resting State Brain Networks
Soares, J. M., Sampaio, A., Ferreira, L. M., Santos, N. C., Marques, P., Marques, F., Palha, J. A., Cerqueira, J., & Sousa, N. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066500 · Cited by 137
Mitchell, T. J., Hacker, C. D., Breshears, J. D., Szrama, N. P., Sharma, M., Bundy, D. T., Pahwa, M., Corbetta, M., Snyder, A. Z., Shimony, J. S., et al. (2013) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000000141 · Cited by 141
Self-citationShine, J. M., Halliday, G. M., Gilat, M., Matar, E., Bolitho, S., Carlos, M., Naismith, S. L., & Lewis, S. J. G. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22321 · Cited by 133
Disrupted Functional Brain Connectivity in Partial Epilepsy: A Resting-State fMRI Study
Luo, C., Qiu, C., Guo, Z., Fang, J., Li, Q., Lei, X., Xia, Y., Lai, Y., Gong, Q., Zhou, D., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028196 · Cited by 134
Altered resting state attentional networks in diabetic neuropathic pain
Cauda, F., D’Agata, F., Sacco, K., Duca, S., Cocito, D., Paolasso, I., Isoardo, G., & Geminiani, G. C. (2009) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.188631 · Cited by 134
Alderson‐Day, B., Diederen, K. M. J., Fernyhough, C., Ford, J. M., Horga, G., Margulies, D. S., McCarthy‐Jones, S., Northoff, G., Shine, J. M., Turner, J. A., et al. (2016) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw078 · Cited by 132
Changes in Brain Network Efficiency and Working Memory Performance in Aging
Stanley, M. L., Simpson, S. L., Dagenbach, D., Lyday, R. G., Burdette, J. H., & Laurienti, P. J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123950 · Cited by 137
Task-free presurgical mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging intrinsic activity
Liu, H., Buckner, R. L., Talukdar, T., Tanaka, N., Madsen, J. R., & Stufflebeam, S. M. (2009) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2008.10.jns08846 · Cited by 129
Divergent task-dependent functional connectivity of executive control and salience networks
Elton, A., & Gao, W. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.10.012 · Cited by 127
Brain Network Adaptability across Task States
Davison, E. N., Schlesinger, K. J., Bassett, D. S., Lynall, M.-E., Miller, M. B., Grafton, S. T., & Carlson, J. M. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004029 · Cited by 129
Esposito, R., Cieri, F., Chiacchiaretta, P., Cera, N., Lauriola, M., Giannantonio, M. D., Tartaro, A., & Ferretti, A. (2017) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-017-9686-y · Cited by 133
Dysconnectivity of Large-Scale Functional Networks in Early Psychosis: A Meta-analysis
O’Neill, A., Mechelli, A., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2018) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby094 · Cited by 127
Resting-State Neural Activity across Face-Selective Cortical Regions Is Behaviorally Relevant
Zhu, Q., Zhang, J., Luo, Y., Dilks, D. D., & Liu, J. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0873-11.2011 · Cited by 136
Wu, J., Wu, H.-Z., Yan, C., Chen, W., Zhang, H., Yong He, A., & Yang, H. (2011) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.08.059 · Cited by 126
Intrinsic functional connectivity of periaqueductal gray subregions in humans
Coulombe, M., Erpelding, N., Kucyi, A., & Davis, K. D. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23117 · Cited by 130
Neural networks of tinnitus in humans: Elucidating severity and habituation
Husain, F. T. (2015) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.010 · Cited by 128
Total activation: fMRI deconvolution through spatio-temporal regularization
Karahanoğlu, F. I., Caballero‐Gaudes, C., Lazeyras, F., & Ville, D. V. D. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.067 · Cited by 126
Brain Connectivity and Visual Attention
Parks, E. L., & Madden, D. J. (2013) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0139 · Cited by 138
The role of impaired neuronal communication in neurological disorders
He, B. J., Shulman, G. L., Snyder, A. Z., & Corbetta, M. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e3282f1c720 · Cited by 126
Self-citationTartaglia, M. C., Rosen, H. J., & Miller, B. L. (2011) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-010-0012-2 · Cited by 124
Peraza, L. R., Kaiser, M., Firbank, M., Graziadio, S., Bonanni, L., ONOFRJ, M. C., Colloby, S. J., Blamire, A. M., O'Brien, J. T., & Taylor, J. (2014) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.03.013 · Cited by 123
Implicit guidance of attention: The priority state space framework
Todd, R. M., & Manaligod, M. G. M. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.001 · Cited by 130
Electrophysiological dynamics of antagonistic brain networks reflect attentional fluctuations
Kucyi, A., Daitch, A. L., Raccah, O., Zhao, B., Zhang, C., Esterman, M. S., Zeineh, M., Halpern, C. H., Zhang, K., Zhang, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14166-2 · Cited by 128
Liu, F., Xie, B., Wang, Y., Guo, W., Fouché, J., Long, Z., Wang, W., Chen, H., Li, M., Duan, X., et al. (2014) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-014-0386-2 · Cited by 126
Turnbull, A. G., Wang, H.-T., Schooler, J. W., Jefferies, E., Margulies, D. S., & Smallwood, J. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.069 · Cited by 131
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Matthews, M., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2013) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45758-0_249 · Cited by 124
Barber, A. D., Caffo, B. S., Pekar, J. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.011 · Cited by 123
Are Anticorrelated Networks in the Brain Relevant to Schizophrenia?
Williamson, P. (2007) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm043 · Cited by 125
Vink, J. J. T., Mandija, S., Petrov, P. I., van den Berg, C. A. T., Sommer, I. E., & Neggers, S. F. W. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24307 · Cited by 122
EEG Microstate Analysis in Drug-Naive Patients with Panic Disorder
Kikuchi, M., Koenig, T. W., Munesue, T., Hanaoka, A., Strik, W. K., Dierks, T., Koshino, Y., & Minabe, Y. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022912 · Cited by 125
Do I feel or do I know? Neuroimaging meta-analyses on the multiple facets of empathy
Kogler, L., Müller, V. I., Werminghausen, E., Eickhoff, S. B., & Derntl, B. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.031 · Cited by 134
Music and Language Syntax Interact in Broca’s Area: An fMRI Study
Kunert, R., Willems, R. M., Casasanto, D. J., Patel, A. D., & Peter Hagoort, A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141069 · Cited by 138
A brain-based pain facilitation mechanism contributes to painful diabetic polyneuropathy
Segerdahl, A. R., Themistocleous, A. C., Fido, D., Bennett, D., & Tracey, I. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx337 · Cited by 126
Attractors and noise: Twin drivers of decisions and multistability
Braun, J., & Mattia, M. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.126 · Cited by 124
Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contingent negative variation period
Gómez, C. M., Flores, A., & Ledesma, A. (2007) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.015 · Cited by 118
Müller, N., & Weisz, N. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr232 · Cited by 122
Anterior insula regulates brain network transitions that gate conscious access
Huang, Z., Tarnal, V., Vlisides, P. E., Janke, E., McKinney, A., Picton, P., Mashour, G. A., & Hudetz, A. G. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109081 · Cited by 122
Hlinka, J., Alexakis, C., Diukova, A., Liddle, P. F., & Auer, D. P. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.002 · Cited by 116
Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention From brain mechanisms to individual differences in efficiency
Rueda, M. R., Pozuelos, J. P., & Cómbita, L. M. (2015) · AIMS neuroscience · doi:10.3934/neuroscience.2015.4.183 · Cited by 134
Marzetti, L., Penna, S. D., Snyder, A. Z., Pizzella, V., Nolte, G., de Pasquale, F., Romani, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.062 · Cited by 119
Self-citationDecoding lifespan changes of the human brain using resting-state functional connectivity MRI
Wang, L., Su, L., Shen, H., & Hu, D. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044530 · Cited by 115
Shen, W., Tu, Y., Gollub, R. L., Ortiz, A., Napadow, V., Yu, S., Wilson, G., Park, J., Lang, C., Jung, M., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101775 · Cited by 139
Neural correlates of personal space intrusion
Holt, D. J., Cassidy, B. S., Yue, X., Rauch, S. L., Boeke, E. A., Nasr, S., Tootell, R. B. H., & Coombs, G. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0686-13.2014 · Cited by 114
Tekok-Kılıç, A., Benedict, R. H. B., Weinstock‐Guttman, B., Dwyer, M. G., Carone, D. A., Srinivasaraghavan, B., Yella, V., Abdelrahman, N. G., Munschauer, F. E., Bakshi, R., et al. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.017 · Cited by 114
Interplay between functional connectivity and scale-free dynamics in intrinsic fMRI networks
Ciuciu, P., Abry, P., & He, B. J. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.047 · Cited by 118
Using coherence to measure regional homogeneity of resting-state fMRI signal
Liu, D. (2010) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00024 · Cited by 114
Default mode network subsystem alterations in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Beucke, J. C., Sepulcre, J., Eldaief, M. C., Sebold, M., Kathmann, N., & Kaufmann, C. (2014) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.137380 · Cited by 119
Walz, J. M., Goldman, R. I., Carapezza, M., Muraskin, J., Brown, T. R., & Sajda, P. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2649-13.2013 · Cited by 114
Cortical Signatures of Dyslexia and Remediation: An Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Approach
Koyama, M. S., Martino, A. D., Kelly, C. A. M., Jutagir, D. R., Sunshine, J. M., Schwartz, S. J., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055454 · Cited by 111
Topography and behavioral relevance of the global signal in the human brain
Li, J., Bolt, T., Bzdok, D., Nomi, J. S., Yeo, B. T. T., Spreng, R. N., & Uddin, L. Q. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50750-8 · Cited by 101
Brain networks for visual creativity: a functional connectivity study of planning a visual artwork
Pisapia, N. D., Bacci, F., Parrott, D., & Melcher, D. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39185 · Cited by 117
Anatomy and White Matter Connections of the Middle Frontal Gyrus
Briggs, R. G., Lin, Y., Dadario, N. B., Kim, S. J., Young, I. M., Bai, M. Y., Dhanaraj, V., Fonseka, R. D., Hormovas, J., Tanglay, O., et al. (2021) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.045 · Cited by 112
Kang, J., Wang, L., Yan, C., Wang, J., Liang, X., & He, Y. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.033 · Cited by 111
Davey, C. G., Whittle, S., Harrison, B. J., Simmons, J. G., Byrne, M. L., Schwartz, O., & Allen, N. B. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714002001 · Cited by 112
Chou, Y., Panych, L. P., Dickey, C. C., Petrella, J. R., & Chen, N. (2012) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a2894 · Cited by 113
van Balkom, T. D., van den Heuvel, O. A., Berendse, H. W., van der Werf, Y. D., & Vriend, C. (2020) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-020-09440-w · Cited by 122
Chen, G., Chen, G., Xie, C., & Li, S.-J. (2011) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0025 · Cited by 115
Reward, salience, and attentional networks are activated by religious experience in devout Mormons
Ferguson, M. A., Nielsen, J. A., King, J. B., Dai, L., Giangrasso, D. M., Holman, R., Korenberg, J. R., & Anderson, J. S. (2016) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2016.1257437 · Cited by 118
An emergent functional parcellation of the temporal cortex
Jackson, R. L., Bajada, C. J., Rice, G. E., Cloutman, L. L., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.024 · Cited by 111
Altered resting state networks in epileptic patients with generalized tonic–clonic seizures
Wang, Z., Lu, G., Zhang, Z., Zhong, Y., Jiao, Q., Zhang, Z., Tan, Q., Tian, L., Chen, G., Liao, W., et al. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.034 · Cited by 110
Petridou, N., Caballero‐Gaudes, C., Dryden, I. L., Francis, S., & Gowland, P. A. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21513 · Cited by 109
Franciotti, R., Falasca, N. W., Bonanni, L., Anzellotti, F., Maruotti, V., Comani, S., Thomas, A., Tartaro, A., Taylor, J., & ONOFRJ, M. C. (2012) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.09.015 · Cited by 108
White matter tracts and executive functions: a review of causal and correlation evidence
Ribeiro, M., Yordanova, Y. N., Noblet, V., Herbet, G., & Ricard, D. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad308 · Cited by 125
Functional connectomics in depression: insights into therapies
Chai, Y., Sheline, Y. I., Oathes, D. J., Balderston, N. L., Rao, H., & Yu, M. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.05.006 · Cited by 112
Integrated local correlation: A new measure of local coherence in fMRI data
Deshpande, G., LaConte, S. M., Peltier, S., & Hu, X. P. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20482 · Cited by 108
Rayhan, R. U., Stevens, B. W., Timbol, C. R., Adewuyi, O., Walitt, B. T., VanMeter, J. W., & Baraniuk, J. N. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058493 · Cited by 107
Krieger-Redwood, K., Jefferies, E., Karapanagiotidis, T., Seymour, R., Nunes, A., Ang, J. W. A., Majernikova, V., Mollo, G., & Smallwood, J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.060 · Cited by 106
Jakobs, O., Langner, R., Caspers, S., Roski, C., Cieslik, E. C., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.037 · Cited by 105
Siddiqi, S. H., Trapp, N. T., Hacker, C. D., Laumann, T. O., Kandala, S., Hong, X., Trillo, L., Shahim, P., Leuthardt, E. C., Carter, A. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2018.5889 · Cited by 106
Zhang, B., Jung, M., Tu, Y., Gollub, R. L., Lang, C., Ortiz, A., Park, J., Wilson, G., Gerber, J. A., Mawla, I., et al. (2019) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.021 · Cited by 106
Shafer, A. T., Matveychuk, D., Penney, T., O’Hare, A. J., Stokes, J. D., & Dolcos, F. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00206 · Cited by 116
Hemodynamic Correlates of Cognition in Human Infants
Aslin, R. Ν., Shukla, M., & Emberson, L. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115108 · Cited by 103
Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain
Yang, Z., Zuo, X., McMahon, K. L., Craddock, R. C., Kelly, C. A. M., de Zubicaray, G. I., Hickie, I. B., Bandettini, P. A., Castellanos, F. X., Milham, M. P., et al. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw027 · Cited by 106
The goal priority network as a neural substrate of Conscientiousness
Rueter, A., Abram, S. V., MacDonald, A. W., Rustichini, A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24195 · Cited by 108
Atypical developmental of dorsal and ventral attention networks in autism
Farrant, K., & Uddin, L. Q. (2015) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12359 · Cited by 101
The spatial chronnectome reveals a dynamic interplay between functional segregation and integration
Iraji, A., DeRamus, T. P., Lewis, N., Yaesoubi, M., Stephen, J. M., Erhardt, E. B., Belger, A., Ford, J. M., McEwen, S. C., Mathalon, D. H., et al. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24580 · Cited by 107
Intrinsically organized resting state networks in the human spinal cord
Kong, Y., Eippert, F., Beckmann, C. F., Andersson, J., Finsterbusch, J., Büchel, C., Tracey, I., & Brooks, J. C. W. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414293111 · Cited by 104
Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Lang, S., Duncan, N. W., & Northoff, G. (2014) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000000307 · Cited by 103
Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., Luus, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2007) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2007.05.004 · Cited by 109
James, G. A., Lu, Z., VanMeter, J. W., Sathian, K., Hu, X. P., & Butler, A. J. (2009) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/tsr1604-270 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, M. D., Corbetta, M., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., & Raichle, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-06-27
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 10046-10051
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2045758998
- Semantic Scholar
- b38a6ee957f3ce59a88e21d93d8f3e82d6da7909
- Cited by
- 2,101
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 190 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 129 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 116
- FWCI
- 24.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2006-09-05)
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5f30ns054398-02, NS06833)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 7192-06, R01MH071920)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F30 NS 054398-01, F30 NS-054398, NS 048013, R01NS048013, P50NS006833, NS 06833)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- spontaneous neuronal activity, resting-state brain activity, top-down attention, prefrontal cortex, functional connectivity, hemispheric lateralization, attentional control
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurons, Oxygen, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
