The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 78 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems
Open accessAbstract
On the basis of task-related imaging studies in normal human subjects, it has been suggested that two attention systems exist in the human brain: a bilateral dorsal attention system involved in top-down orienting of attention and a right-lateralized ventral attention system involved in reorienting attention in response to salient sensory stimuli. An important question is whether this functional organization emerges only in response to external attentional demands or is represented more fundamentally in the internal dynamics of brain activity. To address this question, we examine correlations in spontaneous fluctuations of the functional MRI blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the absence of task, stimuli, or explicit attentional demands. We identify a bilateral dorsal attention system and a right-lateralized ventral attention system solely on the basis of spontaneous activity. Further, we observe regions in the prefrontal cortex correlated with both systems, a potential mechanism for mediating the functional interaction between systems. These findings demonstrate that the neuroanatomical substrates of human attention persist in the absence of external events, reflected in the correlation structure of spontaneous activity.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Spontaneous BOLD fluctuations in resting-state fMRI are sufficient to recover the dorsal and ventral human attention systems, with the dorsal system bilateral and the ventral system right-lateralized. The two systems are largely segregated, with prefrontal overlap suggesting a possible interaction site.
Key findings
- Four attention seed regions—IPS and FEF (dorsal), TPJ and VFC (ventral)—partition into two systems on the basis of spontaneous activity: IPS/FEF and TPJ/VFC correlations were significantly stronger than any other region pair (all region pairs not equally correlated, F(5,45)=23.70, P<0.0001; pairwise P<0.005).
- Correlation-map similarity and overlap also separated the systems: spatial correlation across maps differed significantly (F(5,45)=15.54, P<0.0001), as did fractional overlap (F(5,45)=17.04, P<0.0001), with IPS/FEF and TPJ/VFC pairs most similar/overlapping.
- Dorsal maps were bilateral, whereas ventral maps were right-lateralized: laterality differed by spatial correlation (F(3,27)=28.28, P<0.0001) and fractional overlap (F(3,27)=39.79, P<0.0001); IPS/FEF maps were significantly more bilateral than VFC/TPJ maps (spatial correlation P<0.05; overlap P<0.006).
- Intrinsically defined dorsal and ventral systems were largely segregated; overlap regions were found in right middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal cortex, with the prefrontal regions suggested as possible interaction sites after controlling for nonneuronal factors.
Methods
- Functional MRI data were acquired in 10 normal subjects during three resting conditions: visual fixation on a crosshair, eyes open during low-level illumination, and eyes closed; these data had been used previously in a study of anticorrelated functional networks.
- Seed regions for IPS, FEF, TPJ, and VFC were defined from a meta-analysis of previous task-based attention studies, and seed-based correlation analyses were performed on preprocessed resting-state data.
- Main analyses used temporal correlation, spatial correlation, and fractional overlap, with random-effects analysis across the population and a significance threshold of P<0.01; systems were defined by conjunction across all three resting-state conditions.
Limitations
- Stated: the exact nature of spontaneous BOLD fluctuations is unknown, and unconstrained behavior/cognition during rest cannot be ruled out as a source of some spontaneous BOLD activity, although the paper argues it is unlikely to be the predominant source.
- Stated: the inferior parietal overlap region may be attributable to nonneuronal factors such as averaging, spatial resolution, or locally coherent noise, unlike the prefrontal overlap regions.
- Evident: the sample is small (10 subjects), the seed regions are derived from prior task-based studies, and the resting-state correlation design cannot establish directionality or causality between systems or link spontaneous fluctuations directly to attentional performance.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 78 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We performed this analysis and found that the intrinsically defined dorsal system, ventral system, and overlap are consistent across resting-state conditions (Fig. 11, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was a significant difference in laterality by using both the spatial correlation coefficient [F(3,27) ϭ 28.28; P Ͻ 0.0001] and the fractional overlap [F(3,27) ϭ 39.79; P Ͻ 0.0001] measures.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These systems appear to be largely segregated in their spatial topography, with only small regions of overlap in the prefrontal cortex.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The main finding in the current study is that the functional organization of the dorsal and ventral attention systems is represented in the correlation structure of spontaneous activity.”
- Also stated in: § Why Task-Related Activity Patterns Might be Reflected in Spontane- · boosted
“The current study demonstrates that the dorsal͞ ventral attention model defined on the basis of externally imposed tasks with specific attentional demands is reflected in the correlation structure of ongoing spontaneous activity.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Why Task-Related Activity Patterns Might be Reflected in Spontane- · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, we showed that spontaneous activity is more correlated between regions within the dorsal or ventral system than between systems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we constructed voxelwise maps of the dorsal and ventral systems defined solely on the basis of spontaneous activity, largely reproducing the spatial topography of the dorsal and ventral attention systems hypothesized on the basis of task-activation paradigms.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The intrinsically defined ventral attention system also is broadly consistent with the original task-based model of attention.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An important result of the present analysis is that the intrinsically defined dorsal and ventral attention systems are largely segregated in their spatial distribution.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As an alternative to the IPS͞TPJ link, regions correlated with both the dorsal and ventral attention systems were found in the right middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobe.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the intrinsic correlation between these two regions was no stronger than that between the FEF͞TPJ, IPS͞VFC, or FEF͞VFC.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 31
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identify a bilateral dorsal attention system and a right-lateralized ventral attention system solely on the basis of spontaneous activity.”
- Also stated in: § Quantitative Partitioning of Regions on the Basis of Spontaneous · boosted
“Taken together, these analyses demonstrate that the four attention regions are not equally related in their spontaneous BOLD fluctuations but rather should be partitioned into two distinct systems consisting of the IPS͞FEF and the TPJ͞VFC.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“Using this approach, we have shown that attentional regions can be partitioned into a bilateral dorsal attention system and a rightlateralized ventral attention system solely on the basis of spontaneous activity.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Quantitative Partitioning of Regions on the Basis of Spontaneous · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second observation is that correlations with the IPS and FEF are largely bilateral, whereas correlations with the TPJ and VFC are much more unilateral and largely limited to the right hemisphere.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All map pairs were not equally correlated (F(5,45) ϭ 15.54; P Ͻ 0.0001), with the IPS͞FEF and the TPJ͞VFC correlation maps being the most similar.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All region pairs were not correlated equally (F(5,45) ϭ 23.70; P Ͻ 0.0001), with the IPS͞FEF correlation and TPJ͞VFC correlation being significantly stronger than the correlation between any other region pair (P Ͻ 0.005, paired t test).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the IPS and FEF correlation maps appear similar and the TPJ and VFC correlation maps appear similar, but the IPS͞FEF correlation maps appear quite distinct from the TPJ͞VFC correlation maps.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The largest region of overlap was in the right middle frontal gyrus with additional regions in the inferior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal cortex.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These factors appear to contribute to the overlap region in the inferior parietal cortex but not the other two, suggesting that the prefrontal cortex (middle and inferior frontal gyrus) may be an important locus of functional interaction between dorsal and ventral attention systems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in contrast to the model, the intrinsically defined dorsal attention system extends beyond IPS and FEF and includes a midline supplementary motor area (SMA)͞pre-SMA region and MTϩ.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, we demonstrated that correlations in the dorsal system are bilateral, whereas those in the ventral system are lateralized to the right hemisphere.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our intrinsically defined dorsal system is consistent with the task-based model in that it includes IPS and FEF and is largely bilateral.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is largely right-lateralized and includes TPJ and VFC as well as other right frontal areas.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The ventral system is rightlateralized and composed of the right temporal-parietal junction (TPJ) and the right ventral frontal cortex (VFC).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On the basis of behavioral, neuroimaging, lesion, and electrophysiological studies, a model has been proposed that suggests that different attentional operations during sensory orienting are carried out by two separate frontoparietal systems, a dorsal attention system and a ventral attention system (for review, see ref. 4).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“On the basis of task-related imaging studies in normal human subjects, it has been suggested that two attention systems exist in the human brain: a bilateral dorsal attention system involved in top-down orienting of attention and a right-lateralized ventral attention system involved in reorienting attention in response to salient sensory stimuli.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Activity increases also are observed in the ventral system after abrupt changes in sensory stimuli (15), at the onset and offset of task blocks (16), and at the end of a completed trial (17).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is involved in voluntary (top-down) orienting and shows activity increases after presentation of cues indicating where, when, or to what subjects should direct their attention (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The dorsal system is bilateral and composed of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the junction of the precentral and superior frontal sulcus (frontal eye field, FEF) in each hemisphere.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A functional interaction between the dorsal and ventral system has been proposed such that task-relevant signals from the dorsal system ''filter'' stimulus-driven signals in the ventral system, whereas stimulus-driven ''circuit-breaking'' signals from the ventral system provide an interrupt to the dorsal system, reorienting it toward salient stimuli (4,21).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to these positive correlations, negative or anticorrelations have been noted between regions routinely modulated in opposite directions by attention demanding tasks (28,35).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This alternative perspective suggests that the brain is active even in the absence of task, primarily driven by internal dynamics, with external events modulating rather than determining the activity of the system (24)(25)(26)(27)(28).”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Correlations have been noted between regions commonly modulated together by task paradigms such as so-matomotor, visual, auditory, language, task-negative͞default, and task-positive regions including the IPS and FEF (28,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Correspondingly, the ventral system reacts more strongly to task-relevant than irrelevant distracters (20) and exhibits activity decreases when subjects search for a difficult target (6).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, coherent spontaneous activity appears to be an important source of trial-to-trial variability in measured brain responses (42,43) and may relate to the trialto-trial variability commonly observed in human behavior (44).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Third, task-evoked activity due to a specific behavior seems to be distinct from and superimposed on top of underlying spontaneous activity (40,42).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, coherent spontaneous activity appears to be an important source of trial-to-trial variability in measured brain responses (42,43) and may relate to the trialto-trial variability commonly observed in human behavior (44).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, SMA͞pre-SMA and MTϩ typically have not been considered part of the dorsal attention system for various reasons.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This extended system is consistent with previous resting-state correlation studies (28,45) and has been dubbed by us the task-positive network (28).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fact that IPS and FEF seem to share some functionality not present in the more extended network may relate to the stronger intrinsic correlation between these two regions (see Fig. 1).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although previous task-based studies have reported right lateralization of this network (4, 15, 16, 47), we directly test and quantify this laterality on the basis of spontaneous activity.”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, an inability of the ventral system to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant stimuli could cause increased distractibility, and an inability of the dorsal system to receive reorienting signals could cause an increase in perseveration.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the intrinsically defined dorsal and ventral attention systems are largely segregated in their spatial topography, the original model and task-related findings suggest that there must be some mechanism of information exchange between them.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Both distractibility and perseveration are hallmarks of prefrontal cortex damage (50).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted in the introduction, the ventral system responds more strongly to task-relevant distracters than irrelevant ones (termed contingent reorienting), and the dorsal system exhibits an activity increase in addition to the ventral system when a reorientation of attention is needed.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This information exchange has been hypothesized to occur between the right IPS and right TPJ (4).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Consistent with this finding, recent lesion studies suggest that contingent reorienting remains intact and is even enhanced after IPS damage (S.Shomstein, personal communication), suggesting that the IPS is not required for top-down information to reach the ventral attention system.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites S.Shomstein, personal communication
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, regions routinely modulated together during task conditions tend to be strongly correlated in their spontaneous activity and regions modulated in opposite directions tend to be anticorrelated (28).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the region in the parietal lobe may be due to spatial blurring, the two regions in the prefrontal cortex are not, and therefore may represent, important sites of functional interaction between the two systems.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This observation is not without precedent, because the currently identified prefrontal cortex regions have been implicated in sustained attention, vigilance, and both maintaining and updating of a task set (49)(50)(51).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These possibilities are not mutually exclusive, and all may be relevant to understanding why systems defined on the basis of task-related activity patterns, such as the dorsal and ventral attention systems, can be observed in patterns of spontaneous neuronal activity in the absence of task.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fact that the dorsal and ventral systems are largely segregated may be important for the flexibility observed in the task-response patterns of these two systems, allowing them to be modulated together, independently, or in opposite directions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Coherent spontaneous fluctuations are present continuously across all brain regions.
“Finally, coherent spontaneous fluctuations are present continuously across all brain regions.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Functional pathways critical to vision, motor function, audition, language, reading, and attention are detectable as enhanced FC computed from at rest inter-region oscillatory synchronization determined via functional magnetic resonance imaging (34–42).”
From Elevated functional connectivity along a corticostriatal loop and the mechanism of auditory/verbal hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia (2011) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Self-citationAn Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553
Self-citationNeural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0135058100 · Cited by 6,358
Llinás, R. R. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3059497 · Cited by 2,285
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- D. Cordes, V. M. Haughton, K. Arfanakis, G. J. Wendt, P. A. Turski, C. H. Moritz, M. A. Quigley, M. E. Meyerand Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21, 1636–1644 (2000).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,006
Tsai, C., Pan, C., Cherng, R., Hsu, Y.-W., & Chiu, H.-H. (2009) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.006 · Cited by 65
The Neuronal Replicator Hypothesis
Fernando, C., Goldstein, R. A., & Szathmáry, E. (2010) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00031 · Cited by 59
Widjaja, E., Zamyadi, M., Raybaud, C., Snead, O. C., & Smith, M. L. (2013) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a3608 · Cited by 65
Heightened central affective response to visceral sensations of pain and discomfort in IBS
Hall, G. B., Kamath, M. V., Collins, S. M., Ganguli, S. C., Spaziani, R., miranda, K. L., Bayati, A. I., & Bienenstock, J. (2010) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01436.x · Cited by 63
Arviv, O., Goldstein, A., & Shriki, O. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0477-15.2015 · Cited by 60
Wu, T., Mishra, A., Wang, F., Yang, P., Gore, J. C., & Chen, L. M. (2016) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.591 · Cited by 62
Hsiao, F., Tsai, P.-J., Wu, C. W., Yang, C., Lane, T. J., Lee, H., Chen, L.-C., Lee, W.-K., Lu, L.-H., & Wu, Y. (2018) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy056 · Cited by 61
Pinsk, M. A., & Kästner, S. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/447046a · Cited by 62
Blautzik, J., Keeser, D., Berman, A., Paolini, M., Kirsch, V., Mueller, S., Coates, U., Reiser, M. F., Teipel, S. J., & Meindl, T. (2013) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-111970 · Cited by 64
Representation learning of resting state fMRI with variational autoencoder
Kim, J., Zhang, Y., Han, K., Wen, Z., Choi, M., & Liu, Z. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118423 · Cited by 66
Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Lau, W. K., Wei, X., Liu, Y., Huang, R., & Zhang, R. (2022) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-022-00628-7 · Cited by 62
Knowing left from right: asymmetric functional connectivity during resting state
Raemaekers, M. A. H., Schellekens, W., Petridou, N., & Ramsey, N. F. (2018) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-017-1604-y · Cited by 61
Cognitive slowing and its underlying neurobiology in temporal lobe epilepsy
Hwang, G., Dabbs, K., Conant, L. L., Nair, V. A., Mathis, J., Almane, D. N., Nencka, A. S., Birn, R. M., Humphries, C., Raghavan, M., et al. (2019) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.022 · Cited by 62
Physical presence of spouse enhances brain-to-brain synchrony in co-parenting couples
Azhari, A., Lim, M., Bizzego, A., Gabrieli, G., Bornstein, M. H., & Esposito, G. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63596-2 · Cited by 65
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Matthews, M., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2013) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2013_249 · Cited by 80
Functional Involvement of Human Periaqueductal Gray and Other Midbrain Nuclei in Cognitive Control
Kragel, P. A., Bianciardi, M., Hartley, L., Matthewson, G., Choi, J., Quigley, K. S., Wald, L. L., Wager, T. D., Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2043-18.2019 · Cited by 61
Li, Y., Yang, C., Zhang, W., Li, S., Li, Q., Chen, L., Lui, S., Kemp, G. J., Biswal, B. B., Shah, N. J., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2021.100915 · Cited by 61
Spatial and temporal functional connectivity changes between resting and attentive states
Bray, S., Arnold, A. E. G. F., Levy, R., & Iaria, G. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22646 · Cited by 60
Altered resting state functional network connectivity in children absence epilepsy
Li, Q., Cao, W., Liao, X., Chen, Z., Yang, T., Gong, Q., Zhou, D., Luo, C., & Yao, D. (2015) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2015.04.054 · Cited by 63
Church, J. A., Balota, D. A., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21515 · Cited by 60
Sourty, M., Thoraval, L., Roquet, D., Armspach, J., Foucher, J., & Blanc, F. (2016) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2016.00060 · Cited by 64
Functional connectivity between prefrontal and parietal cortex drives visuo-spatial attention shifts
Heinen, K., Feredoes, E. A., Ruff, C. C., & Driver, J. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.024 · Cited by 58
Self-regulation and control in personality functioning
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511596544.027 · Cited by 59
Neuropharmacological modulation of the aberrant bodily self through psychedelics
Ho, J. T., Preller, K. H., & Lenggenhager, B. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.006 · Cited by 62
Fitzgerald, J., Johnson, K. A., Kehoe, E. G., Bokde, A. L. W., Garavan, H., Gallagher, L., & McGrath, J. (2014) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1430 · Cited by 64
Pathological uncoupling between amplitude and connectivity of brain fluctuations in epilepsy
Zhang, Z., Xu, Q., Liao, W., Wang, Z., Li, Q., Yang, F., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., & Lu, G. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22805 · Cited by 59
Images-based suppression of unwanted global signals in resting-state functional connectivity studies
Giove, F., Gili, T., Iacovella, V., Macaluso, E., & Maraviglia, B. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2009.06.004 · Cited by 57
Interregional Brain Interactions in Children with Unilateral Hearing Loss
Tibbetts, K. M., Ead, B., Umansky, A. M., Coalson, R. S., Schlaggar, B. L., Firszt, J. B., & Lieu, J. E. C. (2011) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599810394954 · Cited by 59
Sun, H. J., Luo, L., Yuan, X., Zhang, L., He, Y., Yao, S., Wang, J., & Xiao, J. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.061 · Cited by 59
Concurrent TMS-fMRI reveals interactions between dorsal and ventral attentional systems
Leitao, J., Thielscher, A., Tunnerhoff, J., & Noppeney, U. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0939-15.2015 · Cited by 58
Brain functional abnormalities in the amygdala subregions is associated with anxious depression
Qiao, J., Tao, S., Wang, X., Shi, J., Chen, Y., Tian, S., Yao, Z., & Lü, Q. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.077 · Cited by 58
Vega, J. N., Hohman, T. J., Pryweller, J. R., Dykens, E. M., & Thornton‐Wells, T. A. (2015) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2014.0266 · Cited by 63
Li, R., Chen, K., Fleisher, A., Reiman, E. M., Yao, L., & Wu, X. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.010 · Cited by 62
Functional connectivity and oscillatory neuronal activity in the resting human brain
Ganzetti, M., & Mantini, D. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.02.032 · Cited by 61
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Bai, L., Yan, H. J., Dai, R., Zhong, C., Wang, H., Wei, W., Xue, T., Feng, Y., et al. (2012) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.2803 · Cited by 58
Present Status of the Postural Origins Theory
MacNeilage, P. F. (2007) · Special topics in primatology · doi:10.1016/s1936-8526(07)05003-8 · Cited by 57
Dissociating anticipation from perception: Acute pain activates default mode network
Minassian, A. T., Ricalens, E., Humbert, S., Duc, F., Aubé, C., & Beydon, L. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22062 · Cited by 62
Neural mechanisms for learning actions in context
Luu, P., Tucker, D. M., & Stripling, R. M. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.092 · Cited by 56
Decoding covert spatial attention using electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals in humans
Gunduz, A., Brunner, P., Daitch, A. L., Leuthardt, E. C., Ritaccio, A. L., Pesaran, B., & Schalk, G. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.017 · Cited by 56
Aberrant Functional Organization within and between Resting-State Networks in AD
Song, J., Qin, W., Liu, Y., Duan, Y., Liu, J., He, X., Li, K., Zhang, X., Jiang, T., & Yu, C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063727 · Cited by 60
Functional Connectivity Networks in Nonbothersome Tinnitus
Wineland, A., Burton, H., & Piccirillo, J. F. (2012) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599812451414 · Cited by 57
The canonical semantic network supports residual language function in chronic post‐stroke aphasia
Griffis, J. C., Nenert, R. E., Allendorfer, J. B., Vannest, J. J., Holland, S. K., Dietz, A. R., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23476 · Cited by 57
Notzon, S., Steinberg, C., Zwanzger, P., & Junghöfer, M. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.007 · Cited by 55
Frewen, P., Dozois, D. J. A., & Lanius, R. A. (2010) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/foc.8.1.foc92 · Cited by 56
Bedini, M., & Baldauf, D. (2021) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15393 · Cited by 60
Disrupted resting-state attentional networks in T2DM patients
Xia, W., Wang, S., Rao, H., Spaeth, A. M., Wang, P., Yang, Y., Huang, R., Cai, R., & Sun, H. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11148 · Cited by 57
Altered Causal Connectivity of Resting State Brain Networks in Amnesic MCI
Liang, P., Li, Z., Deshpande, G., Wang, Z., Hu, X. P., & Li, K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088476 · Cited by 60
Shifting imaging targets in multiple sclerosis: From inflammation to neurodegeneration
Vigeveno, R. M., Wiebenga, O. T., Wattjes, M. P., Geurts, J. J. G., & Barkhof, F. (2012) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.23578 · Cited by 56
Markett, S. A., Weber, B., Voigt, G., Montag, C., Felten, A., Elger, C. E., & Reuter, M. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.02.056 · Cited by 59
Localizing hand motor area using resting-state fMRI: validated with direct cortical stimulation
Qiu, T., Yan, C., Tang, W.-J., Wu, J., Zhuang, D., Yao, C., Lu, J., Zhu, F., Mao, Y. Q., & Zhou, L. (2014) · Acta Neurochirurgica · doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2236-0 · Cited by 56
Chen, N., Chou, Y., Song, A. W., & Madden, D. J. (2009) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-009-0218-4 · Cited by 58
Association of β-Amyloid Accumulation With Executive Function in Adults With Unimpaired Cognition
Tideman, P., Stomrud, E., Leuzy, A., Mattsson, N., Palmqvist, S., Hansson, O., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2022) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000013299 · Cited by 54
The ventral attention network: the mirror of the language network in the right brain hemisphere
Bernard, F., D, J.-M. L. M., Mazerand, E., Leiber, L., Meneï, P., & Minassian, A. T. (2020) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.13223 · Cited by 62
Ongoing Brain Activity and Its Role in Cognition: Dual versus Baseline Models
Northoff, G., Vatansever, D., Scalabrini, A., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2022) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/10738584221081752 · Cited by 56
Contrastive Graph Pooling for Explainable Classification of Brain Networks
Xu, J., Bian, Q., Li, X., Zhang, A. X. J., Ke, Y., Qiao, M., Zhang, W., Sim, W. K. J., & Gulyás, B. Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2024.3392988 · Cited by 63
Peraza, L. R., Colloby, S. J., Firbank, M., Greasy, G. S., McKeith, I. G., Kaiser, M., O'Brien, J. T., & Taylor, J. (2015) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4342 · Cited by 55
Mental Action Simulation Synchronizes Action–Observation Circuits across Individuals
Nummenmaa, L., Smirnov, D., Lahnakoski, J. M., Glerean, E., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Sams, M. E., & Hari, R. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0352-13.2014 · Cited by 60
The cortical dynamics underlying effective switching of auditory spatial attention
Larson, E., & Lee, A. K. C. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.006 · Cited by 54
Dysregulation between emotion and theory of mind networks in borderline personality disorder
O’Neill, A., D’Souza, A., Samson, A. C., Carballedo, A., Kerskens, C., & Frodl, T. (2014) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.11.002 · Cited by 60
Default mode network dysfunction in adults with prenatal alcohol exposure
Santhanam, P., Coles, C. D., Li, Z., Li, L., Lynch, M. E., & Hu, X. P. (2011) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.05.004 · Cited by 59
Dynamic and static contributions of the cerebrovasculature to the resting-state BOLD signal
Tak, S., Wang, D. J. J., Polimeni, J. R., Yan, L., & Chen, J. J. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.057 · Cited by 55
Griffis, J. C., Nenert, R. E., Allendorfer, J. B., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2016) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2016/4796906 · Cited by 55
Executive attention networks show altered relationship with default mode network in PD
Boord, P., Madhyastha, T. M., Askren, M. K., & Grabowski, T. J. (2016) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.11.004 · Cited by 58
Push-pull competition between bottom-up and top-down auditory attention to natural soundscapes
Huang, N. J., & Elhilali, M. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.52984 · Cited by 54
Qiu, F., Pi, Y., Liu, K., Zhu, H., Li, X., Zhang, J., & Wu, Y. (2019) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.03.008 · Cited by 59
Effective Connectivity of Functionally Anticorrelated Networks Under Lysergic Acid Diethylamide
Stoliker, D., Novelli, L., Vollenweider, F. X., Egan, G. F., Preller, K. H., & Razi, A. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.07.013 · Cited by 57
Prediction of anxious depression using multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning
Zhou, E., Wang, W., Ma, S., Xie, X., Kang, L., Xu, S., Deng, Z., Gong, Q., Nie, Z., Yao, L., et al. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120499 · Cited by 55
He, X., Qin, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Duan, Y., Song, J., Li, K., Jiang, T., & Yu, C. (2013) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.03.044 · Cited by 54
Selective Vulnerability Related to Aging in Large-Scale Resting Brain Networks
Zhang, H., Chen, W., Jiao, Y., Xu, Y. Q., Zhang, X., & Wu, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108807 · Cited by 55
Blocking of irrelevant memories by posterior alpha activity boosts memory encoding
Park, H., Lee, D. S., Kang, E., Kang, H., Hahm, J., Kim, J. S., Chung, C. K., & Jensen, O. B. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22452 · Cited by 64
Mary, A., Wens, V., Beeck, M. O. D., Leproult, R., Tiège, X. D., & Peigneux, P. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23428 · Cited by 54
Cortical networks involved in visual awareness independent of visual attention
Webb, T. W., Igelström, K. M., Schurger, A., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611505113 · Cited by 54
Global signal regression acts as a temporal downweighting process in resting-state fMRI
Nalci, A., Rao, B. D., & Liu, T. T. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.015 · Cited by 54
Panesar, S. S., Yeh, F.-C. F., Deibert, C. P., Fernandes-Cabral, D. T., Rowthu, V., Çeltikçi, P., Çeltikçi, E., Hula, W. D., Pathak, S., & Fernandez-Miranda, J. C. (2017) · Neuroradiology · doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1874-3 · Cited by 53
Wu, G., Lin, L., Zhang, Q., & Wu, J. (2017) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.09.001 · Cited by 54
Jiang, L., Qian, R., Fu, X., Zhang, D., Peng, N., Niu, C., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.045 · Cited by 54
Chan, M. M. Y., & Han, Y. M. Y. (2021) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000777 · Cited by 57
Neurodevelopment of the visual system in typically developing children
Klaver, P., Marcar, V. L., & Martin, E. (2011) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53884-0.00021-x · Cited by 53
Somatosensory‐evoked cortical activity in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy
Wingert, J. R., Sinclair, R. J., Dixit, S., Damiano, D. L., & Burton, H. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20977 · Cited by 53
Burianová, H., Ciaramelli, E., Grady, C. L., & Moscovitch, M. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.057 · Cited by 52
Brain Networks of Novelty-Driven Involuntary and Cued Voluntary Auditory Attention Shifting
Huang, S., Belliveau, J. W., Tengshe, C., & Ahveninen, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044062 · Cited by 53
Pisapia, N. D., Turatto, M., Lin, P., Jovicich, J., & Caramazza, A. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr146 · Cited by 56
Qureshi, M. N. I., Ryu, S., Song, J., Lee, K. H., & Lee, B. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00008 · Cited by 53
Large-Scale Granger Causal Brain Network based on Resting-State fMRI data
Wang, X., Ru, W., Li, F., Lin, Q., Zhao, X., & Hu, Z. (2019) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.11.006 · Cited by 53
Wolf, R. C., Sambataro, F., Vasić, N., Depping, M. S., Thomann, P., Landwehrmeyer, G. B., Süßmuth, S. D., & Orth, M. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714000579 · Cited by 52
Alterations of Directional Connectivity among Resting-State Networks in Alzheimer Disease
Li, R., Wu, X., Chen, K., Fleisher, A., Reiman, E. M., & Yao, L. (2012) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a3197 · Cited by 51
Wörsching, J., Padberg, F., Ertl-Wagner, B. B., Kumpf, U., Kirsch, B., & Keeser, D. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.001 · Cited by 56
D, J.-M. L. M., Berro, D. H., Bernard, F., Chinier, E., Leiber, L., Meneï, P., & Minassian, A. T. (2019) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1362 · Cited by 51
Zhou, Y., Wang, K., Liu, Y., Song, M., Song, S. W., & Jiang, T. (2010) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-010-9126-9 · Cited by 54
Personality in cross-cultural perspective
Dragūns, J. G. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511596544.035 · Cited by 51
Reznik, D., Trampel, R., Weiskopf, N., Witter, M. P., & Doeller, C. F. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.05.029 · Cited by 52
Han, K., Chapman, S. B., & Krawczyk, D. C. (2015) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2015.00231 · Cited by 56
How to avoid mismodelling in GLM-based fMRI data analysis: cross-validated Bayesian model selection
Soch, J., Haynes, J., & Allefeld, C. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.047 · Cited by 49
Cingulo-opercular control network and disused motor circuits joined in standby mode
Newbold, D. J., Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Seider, N. A., Montez, D. F., Gross, S. J., Zheng, A., Nielsen, A. N., Hoyt, C. R., Hampton, J. M., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2019128118 · Cited by 51
Self-citationNetwork Localization of Executive Function Deficits in Patients with Focal Thalamic Lesions
Hwang, K., Bruss, J., Tranel, D., & Boes, A. D. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01628 · Cited by 54
Shen, M. D., Shih, P., Öttl, B., Keehn, B., Leyden, K. M., Gaffrey, M. S., & Müller, R. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.008 · Cited by 50
Nakano, T. (2015) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2015.02.010 · Cited by 50
Functional connectivity of the cortical swallowing network in humans
Babaei, A., Ward, B. D., Siwiec, R. M., Ahmad, S., Kern, M., Nencka, A. S., Li, S., & Shaker, R. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.037 · Cited by 52
Ebisch, S. J. H., Perrucci, M. G., Mercuri, P., Romanelli, R., Mantini, D., Romani, G. L., Colom, R., & Saggino, A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.053 · Cited by 53
State-related functional integration and functional segregation brain networks in schizophrenia
Yu, Q., Jing Sui （Beijing Normal University）， my correct affiliation is beijing normal university, N. Q. U. O. S. A. T., Kiehl, K. A., Pearlson, G. D., & Calhoun, V. D. (2013) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.09.016 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, M. D., Corbetta, M., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., & Raichle, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-06-27
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 10046-10051
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2045758998
- Semantic Scholar
- b38a6ee957f3ce59a88e21d93d8f3e82d6da7909
- Cited by
- 2,101
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 190 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 129 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 116
- FWCI
- 24.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2006-09-05)
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5f30ns054398-02, NS06833)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 7192-06, R01MH071920)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F30 NS 054398-01, F30 NS-054398, NS 048013, R01NS048013, P50NS006833, NS 06833)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- spontaneous neuronal activity, resting-state brain activity, top-down attention, prefrontal cortex, functional connectivity, hemispheric lateralization, attentional control
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurons, Oxygen, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
