Cited by 640Visual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional Organization of Human Intraparietal and Frontal Cortex for Attending, Looking, and Pointing

Open access
Astafiev, Serguei V., Shulman, Gordon L., Stanley, Christine M., Snyder, Abraham Z., Van Essen, David C., Corbetta, Maurizio·2003·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

We studied the functional organization of human posterior parietal and frontal cortex using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to map preparatory signals for attending, looking, and pointing to a peripheral visual location. The human frontal eye field and two separate regions in the intraparietal sulcus were similarly recruited in all conditions, suggesting an attentional role that generalizes across response effectors. However, the preparation of a pointing movement selectively activated a different group of regions, suggesting a stronger role in motor planning. These regions were lateralized to the left hemisphere, activated by preparation of movements of either hand, and included the inferior and superior parietal lobule, precuneus, and posterior superior temporal sulcus, plus the dorsal premotor and anterior cingulate cortex anteriorly. Surface-based registration of macaque cortical areas onto the map of fMRI responses suggests a relatively good spatial correspondence between human and macaque parietal areas. In contrast, large interspecies differences were noted in the topography of frontal areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.23-11-04689.2003

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dorsal attention system is involved in voluntary (top-down) orienting and shows activity increases after presentation of cues indicating where, when, or to what subjects should direct their attention.

    “It is involved in voluntary (top-down) orienting and shows activity increases after presentation of cues indicating where, when, or to what subjects should direct their attention (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).”
  • The ventral attention system shows activity increases upon detection of salient targets, especially when they appear in unexpected locations.

    “This system shows activity increases upon detection of salient targets, especially when they appear in unexpected locations (5,7,13,14).”
  • Each core attention region contains multiple functional subcomponents.

    “Although we refer to the core regions of these systems as if they were homogeneous elements (e.g., IPS or FEF), each contains multiple functional subcomponents (5-7, 18, 19).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 1995, J Nucl Med, 36, 657
  2. 1905, J Psychol Neurol, 4, 177
  3. 2002, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 28, 622
  4. 1975, Am Sci, 63, 188
  5. 2002, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 28, 622

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Astafiev, S. V., Shulman, G. L., Stanley, C. M., Snyder, A. Z., Van Essen, D. C., & Corbetta, M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
4689-4699
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2167984680
Cited by
640
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 34
FWCI
16.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (NS06833)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060974, MH-60974)
  • National Eye Institute (EY 00379)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS006833, NS 06833)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
visual attention, eye movements, pointing, frontal eye field, intraparietal sulcus, posterior parietal cortex, frontal cortex, motor planning, hemispheric lateralization, precuneus, dorsal premotor cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, species differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Arm, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cues, Dominance, Cerebral, Eye Movements, Fingers, Fixation, Ocular, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Macaca, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review