Cited by 151Multisensory perception and integrationSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionTactile and Sensory Interactions

Supramodal Effects of Covert Spatial Orienting Triggered by Visual or Tactile Events

Macaluso, E., Frith, C. D., Driver, J.·2002·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to identify brain areas involved in spatial attention and determine whether these operate unimodally or supramodally for vision and touch. On a trial-by-trial basis, a symbolic auditory cue indicated the most likely side for the subsequent target, thus directing covert attention to one side. A subsequent target appeared in vision or touch on the cued or uncued side. Invalidly cued trials (as compared with valid trials) activated the temporo-parietal junction and regions of inferior frontal cortex, regardless of target modality. These brain areas have been associated with multimodal spatial coding in physiological studies of the monkey brain and were linked to a change in the location that must be attended to in the present study. The intraparietal sulcus and superior frontal cortex were also activated in our task, again, regardless of target modality, but did not show any specificity for invalidly cued trials. These results identify a supramodal network for spatial attention and reveal differential activity for inferior circuits involving the temporo-parietal junction and inferior frontal cortex (specific to invalid trials) versus more superior intraparietal-frontal circuits (common to valid and invalid trials).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892902317361912

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macaluso, E., Frith, C. D., & Driver, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2002-04-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
389-401
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2165191422
Cited by
151
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
spatial attention, covert attention, visual attention, tactile attention, temporoparietal junction, inferior frontal cortex, intraparietal sulcus, superior frontal cortex, modality specificity, auditory cueing
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cerebral Cortex, Eye Movements, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Physical Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review