The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 78 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems
Open accessAbstract
On the basis of task-related imaging studies in normal human subjects, it has been suggested that two attention systems exist in the human brain: a bilateral dorsal attention system involved in top-down orienting of attention and a right-lateralized ventral attention system involved in reorienting attention in response to salient sensory stimuli. An important question is whether this functional organization emerges only in response to external attentional demands or is represented more fundamentally in the internal dynamics of brain activity. To address this question, we examine correlations in spontaneous fluctuations of the functional MRI blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the absence of task, stimuli, or explicit attentional demands. We identify a bilateral dorsal attention system and a right-lateralized ventral attention system solely on the basis of spontaneous activity. Further, we observe regions in the prefrontal cortex correlated with both systems, a potential mechanism for mediating the functional interaction between systems. These findings demonstrate that the neuroanatomical substrates of human attention persist in the absence of external events, reflected in the correlation structure of spontaneous activity.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Spontaneous BOLD fluctuations in resting-state fMRI are sufficient to recover the dorsal and ventral human attention systems, with the dorsal system bilateral and the ventral system right-lateralized. The two systems are largely segregated, with prefrontal overlap suggesting a possible interaction site.
Key findings
- Four attention seed regions—IPS and FEF (dorsal), TPJ and VFC (ventral)—partition into two systems on the basis of spontaneous activity: IPS/FEF and TPJ/VFC correlations were significantly stronger than any other region pair (all region pairs not equally correlated, F(5,45)=23.70, P<0.0001; pairwise P<0.005).
- Correlation-map similarity and overlap also separated the systems: spatial correlation across maps differed significantly (F(5,45)=15.54, P<0.0001), as did fractional overlap (F(5,45)=17.04, P<0.0001), with IPS/FEF and TPJ/VFC pairs most similar/overlapping.
- Dorsal maps were bilateral, whereas ventral maps were right-lateralized: laterality differed by spatial correlation (F(3,27)=28.28, P<0.0001) and fractional overlap (F(3,27)=39.79, P<0.0001); IPS/FEF maps were significantly more bilateral than VFC/TPJ maps (spatial correlation P<0.05; overlap P<0.006).
- Intrinsically defined dorsal and ventral systems were largely segregated; overlap regions were found in right middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal cortex, with the prefrontal regions suggested as possible interaction sites after controlling for nonneuronal factors.
Methods
- Functional MRI data were acquired in 10 normal subjects during three resting conditions: visual fixation on a crosshair, eyes open during low-level illumination, and eyes closed; these data had been used previously in a study of anticorrelated functional networks.
- Seed regions for IPS, FEF, TPJ, and VFC were defined from a meta-analysis of previous task-based attention studies, and seed-based correlation analyses were performed on preprocessed resting-state data.
- Main analyses used temporal correlation, spatial correlation, and fractional overlap, with random-effects analysis across the population and a significance threshold of P<0.01; systems were defined by conjunction across all three resting-state conditions.
Limitations
- Stated: the exact nature of spontaneous BOLD fluctuations is unknown, and unconstrained behavior/cognition during rest cannot be ruled out as a source of some spontaneous BOLD activity, although the paper argues it is unlikely to be the predominant source.
- Stated: the inferior parietal overlap region may be attributable to nonneuronal factors such as averaging, spatial resolution, or locally coherent noise, unlike the prefrontal overlap regions.
- Evident: the sample is small (10 subjects), the seed regions are derived from prior task-based studies, and the resting-state correlation design cannot establish directionality or causality between systems or link spontaneous fluctuations directly to attentional performance.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
36 Not checked yet · 20 Own result · 10 Own interpretation · 4 No basis given · 1 Own method
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We performed this analysis and found that the intrinsically defined dorsal system, ventral system, and overlap are consistent across resting-state conditions (Fig. 11, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was a significant difference in laterality by using both the spatial correlation coefficient [F(3,27) ϭ 28.28; P Ͻ 0.0001] and the fractional overlap [F(3,27) ϭ 39.79; P Ͻ 0.0001] measures.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These systems appear to be largely segregated in their spatial topography, with only small regions of overlap in the prefrontal cortex.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The main finding in the current study is that the functional organization of the dorsal and ventral attention systems is represented in the correlation structure of spontaneous activity.”
- Also stated in: § Why Task-Related Activity Patterns Might be Reflected in Spontane- · boosted
“The current study demonstrates that the dorsal͞ ventral attention model defined on the basis of externally imposed tasks with specific attentional demands is reflected in the correlation structure of ongoing spontaneous activity.”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Why Task-Related Activity Patterns Might be Reflected in Spontane- · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, we showed that spontaneous activity is more correlated between regions within the dorsal or ventral system than between systems.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we constructed voxelwise maps of the dorsal and ventral systems defined solely on the basis of spontaneous activity, largely reproducing the spatial topography of the dorsal and ventral attention systems hypothesized on the basis of task-activation paradigms.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The intrinsically defined ventral attention system also is broadly consistent with the original task-based model of attention.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An important result of the present analysis is that the intrinsically defined dorsal and ventral attention systems are largely segregated in their spatial distribution.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As an alternative to the IPS͞TPJ link, regions correlated with both the dorsal and ventral attention systems were found in the right middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobe.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the intrinsic correlation between these two regions was no stronger than that between the FEF͞TPJ, IPS͞VFC, or FEF͞VFC.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 31
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identify a bilateral dorsal attention system and a right-lateralized ventral attention system solely on the basis of spontaneous activity.”
- Also stated in: § Quantitative Partitioning of Regions on the Basis of Spontaneous · boosted
“Taken together, these analyses demonstrate that the four attention regions are not equally related in their spontaneous BOLD fluctuations but rather should be partitioned into two distinct systems consisting of the IPS͞FEF and the TPJ͞VFC.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“Using this approach, we have shown that attentional regions can be partitioned into a bilateral dorsal attention system and a rightlateralized ventral attention system solely on the basis of spontaneous activity.”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Quantitative Partitioning of Regions on the Basis of Spontaneous · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second observation is that correlations with the IPS and FEF are largely bilateral, whereas correlations with the TPJ and VFC are much more unilateral and largely limited to the right hemisphere.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All map pairs were not equally correlated (F(5,45) ϭ 15.54; P Ͻ 0.0001), with the IPS͞FEF and the TPJ͞VFC correlation maps being the most similar.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All region pairs were not correlated equally (F(5,45) ϭ 23.70; P Ͻ 0.0001), with the IPS͞FEF correlation and TPJ͞VFC correlation being significantly stronger than the correlation between any other region pair (P Ͻ 0.005, paired t test).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the IPS and FEF correlation maps appear similar and the TPJ and VFC correlation maps appear similar, but the IPS͞FEF correlation maps appear quite distinct from the TPJ͞VFC correlation maps.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The largest region of overlap was in the right middle frontal gyrus with additional regions in the inferior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal cortex.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These factors appear to contribute to the overlap region in the inferior parietal cortex but not the other two, suggesting that the prefrontal cortex (middle and inferior frontal gyrus) may be an important locus of functional interaction between dorsal and ventral attention systems.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in contrast to the model, the intrinsically defined dorsal attention system extends beyond IPS and FEF and includes a midline supplementary motor area (SMA)͞pre-SMA region and MTϩ.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, we demonstrated that correlations in the dorsal system are bilateral, whereas those in the ventral system are lateralized to the right hemisphere.”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our intrinsically defined dorsal system is consistent with the task-based model in that it includes IPS and FEF and is largely bilateral.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is largely right-lateralized and includes TPJ and VFC as well as other right frontal areas.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The ventral system is rightlateralized and composed of the right temporal-parietal junction (TPJ) and the right ventral frontal cortex (VFC).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On the basis of behavioral, neuroimaging, lesion, and electrophysiological studies, a model has been proposed that suggests that different attentional operations during sensory orienting are carried out by two separate frontoparietal systems, a dorsal attention system and a ventral attention system (for review, see ref. 4).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“On the basis of task-related imaging studies in normal human subjects, it has been suggested that two attention systems exist in the human brain: a bilateral dorsal attention system involved in top-down orienting of attention and a right-lateralized ventral attention system involved in reorienting attention in response to salient sensory stimuli.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Activity increases also are observed in the ventral system after abrupt changes in sensory stimuli (15), at the onset and offset of task blocks (16), and at the end of a completed trial (17).”
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is involved in voluntary (top-down) orienting and shows activity increases after presentation of cues indicating where, when, or to what subjects should direct their attention (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).”
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The dorsal system is bilateral and composed of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the junction of the precentral and superior frontal sulcus (frontal eye field, FEF) in each hemisphere.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A functional interaction between the dorsal and ventral system has been proposed such that task-relevant signals from the dorsal system ''filter'' stimulus-driven signals in the ventral system, whereas stimulus-driven ''circuit-breaking'' signals from the ventral system provide an interrupt to the dorsal system, reorienting it toward salient stimuli (4,21).”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to these positive correlations, negative or anticorrelations have been noted between regions routinely modulated in opposite directions by attention demanding tasks (28,35).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This alternative perspective suggests that the brain is active even in the absence of task, primarily driven by internal dynamics, with external events modulating rather than determining the activity of the system (24)(25)(26)(27)(28).”
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Correlations have been noted between regions commonly modulated together by task paradigms such as so-matomotor, visual, auditory, language, task-negative͞default, and task-positive regions including the IPS and FEF (28,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34).”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Correspondingly, the ventral system reacts more strongly to task-relevant than irrelevant distracters (20) and exhibits activity decreases when subjects search for a difficult target (6).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, coherent spontaneous activity appears to be an important source of trial-to-trial variability in measured brain responses (42,43) and may relate to the trialto-trial variability commonly observed in human behavior (44).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Third, task-evoked activity due to a specific behavior seems to be distinct from and superimposed on top of underlying spontaneous activity (40,42).”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, coherent spontaneous activity appears to be an important source of trial-to-trial variability in measured brain responses (42,43) and may relate to the trialto-trial variability commonly observed in human behavior (44).”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, SMA͞pre-SMA and MTϩ typically have not been considered part of the dorsal attention system for various reasons.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This extended system is consistent with previous resting-state correlation studies (28,45) and has been dubbed by us the task-positive network (28).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fact that IPS and FEF seem to share some functionality not present in the more extended network may relate to the stronger intrinsic correlation between these two regions (see Fig. 1).”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although previous task-based studies have reported right lateralization of this network (4, 15, 16, 47), we directly test and quantify this laterality on the basis of spontaneous activity.”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, an inability of the ventral system to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant stimuli could cause increased distractibility, and an inability of the dorsal system to receive reorienting signals could cause an increase in perseveration.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the intrinsically defined dorsal and ventral attention systems are largely segregated in their spatial topography, the original model and task-related findings suggest that there must be some mechanism of information exchange between them.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Both distractibility and perseveration are hallmarks of prefrontal cortex damage (50).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted in the introduction, the ventral system responds more strongly to task-relevant distracters than irrelevant ones (termed contingent reorienting), and the dorsal system exhibits an activity increase in addition to the ventral system when a reorientation of attention is needed.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This information exchange has been hypothesized to occur between the right IPS and right TPJ (4).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Consistent with this finding, recent lesion studies suggest that contingent reorienting remains intact and is even enhanced after IPS damage (S.Shomstein, personal communication), suggesting that the IPS is not required for top-down information to reach the ventral attention system.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites S.Shomstein, personal communication
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, regions routinely modulated together during task conditions tend to be strongly correlated in their spontaneous activity and regions modulated in opposite directions tend to be anticorrelated (28).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the region in the parietal lobe may be due to spatial blurring, the two regions in the prefrontal cortex are not, and therefore may represent, important sites of functional interaction between the two systems.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This observation is not without precedent, because the currently identified prefrontal cortex regions have been implicated in sustained attention, vigilance, and both maintaining and updating of a task set (49)(50)(51).”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These possibilities are not mutually exclusive, and all may be relevant to understanding why systems defined on the basis of task-related activity patterns, such as the dorsal and ventral attention systems, can be observed in patterns of spontaneous neuronal activity in the absence of task.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fact that the dorsal and ventral systems are largely segregated may be important for the flexibility observed in the task-response patterns of these two systems, allowing them to be modulated together, independently, or in opposite directions.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Coherent spontaneous fluctuations are present continuously across all brain regions.
“Finally, coherent spontaneous fluctuations are present continuously across all brain regions.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Functional pathways critical to vision, motor function, audition, language, reading, and attention are detectable as enhanced FC computed from at rest inter-region oscillatory synchronization determined via functional magnetic resonance imaging (34–42).”
From Elevated functional connectivity along a corticostriatal loop and the mechanism of auditory/verbal hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia (2011) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Self-citationAn Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553
Self-citationNeural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0135058100 · Cited by 6,358
Llinás, R. R. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3059497 · Cited by 2,285
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- D. Cordes, V. M. Haughton, K. Arfanakis, G. J. Wendt, P. A. Turski, C. H. Moritz, M. A. Quigley, M. E. Meyerand Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21, 1636–1644 (2000).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Thomas Yeo, B. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., Roffman, J. L., Smoller, J. W., Zöllei, L., Polimeni, J. R., et al. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2011 · Cited by 9,182
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 · Cited by 7,429
Self-citationThe organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., Castellanos, A., Diaz, J. C., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00339.2011 · Cited by 7,304
Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Fox, M. D., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2201 · Cited by 6,700
Self-citationMapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex
Hagmann, P., Cammoun, L., Gigandet, X., Meuli, R., Honey, C. J., Wedeen, V. J., & Sporns, O. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159 · Cited by 4,173
Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain
Power, J. D., Cohen, A. L., Nelson, S. M., Wig, G. S., Barnes, K. A., Church, J. A., Vogel, A. C., Laumann, T. O., Miezin, F. M., Schlaggar, B. L., et al. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006 · Cited by 4,124
The brain's default mode network
Raichle, M. E. (2015) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030 · Cited by 3,904
Self-citationThe reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017 · Cited by 3,889
Self-citationLocal-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI
Schaefer, A., Kong, R., Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Zuo, X.-N., Holmes, A. J., Eickhoff, S. B., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx179 · Cited by 3,657
DPARSF: a MATLAB toolbox for “pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI
Yan (2010) · Frontiers in System Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00013 · Cited by 3,475
Hölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611419671 · Cited by 3,024
Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state
Allen, E. A., Damaraju, E., Plis, S. M., Erhardt, E. B., Eichele, T., & Calhoun, V. D. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs352 · Cited by 2,992
Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations
Hutchison, R. M., Womelsdorf, T., Allen, E. A., Bandettini, P. A., Calhoun, V. D., Corbetta, M., Della Penna, S., Duyn, J. H., Glover, G. H., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079 · Cited by 2,962
Self-citationSridharan, D., Levitin, D. J., & Menon, V. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800005105 · Cited by 2,892
Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Fair, D. A., Miezin, F. M., Cohen, A. L., Wenger, K. K., Dosenbach, R. A. T., Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Raichle, M. E., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704320104 · Cited by 2,632
Self-citationExperimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018 · Cited by 2,573
Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles
Bressler, S. L., & Menon, V. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.004 · Cited by 2,348
Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain
Mantini, D., Perrucci, M. G., Del Gratta, C., Romani, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0700668104 · Cited by 1,938
Self-citationEvidence for a Frontoparietal Control System Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity
Vincent, J. L., Kahn, I., Snyder, A. Z., Raichle, M. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2008) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.90355.2008 · Cited by 1,869
Self-citationVan Dijk, K. R. A., Hedden, T., Venkataraman, A., Evans, K. C., Lazar, S. W., & Buckner, R. L. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00783.2009 · Cited by 1,844
Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain
Vincent, J. L., Patel, G. H., Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Baker, J. T., Van Essen, D. C., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, L. H., Corbetta, M., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05758 · Cited by 1,786
Self-citationInteroceptive predictions in the brain
Barrett, L. F., & Simmons, W. K. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3950 · Cited by 1,766
Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales
Honey, C. J., Kötter, R., Breakspear, M. J., & Sporns, O. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701519104 · Cited by 1,727
Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: A systematic review
Broyd, S. J., Demanuele, C., Debener, S., Helps, S. K., James, C. J., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.002 · Cited by 1,675
Disruption of Large-Scale Brain Systems in Advanced Aging
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Lustig, C., Head, D., Raichle, M. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.038 · Cited by 1,592
Self-citationMindfulness training modifies subsystems of attention
JHA, A. P., KROMPINGER, J., & BAIME, M. J. (2007) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.7.2.109 · Cited by 1,580
Functional brain networks develop from a local to distributed organization
Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Power, J. D., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Church, J. A., Miezin, F. M., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000381 · Cited by 1,530
Default Mode Network Activity and Connectivity in Psychopathology
Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., & Ford, J. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143049 · Cited by 1,465
Dorsal and Ventral Attention Systems: Distinct Neural Circuits but Collaborative Roles
Vossel, S., Geng, J. J., & Fink, G. R. (2014) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858413494269 · Cited by 1,438
Normal development of brain circuits
Tau, G. Z., & Peterson, B. S. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.115 · Cited by 1,391
Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains
Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Gilmore, A. W., Newbold, D. J., Greene, D. J., Berg, J. J., Ortega, M., Hoyt-Drazen, C., Gratton, C., Sun, H., et al. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.011 · Cited by 1,335
Self-citationSpatial Neglect and Attention Networks
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113731 · Cited by 1,318
Self-citationCompetition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability
Kelly, A. M. C., Uddin, L. Q., Biswal, B. B., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.008 · Cited by 1,287
Spreng, R. N., Stevens, W. D., Chamberlain, J. P., Gilmore, A. W., & Schacter, D. L. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.016 · Cited by 1,256
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Leech, R., Hellyer, P. J., Shanahan, M., Feilding, A., Tagliazucchi, E., Chialvo, D. R., & Nutt, D. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00020 · Cited by 1,252
The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account
Cabeza, R. E. L., Ciaramelli, E., Olson, I. R., & Moscovitch, M. (2008) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2459 · Cited by 1,256
Reduced resting-state brain activity in the “default network” in normal aging
Damoiseaux, J. S., Beckmann, C. F., Arigita, E. J. S., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., Smith, S. M., & Rombouts, S. A. R. B. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm207 · Cited by 1,187
Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity
Fox, M. (2010) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00019 · Cited by 1,219
Self-citationUddin, L. Q., Clare Kelly, A. M., Biswal, B. B., Xavier Castellanos, F., & Milham, M. P. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20531 · Cited by 1,135
Resting-State fMRI: A Review of Methods and Clinical Applications
Lee, M. H., Smyser, C. D., & Shimony, J. S. (2012) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a3263 · Cited by 1,195
Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Loughead, J., Ruparel, K., Elliott, M. A., Hakonarson, H., Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063 · Cited by 1,125
Gong, G., He, Y., Concha, L., Lebel, C., Gross, D. W., Evans, A. C., & Beaulieu, C. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn102 · Cited by 1,112
A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention
de Schotten, M. T., Dell'Acqua, F., Forkel, S. J., Simmons, A., Vergani, F., Murphy, D. G. M., & Catani, M. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2905 · Cited by 1,103
The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions
Cole, M. W., & Schneider, W. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.071 · Cited by 1,091
BOLD correlates of EEG topography reveal rapid resting-state network dynamics
Britz, J., Van De Ville, D., & Michel, C. M. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.052 · Cited by 1,070
Selective changes of resting-state networks in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s disease
Sorg, C., Riedl, V., Mühlau, M., Calhoun, V. D., Eichele, T., Läer, L., Drzezga, A., Förstl, H., Kurz, A., Zimmer, C., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0708803104 · Cited by 1,036
DeYoung, C. G. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004 · Cited by 1,057
The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease
Anticevic, A., Cole, M. W., Murray, J. D., Corlett, P. R., Wang, X.-J., & Krystal, J. H. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.008 · Cited by 978
Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing.
Gilbert, C., & Sigman, M. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.019 · Cited by 1,008
Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity
Schölvinck, M. L., Maier, A., Ye, F. Q., Duyn, J. H., & Leopold, D. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913110107 · Cited by 939
The Resting Brain: Unconstrained yet Reliable
Shehzad, Z. E., Kelly, C. A. M., Reiss, P. T., Gee, D. G., Gotimer, K., Uddin, L. Q., Lee, S. H., Margulies, D. S., Roy, A. K., Biswal, B. B., et al. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn256 · Cited by 948
He, B. J., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Epstein, A. A., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013 · Cited by 945
Self-citationOpportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3423 · Cited by 912
Disease and the brain's dark energy
Zhang, D., & Raichle, M. E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.198 · Cited by 928
Self-citationPrecuneus Is a Functional Core of the Default-Mode Network
Utevsky, A. V., Smith, D. V., & Huettel, S. A. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4227-13.2014 · Cited by 925
Prestimulus Oscillatory Activity in the Alpha Band Predicts Visual Discrimination Ability
van Dijk, H., Schoffelen, J., Oostenveld, R., & Jensen, O. B. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1853-07.2008 · Cited by 831
Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: beyond the prefrontal–striatal model
Castellanos, F. X., & Proal, E. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.007 · Cited by 831
Goulden, N., Khusnulina, A., Davis, N. J., Bracewell, R. M., Bokde, A. L., McNulty, J. P., & Mullins, P. G. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.052 · Cited by 810
Development of large-scale functional brain networks in children
Supekar, K., Musen, M., & Menon, V. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000157 · Cited by 807
Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain
Cauda, F., D'Agata, F., Sacco, K., Duca, S., Geminiani, G., & Vercelli, A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.049 · Cited by 793
The functional significance of delta oscillations in cognitive processing
Harmony, T. (2013) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2013.00083 · Cited by 788
Segregated fronto-cerebellar circuits revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity
Krienen, F. M., & Buckner, R. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp135 · Cited by 782
Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior
Fox, M., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.023 · Cited by 773
Self-citationMapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex
Margulies, D. S., Kelly, C. A. M., Uddin, L. Q., Biswal, B. B., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.019 · Cited by 777
Zeng, L.-L., Shen, H., Liu, L., Wang, L., Li, B., Fang, P., Zhou, Z., Li, Y., & Hu, D. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws059 · Cited by 748
Zuo, X.-N., Kelly, C., Adelstein, J. S., Klein, D. F., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.080 · Cited by 744
Hutchison, R. M., Womelsdorf, T., Gati, J. S., Everling, S., & Menon, R. S. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22058 · Cited by 732
Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks
de Pasquale, F., Della Penna, S., Snyder, A. Z., Lewis, C., Mantini, D., Marzetti, L., Belardinelli, P., Ciancetta, L., Pizzella, V., Romani, G. L., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913863107 · Cited by 698
Self-citationRomei, V., Brodbeck, V., Michel, C. M., Amedi, A., Pascual‐Leone, Á., & Thut, G. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm229 · Cited by 717
Towards a universal taxonomy of macro-scale functional human brain networks
Uddin, L. Q., Yeo, B. T. T., & Spreng, R. N. (2019) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-019-00744-6 · Cited by 683
Electrophysiological correlates of the brain's intrinsic large-scale functional architecture
He, B. J., Snyder, A. Z., Zempel, J. M., Smyth, M. D., & Raichle, M. E. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0807010105 · Cited by 670
Self-citationTwo systems of resting state connectivity between the insula and cingulate cortex
Taylor, K. S., Seminowicz, D. A., & Davis, K. D. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20705 · Cited by 665
Liu, X., & Duyn, J. H. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1216856110 · Cited by 663
Etkin, A., Prater, K. E., Schatzberg, A. F., Menon, V., & Greicius, M. D. (2009) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.104 · Cited by 664
Tagliazucchi, E., & Laufs, H. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.020 · Cited by 656
Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke
Wang, L. Y., Yu, C., Chen, H., Qin, W., Yong He, A., Fan, F., Zhang, Y., Wang, M., Li, K., Zang, Y., et al. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq043 · Cited by 656
Uncovering Intrinsic Modular Organization of Spontaneous Brain Activity in Humans
Yong He, A., Wang, J., Wang, L. Y., Chen, Z. J., Yan, C., Yang, H., Tang, H., Zhu, C., Gong, Q., Zang, Y., et al. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005226 · Cited by 635
Levy, B. J., & Wagner, A. D. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05958.x · Cited by 625
Salience Network–Based Classification and Prediction of Symptom Severity in Children With Autism
Uddin, L. Q., Supekar, K., Lynch, C. J., Khouzam, A., Phillips, J., Feinstein, C., Ryali, S., & Menon, V. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.104 · Cited by 621
Neuroanatomical and neurochemical bases of theory of mind
Abu-Akel, A. M., & Shamay‐Tsoory, S. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.012 · Cited by 659
Fox, M. D., Buckner, R. L., Liu, H., Chakravarty, M. M., Lozano, A. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1405003111 · Cited by 617
Self-citationGraph-based network analysis of resting-state functional MRI
Wang, J. (2010) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00016 · Cited by 614
Sheline, Y. I., Raichle, M. E., Snyder, A. Z., Morris, J. C., Head, D., Wang, S., & Mintun, M. A. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.08.024 · Cited by 597
Self-citationBraga, R. M., & Buckner, R. L. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.038 · Cited by 602
Brier, M. R., Thomas, J. B., Snyder, A. Z., Benzinger, T. L., Zhang, D., Raichle, M. E., Holtzman, D. M., Morris, J. C., & Ances, B. M. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5698-11.2012 · Cited by 595
Self-citationKong, R., Li, J., Orbán, C., Sabuncu, M. R., Liu, H., Schaefer, A., Sun, N., Zuo, X., Holmes, A. J., Eickhoff, S. B., et al. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy123 · Cited by 615
Fair, D. A., Schlaggar, B. L., Cohen, A. L., Miezin, F. M., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Wenger, K. K., Fox, M., Snyder, A. Z., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.051 · Cited by 615
Self-citationEnhanced Brain Correlations during Rest Are Related to Memory for Recent Experiences
Tambini, A., Ketz, N., & Davachi, L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.001 · Cited by 596
Functional network dysfunction in anxiety and anxiety disorders
Sylvester, C. M., Corbetta, M., Raichle, M. E., Rodebaugh, T. L., Schlaggar, B. L., Sheline, Y. I., Zorumski, C. F., & Lenze, E. J. (2012) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.04.012 · Cited by 579
Self-citationResting state fMRI in Alzheimer's disease: beyond the default mode network
Agosta, F., Pievani, M., Geroldi, C., Copetti, M., Frisoni, G. B., & Filippi, M. (2011) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.06.007 · Cited by 599
Development of Anterior Cingulate Functional Connectivity from Late Childhood to Early Adulthood
Kelly, A. M. C., Di Martino, A., Uddin, L. Q., Shehzad, Z., Gee, D. G., Reiss, P. T., Margulies, D. S., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn117 · Cited by 572
Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals
Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Viinikainen, M., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Hari, R., & Sams, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1206095109 · Cited by 538
Ciaramelli, E., Grady, C. L., & Moscovitch, M. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.022 · Cited by 534
Sestieri, C., Corbetta, M., Romani, G. L., & Shulman, G. L. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3335-10.2011 · Cited by 523
Self-citationUnrest at rest: Default activity and spontaneous network correlations
Buckner, R. L., & Vincent, J. L. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.010 · Cited by 523
Self-citationMars, R. B., Sallet, J., Schuffelgen, U., Jbabdi, S., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr268 · Cited by 520
Resting-state brain networks: literature review and clinical applications
Rosazza, C., & Minati, L. (2011) · Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10072-011-0636-y · Cited by 535
Zuo, X., Xu, T., Jiang, L., Yang, Z., Cao, X., Yong He, A., Zang, Y., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.017 · Cited by 510
Sadaghiani, S., Scheeringa, R., Lehongre, K., Morillon, B., Giraud, A.-L., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1004-10.2010 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, M. D., Corbetta, M., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., & Raichle, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-06-27
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 10046-10051
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2045758998
- Semantic Scholar
- b38a6ee957f3ce59a88e21d93d8f3e82d6da7909
- Cited by
- 2,101
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 190 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 129 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 116
- FWCI
- 24.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2006-09-05)
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5f30ns054398-02, NS06833)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 7192-06, R01MH071920)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F30 NS 054398-01, F30 NS-054398, NS 048013, R01NS048013, P50NS006833, NS 06833)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- spontaneous neuronal activity, resting-state brain activity, top-down attention, prefrontal cortex, functional connectivity, hemispheric lateralization, attentional control
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurons, Oxygen, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
