Cited by 227Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNerve injury and regeneration

Extensive remyelination of the CNS leads to functional recovery

Open access
Duncan, I. D., Brower, A., Kondo, Y., Curlee, J. F., Schultz, R. D.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Remyelination of the CNS in multiple sclerosis is thought to be important to restore conduction and protect axons against degeneration. Yet the role that remyelination plays in clinical recovery of function remains unproven. Here, we show that cats fed an irradiated diet during gestation developed a severe neurologic disease resulting from extensive myelin vacuolation and subsequent demyelination. Despite the severe myelin degeneration, axons remained essentially intact. There was a prompt endogenous response by cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage to the demyelination, with remyelination occurring simultaneously. Cats that were returned to a normal diet recovered slowly so that by 3–4 months they were neurologically normal. Histological examination of the CNS at this point showed extensive remyelination that was especially notable in the optic nerve where almost the entire nerve was remyelinated. Biochemical analysis of the diet and tissues from affected cats showed no dietary deficiencies or toxic accumulations. Thus, although the etiology of this remarkable disease remains unknown, it shows unequivocally that where axons are preserved remyelination is the default pathway in the CNS in nonimmune-mediated demyelinating disease. Most importantly, it confirms the clinical relevance of remyelination and its ability to restore function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0812500106

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Remyelination is a regenerative process of the adult CNS that restores saltatory impulse conduction and trophic support to axons.

    “Remyelination is a crucial regenerative process in demyelinating diseases, limiting persisting damage to the CNS. It restores saltatory nerve conduction and ensures trophic support of axons.”

    From BCAS1-positive oligodendrocytes enable efficient cortical remyelination in multiple sclerosis (2025) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Discussion states that remyelination restores fast, secure saltatory conduction, and the introductory passage says it can protect demyelinated fibers against loss. Our copy does not say that remyelination ensures trophic support of axons; protection against loss does not establish that specific mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]Smith KJ, Blakemore WF, McDonald WI. The restoration of conduction by central remyelination. Brain. 1981;104:383–404. doi: 10.1093/brain/104.2.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [2]Kuhlman T, Lingfeld G, Bitsch A, Schuchardt J, Brück W. Acute axonal damage in multiple sclerosis is most extensive in early disease stages and decreases over time. Brain. 2002;125:2202–2212. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [3]Irvine KA, Blakemore WF. Remyelination protects axons from demyelination-associated axon degeneration. Brain. 2008;131:1464–1477. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Waxman SG. Axonal conduction and injury in multiple sclerosis: The role of sodium channels. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:932–941. doi: 10.1038/nrn2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [5]Compston A. In: McAlpine's Multiple Sclerosis. Compston A, editor. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. [7]Murray PD, McGavern DB, Sathornsumetee S, Rodriguez M. Spontaneous remyelination following extensive demyelination is associated with improved neurological function in a viral model of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2001;124:1403–1416. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.7.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [8]Jeffery ND, Blakemore WF. Locomotor deficits induced by experimental spinal cord demyelination are abolished by spontaneous remyelination. Brain. 1997;120:27–37. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [9]Liebetanz D, Merkler D. Effects of commissural de- and remyelination on motor skill behaviour in the cuprizone mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Exp Neurol. 2006;202:217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  9. [10]Utzschneider DA, Archer DR, Kocsis JD, Waxman SG, Duncan ID. Transplantation of glial cells enhances action potential conduction of ameyelinated spinal cord axons in the myelin-deficient rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:53–57. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [11]Felts PA, Baker TA, Smith KJ. Conduction in segmentally demyelinated mammalian central axons. J Neurosci. 2007;17:7267–7277. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-19-07267.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [12]Felts PA, Smith KJ. Conduction properties of central nerve fibers remyelinated by Schwann cells. Brain Res. 1992;574:178–192. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90815-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [14]Carroll WM, Jennings AR, Ironside LJ. Identification of the adult resting progenitor cell by autoradiographic tracking of oligodendrocyte precursors in experimental CNS demyelination. Brain. 1998;121:293–302. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.2.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [15]Jennings AR, Kirilak Y, Carroll WM. In situ characterization of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in adult mammalian optic nerve. J Neurocytol. 2002;31:27–39. doi: 10.1023/a:1022567414294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [16]Franklin RJ, ffrench-Constant C. Remyelination in the CNS: From biology to therapy. Nat Neurosci Rev. 2008;9:839–855. doi: 10.1038/nrn2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  15. [17]Ludwin SK, Bakker DA. Can oligodendrocytes attached to myelin proliferate? J Neurosci. 1988;8:1239–1244. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-04-01239.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [18]Cassidy JP, et al. Leukoencephalomyelopathy in specific pathogen-free cats. Vet Pathol. 2007;44:912–916. doi: 10.1354/vp.44-6-912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [19]Hagen G, Blakemore WF, Bjerkås I. Ultrastructural findings in spongy degeneration of white matter in silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) Acta Neuropathol. 1990;80:590–596. doi: 10.1007/BF00307625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [20]Oldfors A, Tulinius M. Mitochondrial encephalomyopathies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62:217–227. doi: 10.1093/jnen/62.3.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [21]Li FY, et al. Canine spongiform leukoencephalomyelopathy is associated with a missense mutation in cytochrome b. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;21:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [22]Duncan ID. In: Neurotoxicity of Industrial and Commercial Chemicals. O'Donoghue JL, editor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 1995. pp. 15–50. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duncan, I. D., Brower, A., Kondo, Y., Curlee, J. F., & Schultz, R. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 445 Easterday Lane, Madison, WI 53706; and
  • Harlan Laboratories, P.O. Box 44220, Madison, WI 53744
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-04-21
Volume
106
Issue
16
Pages
6832-6836
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2050596253
Cited by
227
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Multiple Sclerosis Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
remyelination, demyelination, multiple sclerosis, functional recovery, oligodendrocyte lineage, optic nerve, cats
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Central Nervous System, Female, Myelin Sheath, Optic Nerve, Pregnancy, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review