Cited by 94T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyEvolution and Genetic DynamicsArtificial Immune Systems Applications

Peripheral selection rather than thymic involution explains sudden contraction in naive CD4 T-cell diversity with age

Open access
Johnson, Philip L. F., Yates, Andrew J., Goronzy, Jörg J., Antia, Rustom·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A diverse array of T cells is required for defense against pathogens. The naive CD4 T-cell repertoire reaches its peak diversity by early human adulthood and is maintained until older age. Surprisingly, around age 70, this diversity appears to plummet abruptly. A similar qualitative pattern holds for the CD4 T memory-cell population. We used mathematical models to explore different hypotheses for how such a loss of diversity might occur. The prevailing hypotheses suggest that the loss of diversity is due to a decline in emigration of cells from the thymus or a contraction in total number of cells. Our models reject these mechanisms because they yield only a gradual and minimal decline in the repertoire instead of the observed sudden and profound decrease later in life. We propose that an abrupt decline in the repertoire could be caused by the accumulation of mutations (defined here as any cell-intrinsic heritable event) that provide a short-term fitness advantage to a small number of T-cell clones (e.g., by an increased division rate or decreased death rate), with the person as a whole incurring the long-term cost of a decreased ability to fight infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1209283110

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In silico simulation predicted severe repertoire contraction in some individuals under markedly uneven homeostatic proliferation, independent of thymic function.

    “In silico simulation of T cell homeostasis with age predicted severe repertoire contraction to occur in some individuals, under conditions of markedly uneven homeostatic proliferation and irrespective of thymic function”

    From Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging (2017) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 2012

  • Simulations had highly variable outcomes, suggesting a large stochastic component in failure to maintain a diverse repertoire.

    “simulations had highly variable outcomes suggesting a large stochastic component in the failure to maintain a diverse repertoire.”

    From Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging (2017) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, P. L. F., Yates, A. J., Goronzy, J. J., & Antia, R.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-12-10
Volume
109
Issue
52
Pages
21432-21437
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2105527855
Cited by
94
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AI093870, AI057266, AI090019)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U01GM070749)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI049334, U19AI090019, U19AI057266, R01AI093870)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Artificial Immune Systems Applications
Keywords
naive CD4+ T cells, T cell receptor diversity, thymic involution, thymic emigration, aging, immunosenescence, clonal expansion, somatic mutation accumulation, T cell memory, division rate, cell death rate
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Humans, Mutation, Thymus Gland, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Cellular Senescence, Models, Immunological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review