Cited by 953Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex

Open access
Fedorenko, Evelina, Duncan, John, Kanwisher, Nancy·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: One of the oldest debates in cognitive neuroscience concerns the degree of functional specialization present in the human brain. Prior work has discovered several highly specialized components dedicated to particular mental functions, like face recognition or motion perception. However, our cognitive versatility suggests the additional existence of more general-purpose machinery. Building on prior neuroimaging evidence, along with neurophysiological evidence from non-human primates, we searched for such domain-general brain regions in humans. Seven diverse demanding cognitive tasks produced overlapping activation at the individual-subject level in a number of frontal and parietal brain regions. Thus, human cognition arises from hardware that includes not only specialized components, but also very general-purpose ones that plausibly enable us to solve novel problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1315235110

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 99 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 953

Metadata

Authors
Fedorenko, E., Duncan, J., & Kanwisher, N.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-09-23
Volume
110
Issue
41
Pages
16616-16621
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2001896589
Cited by
952
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 2
FWCI
23.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (057522, 0904625)
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • National Institutes of Health (5k99hd057522-02)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY013455)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K99 HD-057522)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
domain generality, domain specificity, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, cognitive flexibility, arithmetic, working memory, cognitive inhibition, single-subject analysis, functional topography
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review