Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 591

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impaired neuropathic pain responses in mice lacking the chemokine receptor CCR2

Open access
Abbadie, Catherine, Lindia, Jill A., Cumiskey, Anne Marie, Peterson, Larry B., Mudgett, John S., Bayne, Ellen K., DeMartino, Julie A., MacIntyre, D. Euan, Forrest, Michael J.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Mice lacking the chemokine receptor chemotactic cytokine receptor 2 (CCR2) have a marked attenuation of monocyte recruitment in response to various inflammatory stimuli and a reduction of inflammatory lesions in models of demyelinating disease. In the present study, we compared nociceptive responses in inflammatory and neuropathic models of pain in CCR2 knockout and wild-type mice. In acute pain tests, responses were equivalent in CCR2 knockout and wild-type mice. In models of inflammatory pain, CCR2 knockout mice showed a 70% reduction in phase 2 of the intraplantar formalin-evoked pain response but only a modest (20–30%) and nonsignificant reduction of mechanical allodynia after intraplantar Freund's adjuvant (CFA). In a model of neuropathic pain, the development of mechanical allodynia was totally abrogated in CCR2 knockout mice. CFA administration induced marked up-regulation of CCR2 mRNA in the skin and a moderate increase in the sciatic nerve and dorsal root ganglia (DRG). In response to nerve ligation, persistent and marked up-regulation of CCR2 mRNA was evident in the nerve and DRG. Disruption of Schwann cells in response to nerve lesion resulted in infiltration of CCR2-positive monocytes/macrophages not only to the neuroma but also to the DRG. Chronic pain also resulted in the appearance of activated CCR2-positive microglia in the spinal cord. Collectively, these data suggest that the recruitment and activation of macrophages and microglia peripherally and in neural tissue may contribute to both inflammatory and neuropathic pain states. Accordingly, blockade of the CCR2 receptor may provide a novel therapeutic modality for the treatment of chronic pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1331358100

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Abbadie, C., Lindia, J. A., Cumiskey, A. M., Peterson, L. B., Mudgett, J. S., Bayne, E. K., DeMartino, J. A., MacIntyre, D. E., & Forrest, M. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-06-13
Volume
100
Issue
13
Pages
7947-7952
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2000814289
Cited by
591
References
0
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.