Cited by 629Zoonotic diseases and public healthViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Rodent reservoirs of future zoonotic diseases

Open access
Han, Barbara A., Schmidt, John Paul, Bowden, Sarah E., Drake, John M.·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Forecasting reservoirs of zoonotic disease is a pressing public health priority. We apply machine learning to datasets describing the biological, ecological, and life history traits of rodents, which collectively carry a disproportionate number of zoonotic pathogens. We identify particular rodent species predicted to be novel zoonotic reservoirs and geographic regions from which new emerging pathogens are most likely to arise. We also describe trait profiles—complexes of biological features—that distinguish reservoirs from nonreservoirs. Generally, the most permissive rodent reservoirs display a fast-paced life history strategy, maximizing near-term fitness by having many altricial young that begin reproduction early and reproduce frequently. These findings may constitute an important lead in guiding the search for novel disease reservoirs in the wild.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1501598112

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, B. A., Schmidt, J. P., Bowden, S. E., & Drake, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-05-18
Volume
112
Issue
22
Pages
7039-7044
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1917173555
Cited by
629
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11
FWCI
35.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Funders
Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health (Postdoctoral Research Fellowship)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
rodent reservoirs, zoonoses, host traits, range size, lifetime reproductive output, biogeography, emerging infectious diseases, disease prediction, machine learning prediction
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Disease Reservoirs, Forecasting, Geography, Humans, Population Density, Public Health, Regression Analysis, Reproduction, Rodentia, Sexual Maturation, Species Specificity, Zoonoses, Computational Biology, Geographic Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review