CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 238Sex and Gender in HealthcareDiversity and Career in MedicineCareer Development and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex inclusion in basic research drives discovery

Open access
Klein, Sabra L., Schiebinger, Londa, Stefanick, Marcia L., Cahill, Larry, Danska, Jayne, de Vries, Geert J., Kibbe, Melina R., McCarthy, Margaret M., Mogil, Jeffrey S., Woodruff, Teresa K., Zucker, Irving·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1502843112PMC PMC4418862
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Much of our understanding of disease processes and treatments begins with preclinical studies that use nonhuman animals and cell cultures. Such studies are integral to biomedical research and the development pipeline for drugs, devices, and biologics. Most preclinical biomedical research, however, has been conducted with inadequate consideration of sex (1⇓–3).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1502843112

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ; US General Accounting Office Drug Safety: Most Drugs Withdrawn in Recent Years Had Greater Health Risks for Women (Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC, 2001).
  2. V Regitz-Zagrosek, Sex and gender differences in health. European Molecular Biology Organization Reports 13, 596–603 (2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 238

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Klein, S. L., Schiebinger, L., Stefanick, M. L., Cahill, L., Danska, J., de Vries, G. J., Kibbe, M. R., McCarthy, M. M., Mogil, J. S., Woodruff, T. K., & Zucker, I.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • History of Science, and
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302;
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-04-20
Volume
112
Issue
17
Pages
5257-5258
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1502843112
PMC
PMC4418862
OpenAlex
W2095228051
Cited by
238
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 7
FWCI
31.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA060553)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
sex differences, basic research, scientific discovery, gender diversity in research
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Humans, Male, Reproduction, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review