Cited by 152Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees

Open access
Ardesch, Dirk Jan, Scholtens, Lianne H., Li, Longchuan, Preuss, Todd M., Rilling, James K., van den Heuvel, Martijn P.·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The development of complex cognitive functions during human evolution coincides with pronounced encephalization and expansion of white matter, the brain’s infrastructure for region-to-region communication. We investigated adaptations of the human macroscale brain network by comparing human brain wiring with that of the chimpanzee, one of our closest living primate relatives. White matter connectivity networks were reconstructed using diffusion-weighted MRI in humans ( n = 57) and chimpanzees ( n = 20) and then analyzed using network neuroscience tools. We demonstrate higher network centrality of connections linking multimodal association areas in humans compared with chimpanzees, together with a more pronounced modular topology of the human connectome. Furthermore, connections observed in humans but not in chimpanzees particularly link multimodal areas of the temporal, lateral parietal, and inferior frontal cortices, including tracts important for language processing. Network analysis demonstrates a particularly high contribution of these connections to global network integration in the human brain. Taken together, our comparative connectome findings suggest an evolutionary shift in the human brain toward investment of neural resources in multimodal connectivity facilitating neural integration, combined with an increase in language-related connectivity supporting functional specialization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1818512116

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computational processing might have been facilitated by some of the changes presented here, at least in some of the circuits that have expanded in our lineage.

    “Computational processing might have been facilitated by some of the changes presented here, at least in some of the circuits that have expanded in our lineage111,112, since subtle maturational differences early in development113 may have had a considerable impact on the phenotype.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ardesch, D. J., Scholtens, L. H., Li, L., Preuss, T. M., Rilling, J. K., & van den Heuvel, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Connectome Lab, Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-03-18
Volume
116
Issue
14
Pages
7101-7106
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2923076661
Cited by
152
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-16-015)
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (P01AG026423, OD P51OD11132)
  • National Chimpanzee Brain Resource (R24NS092988)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (MH100029)
  • Mental Health and Quality of Life (2015)
  • ALW Open (ALWOP.179)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
human brain evolution, chimpanzees, white matter connectivity, connectome, network centrality, temporal cortex, parietal cortex, inferior frontal cortex, encephalization, comparative neuroanatomy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Pan troglodytes, Cognition, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Language, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult, Connectome, Multimodal Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review