Cited by 1,334Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Network Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modular Brain Networks

Open access
Sporns, Olaf, Betzel, Richard F.·2016·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

The development of new technologies for mapping structural and functional brain connectivity has led to the creation of comprehensive network maps of neuronal circuits and systems. The architecture of these brain networks can be examined and analyzed with a large variety of graph theory tools. Methods for detecting modules, or network communities, are of particular interest because they uncover major building blocks or subnetworks that are particularly densely connected, often corresponding to specialized functional components. A large number of methods for community detection have become available and are now widely applied in network neuroscience. This article first surveys a number of these methods, with an emphasis on their advantages and shortcomings; then it summarizes major findings on the existence of modules in both structural and functional brain networks and briefly considers their potential functional roles in brain evolution, wiring minimization, and the emergence of functional specialization and complex dynamics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033634

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structural connectivity can be partitioned into modules (communities) that reflect clusters embedded in the brain's wiring.

    “At the mesocale, structural connectivity can be partitioned into modules (also known as communities) that reflect the presence of clusters embedded in the brain’s wiring (Betzel, 2020; Sporns and Betzel, 2016).”
  • When neural networks are hierarchically segregated into distributed neighbourhoods, the range of parameters supporting self-organised criticality widens, permitting subcritical and supercritical dynamics to occur together.

    “The hierarchical segregation of neural networks into distributed neighbourhoods has been found to stretch the parameter range for self-organised criticality by allowing subcritical and supercritical dynamics to co-exist simultaneously [75].”

    From The depressed brain: an evolutionary systems theory (2017) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. MacMahon M, 2015, Phys. Rev. X, 5, 021006 [physics
  2. Simon HA, 1962, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 106, 467
  3. Zamora-Lopez G, 2010, Front. Neuroinform., 4, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sporns, O., & Betzel, R. F.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2016-01-04
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
613-640
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2143502460
Cited by
1,334
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 53
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0903495)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation (#22002082)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Division of Graduate Education
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT009036)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
brain networks, network modules, community detection, structural connectivity, functional connectivity, graph theory, network neuroscience, brain evolution, functional specialization, complex dynamics
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Nerve Net

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review