Cited by 139Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMental Health Research TopicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Individual-specific functional connectivity of the amygdala: A substrate for precision psychiatry

Open access
Sylvester, Chad M., Yu, Qiongru, Srivastava, A. Benjamin, Marek, Scott, Zheng, Annie, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios, Smyser, Christopher D., Shimony, Joshua S. +18 more·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The amygdala is central to the pathophysiology of many psychiatric illnesses. An imprecise understanding of how the amygdala fits into the larger network organization of the human brain, however, limits our ability to create models of dysfunction in individual patients to guide personalized treatment. Therefore, we investigated the position of the amygdala and its functional subdivisions within the network organization of the brain in 10 highly sampled individuals (5 h of fMRI data per person). We characterized three functional subdivisions within the amygdala of each individual. We discovered that one subdivision is preferentially correlated with the default mode network; a second is preferentially correlated with the dorsal attention and fronto-parietal networks; and third subdivision does not have any networks to which it is preferentially correlated relative to the other two subdivisions. All three subdivisions are positively correlated with ventral attention and somatomotor networks and negatively correlated with salience and cingulo-opercular networks. These observations were replicated in an independent group dataset of 120 individuals. We also found substantial across-subject variation in the distribution and magnitude of amygdala functional connectivity with the cerebral cortex that related to individual differences in the stereotactic locations both of amygdala subdivisions and of cortical functional brain networks. Finally, using lag analyses, we found consistent temporal ordering of fMRI signals in the cortex relative to amygdala subdivisions. Altogether, this work provides a detailed framework of amygdala–cortical interactions that can be used as a foundation for models relating aberrations in amygdala connectivity to psychiatric symptoms in individual patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1910842117

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Precision brain-mapping has shown individual differences in the organization of functional networks across the cerebral cortex and in subcortical structures such as the amygdala.

    “Precision brain-mapping, which involves the collection of several hours of imaging data from individual patients, has shown individual differences in the organization of functional networks across the cerebral cortex,104–107 as well as in subcortical structures such as the amygdala.108”
  • Studies with long scan times have revealed that both task-based and resting-state brain activity measures can be obtained with high reliability and precision, allowing researchers to focus on individuals rather than groups.

    “Studies with these long scan times have revealed that both task-based and resting-state brain activity measures can be obtained with high reliability and precision, allowing researchers to focus on individuals rather than on groups.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sylvester, C. M., Yu, Q., Srivastava, A. B., Marek, S., Zheng, A., Alexopoulos, D., Smyser, C. D., Shimony, J. S., Ortega, M., Dierker, D. L., Patel, G. H., Nelson, S. M., Gilmore, A. W., McDermott, K. B., Berg, J. J., Drysdale, A. T., Perino, M. T., Snyder, A. Z., Raut, R. V., Laumann, T. O., Gordon, E. M., Barch, D. M., Rogers, C. E., Greene, D. J., Raichle, M. E., & Dosenbach, N. U. F.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Baylor University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sylvester, Chad M.
  • Raichle, Marcus E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-02-03
Volume
117
Issue
7
Pages
3808-3818
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3003190985
Cited by
139
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13
FWCI
11.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (K23MH109983, T32DA007294-26, K02NS089852, R01MH113570, R01MH113883, U54HD087011, K23MH105179, NS088590, T32MH100019, K23MH108711, T32MH018870, K01MH104592, R01MH090786, R25MH112473, P30NS098577, P01NS080675)
  • WUSTL | McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience
  • Taylor Family Institute
  • Parker Fund
  • US Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Sciences Research and Development Science (1IK2CX001680)
  • NIMH Division of Intramural Research (ZIAMH002920)
  • American Psychological Association
  • Jacobs Foundation (2016121703)
  • Child Neurology Foundation
  • Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (1140911)
  • Hope Center for Neurological Disorders
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • American Psychiatric Association
  • Leon Levy Foundation
  • National Science Foundation (DGE-1745038)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amygdala, functional connectivity, individual differences, brain network organization, default mode network, dorsal attention network, frontoparietal network, ventral attention network, sensorimotor network, salience network, cingulo-opercular network, precision psychiatry, lag analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychiatry, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review