Cited by 75Memory and Neural MechanismsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

Heterogeneity in threat extinction learning: substantive and methodological considerations for identifying individual difference in response to stress

Open access
Galatzer-Levy, Isaac R., Bonanno, George A., Bush, David E. A., LeDoux, Joseph E.·2013·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Pavlovian threat (fear) conditioning (PTC) is an experimental paradigm that couples innate aversive stimuli with neutral cues to elicit learned defensive behavior in response to the neutral cue. PTC is commonly used as a translational model to study neurobiological and behavioral aspects of fear and anxiety disorders including Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Though PTSD is a complex multi-faceted construct that cannot be fully captured in animals PTC is a conceptually valid model for studying the development and maintenance of learned threat responses. Thus, it can inform the understanding of PTSD symptomatology. However, there are significant individual differences in posttraumatic stress that are not as of yet accounted for in studies of PTC. Individuals exposed to danger have been shown to follow distinct patterns: some adapt rapidly and completely (resilience) others adapt slowly (recovery) and others failure to adapt (chronic stress response). Identifying similar behavioral outcomes in PTC increases the translatability of this model. In this report we present a flexible methodology for identifying individual differences in PTC by modeling latent subpopulations or classes characterized by defensive behavior during training. We provide evidence from a reanalysis of previously examined PTC learning and extinction data in rats to demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology in identifying outcomes analogous to those observed in humans exposed to threat. By utilizing Latent Class Growth Analysis (LCGA) to test for heterogeneity in freezing behavior during threat conditioning and extinction learning in adult male outbred rats (n = 58) three outcomes were identified: rapid extinction (57.3%), slow extinction (32.3%), and failure to extinguish (10.3%) indicating that heterogeneity analogous to that in naturalistic human studies is present in experimental animal studies strengthening their translatability in understanding stress responses in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00055

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Galatzer-Levy I. R. Madan A. Neylan T. C. Henn-Haase C. Marmar C. R. (2011c). Peritraumatic and trait dissociation differentiate police officers with resilient versus symptomatic trajectories of posttraumatic stress symptoms. J. Trauma. Stress 24, 557– 565 10.1002/jts.20684 21898602 PMC3974926 · DOI · Paper page
  2. McAllister W. R. McAllister D. E. (1971). Behavioral measurement of condtioned fear, in Aversive Conditioning and Learning, ed Brush F. R. (New York, NY: Academic Press), 105– 179

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galatzer-Levy, I. R., Bonanno, G. A., Bush, D. E. A., & LeDoux, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
55-55
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061214701
Cited by
75
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH046516)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
fear extinction, individual differences, latent class growth analysis, freezing behavior, post-traumatic stress disorder, resilience, translational model, rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review