Cited by 87Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesGame Theory and Applications

Caring for the future can turn tragedy into comedy for long-term collective action under risk of collapse

Open access
Barfuss, Wolfram, Donges, Jonathan F., Vasconcelos, Vítor V., Kurths, Jürgen, Levin, Simon A.·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We will need collective action to avoid catastrophic climate change, and this will require valuing the long term as well as the short term. Shortsightedness and uncertainty have hindered progress in resolving this collective action problem and have been recognized as important barriers to cooperation among humans. Here, we propose a coupled social–ecological dilemma to investigate the interdependence of three well-identified components of this cooperation problem: 1) timescales of collapse and recovery in relation to time preferences regarding future outcomes, 2) the magnitude of the impact of collapse, and 3) the number of actors in the collective. We find that, under a sufficiently severe and time-distant collapse, how much the actors care for the future can transform the game from a tragedy of the commons into one of coordination, and even into a comedy of the commons in which cooperation dominates. Conversely, we also find conditions under which even strong concern for the future still does not transform the problem from tragedy to comedy. For a large number of participating actors, we find that the critical collapse impact, at which these game regime changes happen, converges to a fixed value of collapse impact per actor that is independent of the enhancement factor of the public good, which is usually regarded as the driver of the dilemma. Our results not only call for experimental testing but also help explain why polarization in beliefs about human-caused climate change can threaten global cooperation agreements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1916545117

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simply caring more for future rewards in sequential social dilemmas or certain 'intrinsic motivations' in MARL - such as inequity aversion, social influence, or inefficiency penalties - have been shown to improve cooperation in sequential social dilemmas.

    “simply caring more for future rewards in sequential social dilemmas (Barfuss et al., 2020) or certain 'intrinsic motivations' in MARL - such as inequity aversion (Hughes et al., 2018), social influence (Jaques et al., 2019), or inefficiency penalties (Gemp et al., 2022) - have been shown to improve cooperation in sequential social dilemmas (Leibo et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019a).”

    From Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI (2025) · cites this paper as Barfuss et al., 2020

  • Human collective dynamics are critical to the wellbeing of people and ecosystems in the present and will set the stage for how we face global challenges with impacts that will last centuries.

    “Human collective dynamics are critical to the wellbeing of people and ecosystems in the present and will set the stage for how we face global challenges with impacts that will last centuries (14, 15, 64).”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [64]

  • Conservation biology adopts the approach of identifying common classes of problems and associated solutions, where crises observed across multiple contexts lead to an understanding of multiscaled dynamics yielding solutions that can be tailored to given sociological and ecological contexts.

    “This is the approach adopted in conservation biology, where crises observed across multiple contexts (e.g., ecosystem collapse, mismanaged commons) lead to an understanding of multiscaled dynamics yielding solutions that can be tailored to given sociological and ecological contexts (8, 47, 64).”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [64]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [9]Hardin G., The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [32]Fudenberg D., Tirole J., Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991). [Google Scholar]
  3. [60]Hardin G. J., The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barfuss, W., Donges, J. F., Vasconcelos, V. V., Kurths, J., & Levin, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Association (DE)
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Saratov State University (RU)
Corresponding author
  • Barfuss, Wolfram
  • Levin, Simon A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-05-20
Volume
117
Issue
23
Pages
12915-12922
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3028473954
Cited by
87
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
17.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Heinrich Böll Stiftung (Scholarship)
  • European Research Council (advanced grant project ERA (Earth Resilience in the Anthropocene))
  • Earth League (EarthDoc program)
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft (project DOMINOES)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
tragedy of the commons, collective action, climate change mitigation, long-term thinking, time preference, collapse risk, social-ecological systems, game theory, public goods, tipping points, international cooperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review