Cited by 610Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingSignaling Pathways in Disease

Biochemical and immunochemical evidence that the "major postsynaptic density protein" is a subunit of a calmodulin-dependent protein kinase.

Open access
Kennedy, M B, Bennett, M K, Erondu, N E·1983·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

By three criteria, two biochemical and one immunochemical, the major postsynaptic density protein (mPSDp) is indistinguishable from the 50-kilodalton (kDa) alpha subunit of a brain calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. First, the two proteins comigrate on NaDodSO4/polyacrylamide gels. Second, iodinated tryptic peptide maps of the two are identical. Finally, a monoclonal antibody (6G9) that was raised against the protein kinase binds on immunoblots to a single 50 kDa band in crude brain homogenates and to both the alpha subunit of the purified kinase and the mPSDp from postsynaptic density fractions. The purified kinase holoenzyme also contains a 60-kDa subunit termed beta. A comparison of the peptide map of beta with the maps of 60-kDa proteins from the postsynaptic density fraction suggests that beta is present there but is not the only protein present in this molecular weight range. These results indicate that the calmodulin-dependent protein kinase is a major constituent of the postsynaptic density fraction and thus may be a component of type I postsynaptic densities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.80.23.7357

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CaMKII is present in the brain at extraordinarily high levels, rivaling the levels of cytoskeletal proteins.

    “Second, it is present in the brain at extraordinarily high levels, rivaling the levels of cytoskeletal proteins (63–67), suggesting that CaMKII may play a structural role (27, 68).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [67]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, M. B., Bennett, M. K., & Erondu, N. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1983-12
Volume
80
Issue
23
Pages
7357-7361
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2061893190
Cited by
610
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
Keywords
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, postsynaptic density, peptide mapping
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Hybridomas, Molecular Weight, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Peptide Fragments, Protein Kinases, Synaptic Membranes, Trypsin, Macromolecular Substances, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review