Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disruption of either the E1 or the E2 regulatory gene of human papillomavirus type 16 increases viral immortalization capacity.

Open access
Romanczuk, H, Howley, P M·1992·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The "high-risk" human papillomavirus types 16 (HPV-16) and 18 (HPV-18) have been etiologically implicated in the majority of human cervical carcinomas. In these cancers, the viral DNAs are often integrated into the host genome so that expression of the E1 and the E2 genes is lost, suggesting that disruption of these regulatory genes plays an important role in carcinogenic progression. Previous studies defining the viral genes affecting HPV-16 transformation functions have used the "prototype" viral genome, which was cloned from a human cervical carcinoma and later discovered to harbor a mutation in the E1 gene. In this study, we have corrected this mutation and have evaluated the effect of mutations of either the E1 or the E2 gene on the efficiency of HPV-16 immortalization of human keratinocytes. Mutation of either the E1 gene or the E2 gene in the background of a "wild-type" HPV-16 genome markedly increased immortalization capacity. Mutations were also generated in the E2-binding sites located upstream of the P97 promoter, which directs synthesis of the viral E6 and E7 transforming genes. E2 negatively regulates the P97 promoter through binding at adjacent sites. Surprisingly, the mutation of these sites only partially relieved the negative effect of E2 on viral immortalization, implicating additional mechanisms in the E2 repression of viral immortalization functions. Our results provide genetic evidence that the E1 and E2 gene products each can repress HPV-16 immortalization and support the hypothesis that a selective growth advantage is provided by integration of the viral genome in a manner that causes the loss of expression of either E1 or E2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.89.7.3159

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Romanczuk, H., & Howley, P. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1992-04
Volume
89
Issue
7
Pages
3159-3163
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2022305813
Cited by
318
References
36
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disruption of either the E1 or the E2 regulatory gene of human papillomavirus type 16 increases viral immortalization capacity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.7.3159
The paper
Romanczuk, H., & Howley, P. M. (1992). Disruption of either the E1 or the E2 regulatory gene of human papillomavirus type 16 increases viral immortalization capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.7.3159

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.