The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention.
Open accessAbstract
Neuromagnetic fields were recorded from human subjects as they listened selectively to sequences of rapidly presented tones in one ear while ignoring tones of a different pitch in the opposite ear. Tones in the attended ear evoked larger magnetic brain responses than did unattended tones in the latency ranges 20-50 msec and 80-130 msec poststimulus. Source localization techniques in conjunction with magnetic resonance imaging placed the neural generators of these early attention-sensitive brain responses in auditory cortex on the supratemporal plane. These data demonstrate that focused auditory attention in humans can selectively modulate sensory processing in auditory cortex beginning as early as 20 msec poststimulus, thereby providing strong evidence for an "early selection" mechanism of auditory attention that can regulate auditory input at or before the initial stages of cortical analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070
Cited by
The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention
Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1727 · Cited by 1,566
Self-citationThe mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms
Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029 · Cited by 1,441
“Secondly, adaptation does not explain why an MMN can be elicited in the absence of a N1 response, for example, during sleep (Atienza and Cantero, 2001) or when unexpectedly omitting a stimulus (Yabe et al., 1997).”
BackgroundA taxonomy of external and internal attention.
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427 · Cited by 1,472
Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”
Zion Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., Goodman, R. R., Emerson, R., Mehta, A. D., Simon, J. Z., et al. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.037 · Cited by 909
Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained
May, P. J. C., & Tiitinen, H. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00856.x · Cited by 549
Rehabilitation of brain damage: Brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery.
Robertson, I. H., & Murre, J. M. J. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.544 · Cited by 507
Talsma, D., Doty, T. J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk016 · Cited by 434
Self-citationThe attentional requirements of consciousness
Cohen, M. A., Cavanagh, P., Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.013 · Cited by 370
Functional anatomy of human auditory attention studied with PET
Tzourio, N., El Massioui, F., Crivello, F., Joliot, M., Renault, B., & Mazoyer, B. (1997) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1996.0252 · Cited by 212
Neural correlates of auditory perceptual awareness under informational masking
Gutschalk, A., Micheyl, C., & Oxenham, A. J. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060138 · Cited by 201
Listening in Silence Activates Auditory Areas: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Voisin, J., Bidet-Caulet, A., Bertrand, O., & Fonlupt, P. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2967-05.2006 · Cited by 170
Functional anatomy of arousal and attention systems in the human brain
(2000) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(00)26007-x · Cited by 133
(2000) · Cited by 113
Kenemans, J. L., & Kähkönen, S. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.157 · Cited by 104
The role of the primary auditory cortex in the neural mechanism of auditory verbal hallucinations
Kompus, K., Falkenberg, L. E., Bless, J. J., Johnsen, E., Kroken, R. A., Kråkvik, B., Larøi, F., Løberg, E.-M., Vedul-Kjelsås, E., Westerhausen, R., et al. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00144 · Cited by 91
Cognitive Abilities and 50- and 100-msec Paired-Click Processes in Schizophrenia
Smith, A. K., Edgar, J. C., Huang, M., Lu, B. Y., Thoma, R. J., Hanlon, F. M., McHaffie, G., Jones, A. P., Paz, R. D., Miller, G. A., et al. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09071059 · Cited by 88
Multisensory Integration Develops Late in Humans
Burr, D., & Gori, M. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.1201/9781439812174-23 · Cited by 82
Expectation violation and attention to pain jointly modulate neural gain in somatosensory cortex
Fardo, F., Auksztulewicz, R., Allen, M., Dietz, M. J., Roepstorff, A., & Friston, K. J. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.041 · Cited by 59
Sustained attention and apical dendrite activity in recurrent circuits.
LaBerge, D. (2005) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.004 · Cited by 49
Does the mismatch negativity operate on a consciously accessible memory trace?
Dykstra, A. R., & Gutschalk, A. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500677 · Cited by 42
“Finally, in addition to P1, masker tones also elicited a small but reliable N1, which is generally much more sensitive to attention than P1 (14).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Woldorff, M. G., Gallen, C. C., Hampson, S. A., Hillyard, S. A., Pantev, C., Sobel, D., & Bloom, F. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1993-09-15
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 8722-8726
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2065169231
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
