Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells

Open access
Cho, Bryan K., Wang, Changyu, Sugawa, Satoshi, Eisen, Herman N., Chen, Jianzhu·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

To determine how murine memory and naive T cells differ, we generated large numbers of long-lived memory CD8+T cells and compared them to naive cells expressing the same antigen-specific receptor (T cell receptor; TCR). Although both populations expressed similar levels of TCR and CD8, on antigen stimulation in vitro memory T cells down-regulated their TCR faster and more extensively and secreted IFN-γ and IL-2 faster than naive T cells. Memory cells were also larger, and when freshly isolated from mice they contained perforin and killed target cells without having to be restimulated. They further differed from naive cells in requiring IL-15 for proliferation and in having a greater tendency to undergo apoptosis in vitro. On antigen stimulation in vivo, however, they proliferated more rapidly than naive cells. These findings suggest that, unlike naive T cells, CD8 memory T cells are intrinsically programmed to rapidly express their effector functions in vivo without having to undergo clonal expansion and differentiation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2976

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.333 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0952-7915(97)80084-2 · DOI
  3. H N Eisen Harvey Lect 60, 1–34 (1966).
  4. 10.1084/jem.126.6.1185 · doi:10.1084/jem.126.6.1185
  5. 10.1146/annurev.iy.07.040189.002541 · doi:10.1146/annurev.iy.07.040189.002541 · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/2281045a0 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/312271a0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/381751a0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/1074-7613(94)90044-2 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/369652a0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/369648a0 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1126/science.8073282 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90077-2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1126/science.7535476 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1084/jem.184.6.2141 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1084/jem.183.4.1367 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1126/science.276.5321.2057 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1084/jem.186.6.859 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3065 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/1074-7613(94)90084-1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1073/pnas.81.2.573 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/335271a0 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11487 · DOI · Paper page
  24. K Udaka, K H Wiesmuller, S Kienle, G Jung, P Walden J Immunol 157, 670–678 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/intimm/2.7.677 · doi:10.1093/intimm/2.7.677
  26. 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00072-I · DOI · Paper page
  27. R M Kedl, M F Mescher J Immunol 161, 674–683 (1998). · DOI
  28. P R Walker, T Ohteki, J A Lopez, H R MacDonald, J L Maryanski J Immunol 155, 3443–3452 (1995). · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.273.5271.104 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80470-7 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/S0952-7915(97)80081-7 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80563-4 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80564-6 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00257.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00257.x

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Cho, B. K., Wang, C., Sugawa, S., Eisen, H. N., & Chen, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-03-16
Volume
96
Issue
6
Pages
2976-2981
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2008750159
Cited by
216
References
2
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.6.2976
The paper
Cho, B. K., Wang, C., Sugawa, S., Eisen, H. N., & Chen, J. (1999). Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.6.2976

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.