Cited by 1,044Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prenatal stress produces learning deficits associated with an inhibition of neurogenesis in the hippocampus

Open access
Lemaire, V., Koehl, M., Le Moal, M., Abrous, D. N.·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Early experiences such as prenatal stress significantly influence the development of the brain and the organization of behavior. In particular, prenatal stress impairs memory processes but the mechanism for this effect is not known. Hippocampal granule neurons are generated throughout life and are involved in hippocampal-dependent learning. Here, we report that prenatal stress in rats induced lifespan reduction of neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus and produced impairment in hippocampal-related spatial tasks. Prenatal stress blocked the increase of learning-induced neurogenesis. These data strengthen pathophysiological hypotheses that propose an early neurodevelopmental origin for psychopathological vulnerabilities in aging.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.97.20.11032

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. B B Stanfield, J E Trice Exp Brain Res 72, 399–406 (1988).
  2. E Gould, H A Cameron, D C Daniels, C S Woolley, B S McEwen J Neuroci 12, 3642–3650 (1992).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,044

Metadata

Authors
Lemaire, V., Koehl, M., Le Moal, M., & Abrous, D. N.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Laboratoire de Psychobiologie des Comportement Adaptatifs, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 259, Université de Bordeaux II, Domaine de Carreire, Rue Camille Saint Saëns, 33077 Bordeaux Cedex, France
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-09-26
Volume
97
Issue
20
Pages
11032-11037
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2142525943
Cited by
1,044
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 48
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
prenatal stress, hippocampal neurogenesis, dentate gyrus, learning deficits, spatial learning, hippocampal-dependent memory, brain development, aging, psychopathology
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Female, Hippocampus, Learning Disabilities, Neurons, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review