CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

β-Amyloid Stimulation of Inducible Nitric-oxide Synthase in Astrocytes Is Interleukin-1β- and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNFα)-dependent, and Involves a TNFα Receptor-associated Factor- and NFκB-inducing Kinase-dependent Signaling Mechanism

Akama, Keith T., Van Eldik, Linda J.·2000·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7918
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7918

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sustained elevations of IL-1β have been postulated to play a key role in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis.

    “Sustained elevations of IL-1β have been postulated to play a key role in AD pathogenesis [6, 12–14].”

    From 25-Hydroxycholesterol amplifies microglial IL-1β production in an apoE isoform-dependent manner (2020) · cites this paper as [6]

    The introductory passage calls IL-1β a critical inflammatory cytokine in AD and says increased numbers of IL-1β-expressing microglia are associated with AD progression. The Discussion proposes a pathway by which IL-1β contributes to neurodegeneration, but neither passage establishes that IL-1β elevations are sustained. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Mrak, 1995, Hum. Pathol., 26, 816, 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90001-2 · DOI
  2. Chao, 1996, J. Neurovirol., 2, 234, 10.3109/13550289609146886 · DOI
  3. Pasinetti, 1996, Neurobiol. Aging, 17, 707, 10.1016/0197-4580(96)00113-3 · DOI
  4. Aschner, 1999, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 39, 151, 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.39.1.151 · DOI
  5. Murphy, 1998, Gen. Pharmacol., 31, 179, 10.1016/S0306-3623(97)00418-7 · DOI
  6. Lee, 1996, Methods, 10, 31, 10.1006/meth.1996.0075 · DOI
  7. Weldon, 1997, Geriatrics, 52 Suppl. 2, S13
  8. Wallace, 1997, Exp. Neurol., 144, 266, 10.1006/exnr.1996.6373 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Smith, 1997, J. Neurosci., 17, 2653, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-08-02653.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Koppal, 1999, J. Neurochem., 72, 310, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0720310.x · DOI
  11. Rossi, 1996, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 225, 474, 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1197 · DOI
  12. Hu, 1998, Brain Res., 785, 195, 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01318-8 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Murphy, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 20967, 10.1074/jbc.273.33.20967 · DOI
  14. Hu, 1997, J. Neurochem., 69, 2294, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69062294.x · DOI
  15. Akama, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 5795, 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5795 · DOI
  16. Araujo, 1992, Brain Res., 569, 141, 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90380-R · DOI
  17. Chao, 1994, Mol. Chem. Neuropathol., 23, 159, 10.1007/BF02815409 · DOI
  18. Chao, 1998, Alzheimers Dis. Rev., 3, 87
  19. Lee, 1993, J. Neuroimmunol., 46, 19, 10.1016/0165-5728(93)90229-R · DOI
  20. Chao, 1995, Brain Behav. Immun., 9, 355, 10.1006/brbi.1995.1033 · DOI
  21. Sheng, 1998, Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol., 24, 278, 10.1046/j.1365-2990.1998.00122.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Blom, 1997, Brain Res., 777, 210, 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01204-3 · DOI
  23. Fiebich, 1998, J. Neural Transm. Suppl., 54, 268
  24. Griffin, 1998, Brain Pathol., 8, 65, 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00136.x · DOI
  25. Cao, 1996, Nature, 383, 443, 10.1038/383443a0 · DOI
  26. Song, 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 94, 9792, 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9792 · DOI
  27. Baeuerle, 1998, Curr. Biol., 8, R19, 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70010-7 · DOI
  28. Arch, 1998, Genes Dev., 12, 2821, 10.1101/gad.12.18.2821 · DOI
  29. Awane, 1999, J. Immunol., 162, 5337, 10.4049/jimmunol.162.9.5337 · DOI
  30. Ninomiya-Tsuji, 1999, Nature, 398, 252, 10.1038/18465 · DOI
  31. Karin, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 9067, 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9067 · DOI
  32. Lin, 1998, Mol. Cell. Biol., 18, 5899, 10.1128/MCB.18.10.5899 · DOI
  33. Terai, 1996, Brain Res., 739, 343, 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01073-6 · DOI
  34. Kaltschmidt, 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 94, 2642, 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2642 · DOI
  35. deVera, 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 1054, 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1054 · DOI
  36. Ishida, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 28745, 10.1074/jbc.271.46.28745 · DOI
  37. Natoli, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 26079, 10.1074/jbc.272.42.26079 · DOI
  38. Petrova, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 4668, 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4668 · DOI
  39. Kunz, 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 91, 5387, 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5387 · DOI
  40. Eberhardt, 1998, J. Immunol., 160, 4961, 10.4049/jimmunol.160.10.4961 · DOI
  41. Zhang, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 7611, 10.1074/jbc.274.12.7611 · DOI
  42. Jobin, 1999, J. Immunol., 162, 4447, 10.4049/jimmunol.162.8.4447 · DOI
  43. Malinin, 1997, Nature, 385, 540, 10.1038/385540a0 · DOI
  44. Schielke, 1998, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 18, 180, 10.1097/00004647-199802000-00009 · DOI
  45. Friedlander, 1997, J. Exp. Med., 185, 933, 10.1084/jem.185.5.933 · DOI
  46. Yang, 1997, Brain Res., 751, 181, 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01277-2 · DOI
  47. Forstermann, 1995, Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol., 352, 351, 10.1007/BF00172772 · DOI
  48. Geller, 1998, Cancer Metastasis Rev., 17, 7, 10.1023/A:1005940202801 · DOI
  49. Brosnan, 1997, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 25, 679, 10.1042/bst0250679 · DOI
  50. Iadecola, 1997, J. Neurosci., 17, 9157, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-23-09157.1997 · DOI
  51. Casado, 1997, Biochem. J., 327, 819, 10.1042/bj3270819 · DOI
  52. Liu, 1996, J. Immunol., 157, 3569, 10.4049/jimmunol.157.8.3569 · DOI
  53. Da Silva, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 28373, 10.1074/jbc.272.45.28373 · DOI
  54. Baldassare, 1999, J. Immunol., 162, 5367, 10.4049/jimmunol.162.9.5367 · DOI
  55. Hensley, 1999, J. Neurochem., 72, 2053, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0722053.x · DOI · Paper page
  56. McDonald, 1998, J. Neurosci., 18, 4451, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-12-04451.1998 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akama, K. T., & Van Eldik, L. J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
275
Issue
11
Pages
7918-7924
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.275.11.7918
Cited by
287
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review