CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 128

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Proteolytic Processing of Angiopoietin-like Protein 4 by Proprotein Convertases Modulates Its Inhibitory Effects on Lipoprotein Lipase Activity

Lei, Xia, Shi, Fujun, Basu, Debapriya, Huq, Afroza, Routhier, Sophie, Day, Robert, Jin, Weijun·2011·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m110.217638
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m110.217638

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The N-terminal region of ANGPTL4 is necessary and sufficient for LPL inhibition, and once cleaved from the fibrinogen-like domain, it inhibits LPL more efficiently than full-length ANGPTL4.

    “Several studies have shown that not only is the N-terminal region of ANGPTL4 necessary and sufficient for LPL inhibition, but also that, once cleaved from the fibrinogen-like domain, the N-terminal region inhibits LPL more efficiently than full-length ANGPTL4 (49, 51, 72, 89, 90).”

    From Regulation of lipoprotein metabolism by ANGPTL3, ANGPTL4, and ANGPTL8 (2021) · cites this paper as [90]

  • Proteolytic cleavage is known to increase the ability of ANGPTL4 to inhibit LPL.

    “As proteolytic cleavage is known to increase the ability of ANGPTL4 to inhibit LPL (51, 89, 90),”

    From Regulation of lipoprotein metabolism by ANGPTL3, ANGPTL4, and ANGPTL8 (2021) · cites this paper as [90]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Folsom, 2008, Metabolism, 57, 1591, 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.06.016 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Adachi, 2009, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 379, 806, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.018 · DOI
  3. Welm, 2008, Cell, 133, 27, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.012 · DOI
  4. Bäckhed, 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101, 15718, 10.1073/pnas.0407076101 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Xu, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102, 6086, 10.1073/pnas.0408452102 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Goh, 2010, J. Biol. Chem., 285, 32999, 10.1074/jbc.M110.108175 · DOI
  7. Goh, 2010, Am. J. Pathol., 177, 2791, 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100129 · DOI
  8. Lichtenstein, 2010, Cell Metab., 12, 580, 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hermann, 2005, Clin. Immunol., 115, 93, 10.1016/j.clim.2004.12.002 · DOI
  10. Miida, 2010, Curr. Opin. Lipidol., 21, 70, 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328333269e · DOI
  11. Sukonina, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 103, 17450, 10.1073/pnas.0604026103 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Cazes, 2006, Circ. Res., 99, 1207, 10.1161/01.RES.0000250758.63358.91 · DOI
  13. Ge, 2004, J. Lipid Res., 45, 2071, 10.1194/jlr.M400138-JLR200 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Mandard, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 34411, 10.1074/jbc.M403058200 · DOI
  15. Yin, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 13213, 10.1074/jbc.M900553200 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Chomel, 2009, FASEB J., 23, 940, 10.1096/fj.08-115170 · DOI
  17. Fugère, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 7648, 10.1074/jbc.M107467200 · DOI
  18. Jin, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 36551, 10.1074/jbc.M502264200 · DOI
  19. Jin, 2007, Cell Metab., 6, 129, 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Jin, 2003, Circ. Res., 92, 644, 10.1161/01.RES.0000064502.47539.6D · DOI
  21. McCoy, 2002, J. Lipid Res., 43, 921, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)30466-1 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ge, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 2038, 10.1074/jbc.M307583200 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Yang, 2008, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 28, 835, 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.157776 · DOI
  24. Li, 2007, Biochem. J., 406, 203, 10.1042/BJ20070664 · DOI
  25. Nour, 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 5215, 10.1091/mbc.e05-06-0504 · DOI
  26. Liu, 2010, J. Biol. Chem., 285, 27561, 10.1074/jbc.M110.144279 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Schjoldager, 2010, J. Biol. Chem., 285, 36293, 10.1074/jbc.M110.156950 · DOI
  28. Shan, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 1419, 10.1074/jbc.M808477200 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Li, 2009, Curr. Opin. Lipidol., 20, 357, 10.1097/MOL.0b013e32832dd55a · DOI
  30. Mandard, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 934, 10.1074/jbc.M506519200 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Desai, 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 11766, 10.1073/pnas.0705041104 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lei, X., Shi, F., Basu, D., Huq, A., Routhier, S., Day, R., & Jin, W.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
286
Issue
18
Pages
15747-15756
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.m110.217638
Cited by
128
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review