Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Angiopoietin-like protein 4 decreases blood glucose and improves glucose tolerance but induces hyperlipidemia and hepatic steatosis in mice

Xu, Aimin, Lam, Michael C., Chan, Kok Weng, Wang, Yu, Zhang, Jialiang, Hoo, Ruby L. C., Xu, Jian Yu, Chen, Baoying, Chow, Wing-Sun, Tso, Annette W. K., Lam, Karen S. L.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) is a circulating protein predominantly expressed in adipose tissue and liver. Several recent studies demonstrated that ANGPTL4 is the target gene of peroxisome proliferation activators, the agonists of which are widely used as the antidiabetic and lipid-lowering drugs. Here we provide evidence that ANGPTL4 is a blood-borne hormone directly involved in regulating glucose homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity. Adenovirus-mediated expression of ANGPTL4 potently decreased blood glucose and improved glucose tolerance, whereas it induced hyperlipidemia, fatty liver, and hepatomegaly in C57 mice. In db/db diabetic mice, ANGPTL4 treatment reduced hyperglycemia to a normal level, and markedly alleviated glucose intolerance and hyperinsulinemia. Ex vivo studies on primary rat hepatocytes revealed that ANGPTL4 significantly decreased hepatic glucose production and enhanced insulin-mediated inhibition of gluconeogenesis. Serum levels of ANGPTL4 in human subjects inversely correlated with plasma glucose concentrations and HOMA IR, the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. In patients with type 2 diabetes, serum levels of ANGPTL4 were significantly lower than those in healthy subjects, suggesting that the decreased ANGPTL4 could be a causative factor of this disease. These results collectively indicate that ANGPTL4 exerts distinct effects on glucose and lipid metabolism, and that its beneficial effect on glucose homeostasis might be useful for the treatment of diabetes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0408452102

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1210/jc.2004-0395 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000099786.99623.EF · DOI
  3. 10.1128/MCB.20.14.5343-5349.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1074/jbc.M004029200 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1042/bj3460603 · DOI
  6. 10.1074/jbc.M403058200 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1194/jlr.C200010-JLR200 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1194/jlr.M400138-JLR200 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801834 · DOI
  10. 10.1074/jbc.M208756200 · DOI
  11. 10.1210/en.2003-1140 · DOI
  12. Keppler, D. & Decker, K. (1974) in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, ed. Bergmeyer, N. U. (VCH, Weinheim, Germany), Vol. 6, pp. 2225-2228.
  13. 10.1074/jbc.M200601200 · DOI
  14. 10.1074/jbc.274.10.6718 · DOI
  15. 10.1210/endo.137.10.8828476 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1210/en.2003-0288 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)90002-3 · DOI
  18. 10.2337/diabetes.52.12.2905 · DOI
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M307583200 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1073/pnas.98.4.2005 · DOI
  21. 10.1074/jbc.M309469200 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xu, A., Lam, M. C., Chan, K. W., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Hoo, R. L. C., Xu, J. Y., Chen, B., Chow, W.-S., Tso, A. W. K., & Lam, K. S. L.
Affiliations
Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry, Research Center of Heart, Brain, Hormone, and Healthy Aging, and Genome Research Center, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-04-18
Volume
102
Issue
17
Pages
6086-6091
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
269
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review