Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amyloid-β Binds to the Extracellular Cysteine-rich Domain of Frizzled and Inhibits Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling

Magdesian, Margaret H., Carvalho, Milena M. V.F., Mendes, Fabio A., Saraiva, Leonardo M., Juliano, Maria A., Juliano, Luiz, Garcia-Abreu, José, Ferreira, Sérgio T.·2008·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m707108200

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the progression of Alzheimer's disease, the β-amyloid protein can bind to the Frizzled receptor inhibiting downstream phosphorylation and preventing canonical Wnt signalling induction.

    “During the progression of Alzheimer's disease, the β-amyloid protein can bind to the Frizzled receptor inhibiting downstream phosphorylation and preventing canonical Wnt signalling induction.16”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Klein, 2006, Alzheimer′s Dementia, 260
  2. Ferreira, 2007, IUBMB Life, 59, 332, 10.1080/15216540701283882 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Inestrosa, 2007, IUBMB Life, 59, 316, 10.1080/15216540701242490 · DOI
  4. Dann, 2001, Nature, 412, 86, 10.1038/35083601 · DOI
  5. Patapoutian, 2000, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 10, 392, 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00100-8 · DOI
  6. Lie, 2005, Nature, 437, 1370, 10.1038/nature04108 · DOI
  7. Speese, 2007, Trends Neurosci., 30, 268, 10.1016/j.tins.2007.04.003 · DOI
  8. Tamai, 2000, Nature, 407, 530, 10.1038/35035117 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Aberle, 1997, EMBO J., 16, 3797, 10.1093/emboj/16.13.3797 · DOI
  10. Salomon, 1997, J. Cell Biol., 139, 1325, 10.1083/jcb.139.5.1325 · DOI
  11. He, 2004, Development, 131, 1663, 10.1242/dev.01117 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Luo, 2004, Neurosignals, 13, 99, 10.1159/000076563 · DOI
  13. Nelson, 2004, Science, 303, 1483, 10.1126/science.1094291 · DOI
  14. De Ferrari, 2000, Brain Res. Rev., 33, 1, 10.1016/S0165-0173(00)00021-7 · DOI
  15. Mudher, 2002, Trends Neurosci., 25, 22, 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)02031-2 · DOI
  16. Caricasole, 2003, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 24, 233, 10.1016/S0165-6147(03)00100-7 · DOI
  17. Salins, 2007, Neuroscience Lett., 412, 211, 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.045 · DOI
  18. Levesque, 1999, J. Neurochem., 72, 999, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0720999.x · DOI
  19. Palacino, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 38563, 10.1074/jbc.M105376200 · DOI
  20. Garrido, 2002, FASEB J., 14, 1982, 10.1096/fj.02-0327fje · DOI
  21. Baum, 1996, Mol. Chem. Neuropathol., 29, 253, 10.1007/BF02815006 · DOI
  22. Alvarez, 2004, Exp. Cell Res., 297, 186, 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.02.028 · DOI
  23. Altschul, 1997, Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389, 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lima, 2004, Protein J., 23, 287, 10.1023/B:JOPC.0000027853.93513.34 · DOI
  25. Wigler, 1978, Cell, 14, 725, 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90254-4 · DOI
  26. Magdesian, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 19382, 10.1074/jbc.M011474200 · DOI
  27. Golan, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 14879, 10.1074/jbc.M306421200 · DOI
  28. De Felice, 2007, Neurobiol. Aging
  29. Kang, 2003, Neurobiol. Dis., 14, 146, 10.1016/S0969-9961(03)00105-0 · DOI
  30. Orner, 2006, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128, 11882, 10.1021/ja0619861 · DOI
  31. Fradkin, 2005, J. Neurosci., 25, 10376, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3429-05.2005 · DOI
  32. Chen, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 11910, 10.1074/jbc.M511920200 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Hsieh, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 3546, 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3546 · DOI
  34. Caricasole, 2004, J. Neurosci., 24, 6021, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1381-04.2004 · DOI
  35. Bhat, 2002, Neurosignals, 11, 251, 10.1159/000067423 · DOI
  36. Nishimura, 1999, Nat. Med., 5, 164, 10.1038/5526 · DOI
  37. Fuentealba, 2004, Brain Res. Rev., 47, 275, 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.07.018 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Magdesian, M. H., Carvalho, M. M. V. F., Mendes, F. A., Saraiva, L. M., Juliano, M. A., Juliano, L., Garcia-Abreu, J., & Ferreira, S. T.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
283
Issue
14
Pages
9359-9368
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
221
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review