Cited by 91Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics

Household food wastage in Britain

Open access
Wenlock, R. W., Buss, D. H., Derry, B. J., Dixon, E. J.·1980·British Journal Of Nutrition

Abstract

1. The total food and drink available for human consumption in the United Kingdom would provide approximately 13 MJ (3100 kcal)/person per d, while the energy intake recommended for the population is approximately 9.6 MJ (2300 kcal)/person per d. A proportion of this substantial difference must be due to wastage in the home as well as in catering establishments and during the storage, distribution and processing of food. 2. As part of a general investigation of this problem, a representative sample of 100 British households was asked to collect all the potentially-edible food wasted in their homes during 1 week, and to keep a record of the food, other than commercial pet food, which they gave to pets and wild birds. A total of 672 households co-operated fully, 338 in summer and 334 in winter. Each food sample received was weighed, and its energy content was determined calorimetrically. 3. Significantly more waste food was collected in summer than in winter, equivalent to 9.3 MJ (2220 kcal)/household per week and 7.1 MJ (1700 kcal)/household per week respectively. In terms of energy, cereals, fat and meat wastage predominated, while in terms of weight, milk was more important and fat less so. 4. Considerable quantities of otherwise edible food were also given to pets and birds, accounting on average for a further 2.4 MJ (570 kcal) and 3.0 MJ (710 kcal)/household per week in summer and winter respectively. The energy content of all food wasted in the home therefore averaged 11.7 MJ (2790 kcal)/household per week in summer and 10.1 MJ (2410 kcal)/households per week in winter, equivalent to 0.6 MJ (150 kcal) and 0.5 MJ (130 kcal)/person per d respectively. This is less than one-quarter of the gap between food supplies and the amount of food thought to be eaten in the UK. 5. Food wastage was significantly influenced by the composition of the family, with adults wasting more in absolute terms than children, and larger households wasting less per person than smaller households. However, with few exceptions, neither income nor geographical region significantly affected the total amount of food wasted in the home. 6. When assessed against the expected usage of food in the home, wastage accounted on average for 6.5% of the energy intake in summer and 5.4% in winter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn19800064

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies find no correlation between income and food waste.

    “Other studies, however, find no correlation between income and food waste (Koivupuro et al., 2012;Visschers et al., 2016;Wenlock et al., 1980)”

    From Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications (2018) · cites this paper as Wenlock et al., 1980

    In “Influence of income on wastage” (p. 53), the paper says the relationship was not formally significant after adjustment for household size and region. But it also reports a clear summer relationship, and the Conclusions (p. 53) say wastage tended to increase with income. “No correlation” overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Considerable amounts of food waste are given to pets.

    “Considerable amounts of food waste are given to pets (Wenlock et al., 1980).”
  • Others found little or no correlation between income and food wastage.

    “However, others found little or no correlation between income and food wastage (Koivupuro et al. 2012, Van Garde and Woodburn 1987, Wenlock et al. 1980).”

    From Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development (2016) · cites this paper as Wenlock et al. 1980

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Goldberger, A. S. (1974). Econometric Theory, p. 218. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1978b). Trode and Industry 32, 746. Institution. no. CED-77-118. Washington, DC: General Accounting office. Office. and 1976. London: H.M. Stationery O f f i c e . London: H.M. Stationery O f f i c e . https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19800064 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wenlock, R. W., Buss, D. H., Derry, B. J., & Dixon, E. J.
Venue
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
1980-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
53-70
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2098316181
Cited by
91
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Keywords
household food waste, food waste, energy intake, seasonal variation, family size, household income, dietary intake, food supply and demand, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Adult, Animal Feed, Energy Intake, Child, Family Characteristics, Food, Food Analysis, United Kingdom, Humans, Income, Seasons, Waste Products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review