Cited by 298Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactWaste Management and Recycling

Food and drink waste from households in the UK

Quested, T. E., Parry, A. D., Easteal, S., Swannell, R.·2011·Nutrition Bulletin

Abstract

Summary Reducing the amount of food and drink that is wasted is a key element in developing a sustainable food system. In the UK, the largest contribution to food waste is from homes: 8.3 million tonnes per year, costing consumers £12 billion and contributing 3% of UK greenhouse gas emissions. This paper describes recent insights gained from research by the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) and others into the types of food wasted, why it is wasted and what can be done to minimise it. The research methods used – which have parallels with dietary research – are described and findings of interest to the field of nutrition are highlighted, including the impact of waste on intake (e.g. 0.8 portions of fruit and vegetables are wasted per person per day). The activities undertaken by WRAP and its partners to minimise household food waste are described: consumer engagement and working with retailers and food manufacturers to help consumers to buy the right amount, keep what they buy at its best and use what they buy. Between 2006–2007 and 2009, the amount of household food waste reduced, this is discussed in light of the work of WRAP and its partners, and other influences such as food prices. Areas for future research and engagement to further reduce the quantity and impact of food waste are outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2011.01924.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Waste composition analyses do not generate information about the causes of food loss and waste.

    “Waste composition analyses have limitations on information about specific waste quantities by food category and do not include alternative disposal routes of households, such as a separate bio-waste collection, home composting, or the use as pet food [103], but above all, there is no generation of information about the causes of the FLW.”
  • Waste composition analyses have limitations on information about specific waste quantities by food category and do not include alternative disposal routes of households, such as separate bio-waste collection, home composting, or use as pet food.

    “Waste composition analyses have limitations on information about specific waste quantities by food category and do not include alternative disposal routes of households, such as a separate bio-waste collection, home composting, or the use as pet food [103], but above all, there is no generation of information about the causes of the FLW.”
  • The food and drink wasted in UK homes that could have been eaten has a retail value of approximately £12 billion.

    “Quested et al. (2011) suggest that the food and drink wasted in UK homes that could have been eaten has a retail value of approximately £12 billion.”
  • Self-report methods such as surveys and diaries can be unreliable and tend to underestimate food waste generation.

    “research shows that such observational methods can be unreliable and tend to underestimate food waste generation (17–19).”

    From Valuing the multiple impacts of household food waste (2019) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quested, T. E., Parry, A. D., Easteal, S., & Swannell, R.
Affiliations
Wrap (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Quested, T. E.
Venue
Nutrition Bulletin
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-08
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
460-467
ISSN
  • 1467-3010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-9827
OpenAlex
W2105631206
Cited by
297
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nutrition Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
household food waste, food waste reduction, sustainable food systems, greenhouse gas emissions, fruit and vegetable waste, customer engagement, food prices, dietary intake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review